反击:针对企业欺凌目标的新法律补救措施

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
Lisa Chamberlain
{"title":"反击:针对企业欺凌目标的新法律补救措施","authors":"Lisa Chamberlain","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2022.2044377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 9 February 2021, the Western Cape High Court delivered an important victory for all human rights defenders (HRDs) working to challenge corporate and state power in South Africa. The case involves the consolidation of three separate claims of alleged defamation brought by Australian-based mining company Mineral Commodities Limited (MRC) and its affiliates (referred to collectively in this case note as ‘the mining company’), against six HRDs (referred to collectively here as ‘the activists’) who have been critical of two of the company’s controversial operations. These mining operations are in Xolobeni in the Eastern Cape and near Lutzville on the West Coast respectively. The case is a critically important development in the field of human rights and social justice as it has recognised these defamation claims as an attempt by the mining company to silence criticism of its operations and hence as the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) suit (discussed further below). The judgment, authored by Goliath DJP, will be referred to in this case note as ‘the Goliath judgment’. To fully appreciate the significance of the Goliath judgment, it is necessary to understand the broader context in which it is located. It is widely acknowledged that HRDs play a seminal role in furthering the realisation of human rights, and thereby in pro-","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"410 - 422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SLAPPing back: A new legal remedy for targets of corporate bullying\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Chamberlain\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02587203.2022.2044377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 9 February 2021, the Western Cape High Court delivered an important victory for all human rights defenders (HRDs) working to challenge corporate and state power in South Africa. The case involves the consolidation of three separate claims of alleged defamation brought by Australian-based mining company Mineral Commodities Limited (MRC) and its affiliates (referred to collectively in this case note as ‘the mining company’), against six HRDs (referred to collectively here as ‘the activists’) who have been critical of two of the company’s controversial operations. These mining operations are in Xolobeni in the Eastern Cape and near Lutzville on the West Coast respectively. The case is a critically important development in the field of human rights and social justice as it has recognised these defamation claims as an attempt by the mining company to silence criticism of its operations and hence as the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) suit (discussed further below). The judgment, authored by Goliath DJP, will be referred to in this case note as ‘the Goliath judgment’. To fully appreciate the significance of the Goliath judgment, it is necessary to understand the broader context in which it is located. It is widely acknowledged that HRDs play a seminal role in furthering the realisation of human rights, and thereby in pro-\",\"PeriodicalId\":44989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"410 - 422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2044377\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2044377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年2月9日,西开普省高等法院为所有致力于挑战南非企业和国家权力的人权维护者(HRDs)取得了一项重要胜利。该案件涉及澳大利亚矿业公司Mineral Commodities Limited (MRC)及其附属公司(在本案件注释中统称为“矿业公司”)对六名人权捍卫者(在本案件注释中统称为“活动人士”)提出的三起独立的诽谤指控的合并,这些人权捍卫者批评了该公司两项有争议的业务。这些采矿作业分别在东开普省的索罗贝尼和西海岸的卢茨维尔附近进行。该案件是人权和社会正义领域的一个至关重要的发展,因为它承认这些诽谤指控是矿业公司试图压制对其业务的批评,因此作为反对公众参与的战略诉讼(SLAPP)诉讼(下文将进一步讨论)。由Goliath DJP撰写的判决书将在本案例注释中称为“Goliath判决书”。为了充分理解歌利亚审判的重要性,有必要了解它所处的更广泛的背景。人们普遍认为,人权捍卫者在促进人权的实现方面发挥着开创性的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SLAPPing back: A new legal remedy for targets of corporate bullying
On 9 February 2021, the Western Cape High Court delivered an important victory for all human rights defenders (HRDs) working to challenge corporate and state power in South Africa. The case involves the consolidation of three separate claims of alleged defamation brought by Australian-based mining company Mineral Commodities Limited (MRC) and its affiliates (referred to collectively in this case note as ‘the mining company’), against six HRDs (referred to collectively here as ‘the activists’) who have been critical of two of the company’s controversial operations. These mining operations are in Xolobeni in the Eastern Cape and near Lutzville on the West Coast respectively. The case is a critically important development in the field of human rights and social justice as it has recognised these defamation claims as an attempt by the mining company to silence criticism of its operations and hence as the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) suit (discussed further below). The judgment, authored by Goliath DJP, will be referred to in this case note as ‘the Goliath judgment’. To fully appreciate the significance of the Goliath judgment, it is necessary to understand the broader context in which it is located. It is widely acknowledged that HRDs play a seminal role in furthering the realisation of human rights, and thereby in pro-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信