笛子效应与反笛子效应:足球锦标赛与体育渎职对高校的影响

IF 1.8 3区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Journal of Sports Economics Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1177/15270025231174618

Abigail Cormier, Austin F. Eggers, Peter A. Groothuis, K. Rotthoff

{"title":"笛子效应与反笛子效应:足球锦标赛与体育渎职对高校的影响","authors":"Abigail Cormier, Austin F. Eggers, Peter A. Groothuis, K. Rotthoff","doi":"10.1177/15270025231174618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Athletics can impact the entire university, and there is evidence that administrators’ peer rankings are influenced by athletics as well. We analyze both the positive effect of winning championships and the negative effects of football bowl bans and vacated games. We find that championship effects are positive: increasing peer rankings, alumni giving, and student academic quality. Surprisingly, peer rankings increase the year of the football bowl ban but decrease the year after the ban. Additionally, there is evidence that bowl bans increase a school's acceptance rate and decrease academic quality at the sanctioned university, whereas vacated games lower alumni giving.","PeriodicalId":51522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Economics","volume":"24 1","pages":"903 - 931"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Flutie and Anti-Flutie Effect: The Impact of Football Championships and Athletic Malfeasance on the University\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Cormier, Austin F. Eggers, Peter A. Groothuis, K. Rotthoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15270025231174618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Athletics can impact the entire university, and there is evidence that administrators’ peer rankings are influenced by athletics as well. We analyze both the positive effect of winning championships and the negative effects of football bowl bans and vacated games. We find that championship effects are positive: increasing peer rankings, alumni giving, and student academic quality. Surprisingly, peer rankings increase the year of the football bowl ban but decrease the year after the ban. Additionally, there is evidence that bowl bans increase a school's acceptance rate and decrease academic quality at the sanctioned university, whereas vacated games lower alumni giving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Economics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"903 - 931\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025231174618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025231174618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

体育运动可以影响整个大学，有证据表明，管理人员的同行排名也受到体育运动的影响。我们分析了赢得冠军的积极影响和足球碗禁令和空缺比赛的负面影响。我们发现冠军效应是积极的:提高同行排名、校友捐赠和学生学术质量。令人惊讶的是，同行排名在足球碗禁令的年份上升，但在禁令的第二年下降。此外，有证据表明，碗禁令提高了学校的录取率，降低了受制裁大学的学术质量，而空出的比赛则降低了校友的捐赠。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Flutie and Anti-Flutie Effect: The Impact of Football Championships and Athletic Malfeasance on the University

Athletics can impact the entire university, and there is evidence that administrators’ peer rankings are influenced by athletics as well. We analyze both the positive effect of winning championships and the negative effects of football bowl bans and vacated games. We find that championship effects are positive: increasing peer rankings, alumni giving, and student academic quality. Surprisingly, peer rankings increase the year of the football bowl ban but decrease the year after the ban. Additionally, there is evidence that bowl bans increase a school's acceptance rate and decrease academic quality at the sanctioned university, whereas vacated games lower alumni giving.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Sports Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

17.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Sports Economics publishes scholarly research in the field of sports economics. The aim of the journal is to further research in the area of sports economics by bringing together theoretical and empirical research in a single intellectual venue. Relevant topics include: labor market research; labor-management relations; collective bargaining; wage determination; local public finance; and other fields related to the economics of sports. Published quarterly, the Journal of Sports Economics is unique in that it is the only journal devoted specifically to this rapidly growing field.