组织结构的维度研究:元分析与概念重定向

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
J. Wagner
{"title":"组织结构的维度研究:元分析与概念重定向","authors":"J. Wagner","doi":"10.1017/jmo.2021.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A previous meta-analysis of dimensional structure research published during the latter half of the 20th century revealed significant intercorrelation among structural dimensions inspired by Max Weber's bureaucratic ideal type, providing support for continued research on dimensional structures and for the bureaucratic structural model that served as its theoretical foundation. A new meta-analysis reported in this article, motivated by questions regarding the continued applicability of bureaucratic dimensional models in the later era of new organization forms, indicates that many of the interrelationships among five structural dimensions (formalization, standardization, specialization, vertical differentiation, and decentralization) have weakened since the time of the earlier meta-analysis. The results of this study, conducted using a sample of 346 correlations from a collection of 155 published articles, are interpreted as failing to provide consistent evidence supporting a central tenet of the bureaucratic structural model, therefore, as indicating that dimensional structural research now lacks a viable theoretical foundation.","PeriodicalId":47612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Organization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensional research on organization structure: meta-analysis and conceptual redirection\",\"authors\":\"J. Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jmo.2021.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A previous meta-analysis of dimensional structure research published during the latter half of the 20th century revealed significant intercorrelation among structural dimensions inspired by Max Weber's bureaucratic ideal type, providing support for continued research on dimensional structures and for the bureaucratic structural model that served as its theoretical foundation. A new meta-analysis reported in this article, motivated by questions regarding the continued applicability of bureaucratic dimensional models in the later era of new organization forms, indicates that many of the interrelationships among five structural dimensions (formalization, standardization, specialization, vertical differentiation, and decentralization) have weakened since the time of the earlier meta-analysis. The results of this study, conducted using a sample of 346 correlations from a collection of 155 published articles, are interpreted as failing to provide consistent evidence supporting a central tenet of the bureaucratic structural model, therefore, as indicating that dimensional structural research now lacks a viable theoretical foundation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management & Organization\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.63\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.63","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

20世纪下半叶发表的一项对维度结构研究的元分析显示,受马克斯·韦伯的官僚主义理想类型启发,结构维度之间存在显著的相互关联,为维度结构的持续研究和作为其理论基础的官僚结构模型提供了支持。本文中报道的一项新的荟萃分析表明,自早期的荟萃分析以来,五个结构维度(形式化、标准化、专业化、垂直差异化和去中心化)之间的许多相互关系已经减弱。该分析的动机是关于官僚维度模型在新组织形式后期的持续适用性问题。本研究从155篇已发表的文章中选取了346个相关性样本,其结果被解释为未能提供一致的证据来支持官僚结构模型的核心原则,因此,表明维度结构研究目前缺乏可行的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dimensional research on organization structure: meta-analysis and conceptual redirection
A previous meta-analysis of dimensional structure research published during the latter half of the 20th century revealed significant intercorrelation among structural dimensions inspired by Max Weber's bureaucratic ideal type, providing support for continued research on dimensional structures and for the bureaucratic structural model that served as its theoretical foundation. A new meta-analysis reported in this article, motivated by questions regarding the continued applicability of bureaucratic dimensional models in the later era of new organization forms, indicates that many of the interrelationships among five structural dimensions (formalization, standardization, specialization, vertical differentiation, and decentralization) have weakened since the time of the earlier meta-analysis. The results of this study, conducted using a sample of 346 correlations from a collection of 155 published articles, are interpreted as failing to provide consistent evidence supporting a central tenet of the bureaucratic structural model, therefore, as indicating that dimensional structural research now lacks a viable theoretical foundation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management & Organization is an international peer-reviewed journal from eContent, in association with ANZAM. It provides global perspectives on management and organization of benefit to scholars, educators, students, practitioners, policy-makers and consultants worldwide. In one forum, Journal of Management & Organization covers: •Qualitative and quantitative empirical research articles •Theoretical and conceptual articles •Literature reviews - including those from theses •Articles on management education and learning •Practitioner perspectives and case studies •Methodological advances - including those from theses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信