晚期人文主义与革命口才:詹姆斯·洛弗尔及其1771年波士顿大屠杀演说

IF 0.1 4区历史学 Q3 HISTORY

NEW ENGLAND QUARTERLY-A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF NEW ENGLAND LIFE AND LETTERS Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1162/tneq_a_00914

S. McManus

{"title":"晚期人文主义与革命口才:詹姆斯·洛弗尔及其1771年波士顿大屠杀演说","authors":"S. McManus","doi":"10.1162/tneq_a_00914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reconstructs the context of the first Boston Massacre Oration delivered by James Lovell. It argues that Lovell's rhetorical education and oratorical practice were primarily an offshoot of a classicizing renaissance tradition transmitted by the colonial colleges that faded, blurred and was repurposed in the eighteenth century.","PeriodicalId":44619,"journal":{"name":"NEW ENGLAND QUARTERLY-A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF NEW ENGLAND LIFE AND LETTERS","volume":"94 1","pages":"497-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late-Humanism and Revolutionary Eloquence: James Lovell and His 1771 Boston Massacre Oration\",\"authors\":\"S. McManus\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/tneq_a_00914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article reconstructs the context of the first Boston Massacre Oration delivered by James Lovell. It argues that Lovell's rhetorical education and oratorical practice were primarily an offshoot of a classicizing renaissance tradition transmitted by the colonial colleges that faded, blurred and was repurposed in the eighteenth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ENGLAND QUARTERLY-A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF NEW ENGLAND LIFE AND LETTERS\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"497-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ENGLAND QUARTERLY-A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF NEW ENGLAND LIFE AND LETTERS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/tneq_a_00914\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ENGLAND QUARTERLY-A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF NEW ENGLAND LIFE AND LETTERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/tneq_a_00914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文重构了詹姆斯·洛弗尔第一次发表波士顿大屠杀演说的语境。它认为，洛弗尔的修辞教育和演讲实践主要是殖民学院传播的古典文艺复兴传统的一个分支，这种传统在18世纪逐渐消失、模糊并被重新利用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Late-Humanism and Revolutionary Eloquence: James Lovell and His 1771 Boston Massacre Oration

Abstract This article reconstructs the context of the first Boston Massacre Oration delivered by James Lovell. It argues that Lovell's rhetorical education and oratorical practice were primarily an offshoot of a classicizing renaissance tradition transmitted by the colonial colleges that faded, blurred and was repurposed in the eighteenth century.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

NEW ENGLAND QUARTERLY-A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF NEW ENGLAND LIFE AND LETTERS Multiple-

自引率

50.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Contributions cover a range of time periods, from before European colonization to the present, and any subject germane to New England’s history—for example, the region’s diverse literary and cultural heritage, its political philosophies, race relations, labor struggles, religious contro- versies, and the organization of family life. The journal also treats the migration of New England ideas, people, and institutions to other parts of the United States and the world. In addition to major essays, features include memoranda and edited documents, reconsiderations of traditional texts and interpretations, essay reviews, and book reviews.