欧洲以外的民粹主义激进派

IF 1.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Lisa Zanotti
{"title":"欧洲以外的民粹主义激进派","authors":"Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Lisa Zanotti","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22136.rov","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Although the populist radical right (PRR) has become a global phenomenon, research about it focuses much more on\n Europe than on other regions. To counter this imbalance, this special issue provides comparative evidence on the discourse\n elaborated by the PRR on six non-European countries: Australia, Brazil, Chile, India, Turkey, and the United States. As we will\n show, non-European PRR forces articulate authoritarian, nativist, and populist ideas in different ways than their European\n brethren and they employ specific ideological elements (e.g., neoliberalism and religion) to advance discourses that resonate with\n the social grievances that are preponderant in the context wherein they operate. This reveals that part of the success of the PRR\n is related to its discursive flexibility and capacity to adapt itself with the aim of constructing frames that connect with the\n anxieties experimented by segments of the voting public across different national and regional settings.","PeriodicalId":51676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Politics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The populist radical right beyond Europe\",\"authors\":\"Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Lisa Zanotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jlp.22136.rov\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Although the populist radical right (PRR) has become a global phenomenon, research about it focuses much more on\\n Europe than on other regions. To counter this imbalance, this special issue provides comparative evidence on the discourse\\n elaborated by the PRR on six non-European countries: Australia, Brazil, Chile, India, Turkey, and the United States. As we will\\n show, non-European PRR forces articulate authoritarian, nativist, and populist ideas in different ways than their European\\n brethren and they employ specific ideological elements (e.g., neoliberalism and religion) to advance discourses that resonate with\\n the social grievances that are preponderant in the context wherein they operate. This reveals that part of the success of the PRR\\n is related to its discursive flexibility and capacity to adapt itself with the aim of constructing frames that connect with the\\n anxieties experimented by segments of the voting public across different national and regional settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22136.rov\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22136.rov","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然民粹主义极右翼(PRR)已经成为一种全球现象,但有关它的研究更多地集中在欧洲,而不是其他地区。为了消除这种不平衡,本期特刊提供了PRR对六个非欧洲国家(澳大利亚、巴西、智利、印度、土耳其和美国)阐述的论述的比较证据。正如我们将展示的那样,非欧洲PRR力量以不同于欧洲兄弟的方式表达威权主义、本土主义和民粹主义思想,他们采用特定的意识形态元素(例如,新自由主义和宗教)来推进与社会不满共鸣的话语,这些不满在他们运作的背景下占主导地位。这表明,PRR的部分成功与其话语的灵活性和适应能力有关,其目的是构建框架,将不同国家和地区背景下的投票公众部分所经历的焦虑联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The populist radical right beyond Europe
Although the populist radical right (PRR) has become a global phenomenon, research about it focuses much more on Europe than on other regions. To counter this imbalance, this special issue provides comparative evidence on the discourse elaborated by the PRR on six non-European countries: Australia, Brazil, Chile, India, Turkey, and the United States. As we will show, non-European PRR forces articulate authoritarian, nativist, and populist ideas in different ways than their European brethren and they employ specific ideological elements (e.g., neoliberalism and religion) to advance discourses that resonate with the social grievances that are preponderant in the context wherein they operate. This reveals that part of the success of the PRR is related to its discursive flexibility and capacity to adapt itself with the aim of constructing frames that connect with the anxieties experimented by segments of the voting public across different national and regional settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信