多词脸：福奇作为一个修辞精明的科学家公民

IF 0.3 4区哲学 0 LITERATURE

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-07-14 DOI:10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0239

L. Ceccarelli

{"title":"多词脸：福奇作为一个修辞精明的科学家公民","authors":"L. Ceccarelli","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Anthony Fauci, an infectious disease expert in the White House’s coronavirus task force, is challenged to offer responsible public communication of science despite working under a habitual liar who has no tolerance for criticism or dissent. Fauci manages this rhetorical exigence by using strategic ambiguity, the topos of the honest broker, dissociation, and a narrative that constrains executive decision making.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Polysemic Facepalm: Fauci as Rhetorically Savvy Scientist Citizen\",\"authors\":\"L. Ceccarelli\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Anthony Fauci, an infectious disease expert in the White House’s coronavirus task force, is challenged to offer responsible public communication of science despite working under a habitual liar who has no tolerance for criticism or dissent. Fauci manages this rhetorical exigence by using strategic ambiguity, the topos of the honest broker, dissociation, and a narrative that constrains executive decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0239\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要：白宫冠状病毒特别工作组的传染病专家安东尼·福奇（Anthony Fauci）面临着提供负责任的科学公共传播的挑战，尽管他在一个习惯性的骗子手下工作，这个骗子对批评或异议毫不容忍。福奇通过使用战略模糊性、诚实经纪人的拓扑、分离和限制高管决策的叙事来处理这种修辞上的紧迫性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Polysemic Facepalm: Fauci as Rhetorically Savvy Scientist Citizen

abstract:Anthony Fauci, an infectious disease expert in the White House’s coronavirus task force, is challenged to offer responsible public communication of science despite working under a habitual liar who has no tolerance for criticism or dissent. Fauci manages this rhetorical exigence by using strategic ambiguity, the topos of the honest broker, dissociation, and a narrative that constrains executive decision making.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy and Rhetoric is dedicated to publication of high-quality articles involving the relationship between philosophy and rhetoric. It has a longstanding commitment to interdisciplinary scholarship and welcomes all theoretical and methodological perspectives that advance the journal"s mission. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation, philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric with a strong philosophical emphasis, and philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric of other areas of human culture and thought, political theory and law.