调解是解决与使用生殖技术的合同管制有关的争端的一种方式

IF 0.7
O. Bilanov, T. Kharchenko, Halyna V. Lavryk, Viktoriіa Prokopenko
{"title":"调解是解决与使用生殖技术的合同管制有关的争端的一种方式","authors":"O. Bilanov, T. Kharchenko, Halyna V. Lavryk, Viktoriіa Prokopenko","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4177.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dispute resolution approach, which transfers a conflict to the jurisdictional authorities for examination, is losing its relevance nowadays. The study presents the analysis of the practice related to the resolution of conflicts arising in the field of application of reproductive technologies through mediation. The authors have analyzed statistical data, judicial practice, surveys on the use of reproductive technologies. The advantages of resorting to mediation in the field of reproductive technologies are speed, lower cost, lack of formalism, simpler procedure for resolving this type of conflicts, application at the discretion of the participants, guarantee of full confidentiality, objectivity of conflict resolution with the participation of a neutral third party, taking into account the best interests of the child. The mediation agreement is also an independent segment of civil law and cannot be identified with a settlement agreement, but only be the basis for its adoption already in court proceedings. In conclusion, comparing the disadvantages and advantages of the use of mediation in the field of reproductive technologies, it can be stated that the latter significantly prevail.","PeriodicalId":40854,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Politicas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mediation as a way to resolve disputes related to the contractual regulation of the use of reproductive technologies\",\"authors\":\"O. Bilanov, T. Kharchenko, Halyna V. Lavryk, Viktoriіa Prokopenko\",\"doi\":\"10.46398/cuestpol.4177.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dispute resolution approach, which transfers a conflict to the jurisdictional authorities for examination, is losing its relevance nowadays. The study presents the analysis of the practice related to the resolution of conflicts arising in the field of application of reproductive technologies through mediation. The authors have analyzed statistical data, judicial practice, surveys on the use of reproductive technologies. The advantages of resorting to mediation in the field of reproductive technologies are speed, lower cost, lack of formalism, simpler procedure for resolving this type of conflicts, application at the discretion of the participants, guarantee of full confidentiality, objectivity of conflict resolution with the participation of a neutral third party, taking into account the best interests of the child. The mediation agreement is also an independent segment of civil law and cannot be identified with a settlement agreement, but only be the basis for its adoption already in court proceedings. In conclusion, comparing the disadvantages and advantages of the use of mediation in the field of reproductive technologies, it can be stated that the latter significantly prevail.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuestiones Politicas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuestiones Politicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Politicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将冲突移交司法机关审查的争端解决办法,如今正失去其适切性。本研究分析了通过调解解决生殖技术应用领域中产生的冲突的做法。作者对生殖技术使用的统计数据、司法实践、调查进行了分析。在生殖技术领域诉诸调解的优点是速度快、费用低、没有形式主义、解决这类冲突的程序简单、由参与人自行决定适用、保证充分保密、在中立第三方的参与下客观地解决冲突,并考虑到儿童的最大利益。调解协议也是民法的一个独立部分,不能与和解协议等同,而只能作为已在法庭程序中采用和解协议的基础。总之,比较在生殖技术领域使用调解的缺点和优点,可以说后者明显占上风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mediation as a way to resolve disputes related to the contractual regulation of the use of reproductive technologies
The dispute resolution approach, which transfers a conflict to the jurisdictional authorities for examination, is losing its relevance nowadays. The study presents the analysis of the practice related to the resolution of conflicts arising in the field of application of reproductive technologies through mediation. The authors have analyzed statistical data, judicial practice, surveys on the use of reproductive technologies. The advantages of resorting to mediation in the field of reproductive technologies are speed, lower cost, lack of formalism, simpler procedure for resolving this type of conflicts, application at the discretion of the participants, guarantee of full confidentiality, objectivity of conflict resolution with the participation of a neutral third party, taking into account the best interests of the child. The mediation agreement is also an independent segment of civil law and cannot be identified with a settlement agreement, but only be the basis for its adoption already in court proceedings. In conclusion, comparing the disadvantages and advantages of the use of mediation in the field of reproductive technologies, it can be stated that the latter significantly prevail.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuestiones Politicas
Cuestiones Politicas POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
42.90%
发文量
154
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信