高山沼泽山雀(Poecile palustris palustris)除了翅膀长度外,没有明显的性别二态性

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Manuel Polo Aparisi, E. Schöll, S. Hille
{"title":"高山沼泽山雀(Poecile palustris palustris)除了翅膀长度外,没有明显的性别二态性","authors":"Manuel Polo Aparisi, E. Schöll, S. Hille","doi":"10.1080/03078698.2018.1528715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sexing Marsh Tits Poecile palustris by wing length has long been general practice in Europe but has recently been under discussion again in Great Britain. Although this debate has concentrated on British populations of the subspecies P.p. dresseri, we contribute in two ways – first by studying a population of the nominate form P.p. palustris in eastern Austria and second by applying a multivariate approach to a series of biometric variables alongside wing length. We measured 13 further biometric parameters that are known to differ between sexes and calculated conditional inference trees to identify the best sex-differentiating variable. With no misclassifications detected, we proved wing length to be the most reliable variable to identify sexes throughout age classes, with males exhibiting wings longer than 64 mm. Lengths of sixth, seventh and eighth primaries and of tail feathers could also be used, but sex was identified less accurately (with 4.8–6.7% misclassifications). Other biometric measurements, like body mass and the lengths of tarsometatarsus, bill and remaining primary feathers, were not suitable for sex differentiation.","PeriodicalId":35936,"journal":{"name":"Ringing and Migration","volume":"33 1","pages":"36 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03078698.2018.1528715","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alpine Marsh Tits Poecile palustris palustris exhibit no clear sexual dimorphism other than in wing length\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Polo Aparisi, E. Schöll, S. Hille\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03078698.2018.1528715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Sexing Marsh Tits Poecile palustris by wing length has long been general practice in Europe but has recently been under discussion again in Great Britain. Although this debate has concentrated on British populations of the subspecies P.p. dresseri, we contribute in two ways – first by studying a population of the nominate form P.p. palustris in eastern Austria and second by applying a multivariate approach to a series of biometric variables alongside wing length. We measured 13 further biometric parameters that are known to differ between sexes and calculated conditional inference trees to identify the best sex-differentiating variable. With no misclassifications detected, we proved wing length to be the most reliable variable to identify sexes throughout age classes, with males exhibiting wings longer than 64 mm. Lengths of sixth, seventh and eighth primaries and of tail feathers could also be used, but sex was identified less accurately (with 4.8–6.7% misclassifications). Other biometric measurements, like body mass and the lengths of tarsometatarsus, bill and remaining primary feathers, were not suitable for sex differentiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ringing and Migration\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"36 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03078698.2018.1528715\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ringing and Migration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2018.1528715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ringing and Migration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2018.1528715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:对沼泽山雀翅膀长度进行性别划分在欧洲早已是一种普遍做法,但最近在英国又进行了讨论。尽管这场争论主要集中在德塞里P.P.亚种的英国种群上,但我们有两个方面的贡献——第一,研究奥地利东部的一个提名形式的P.P.palustris种群,第二,将多元方法应用于一系列与翅膀长度相关的生物特征变量。我们进一步测量了13个已知性别不同的生物特征参数,并计算了条件推理树,以确定最佳的性别区分变量。在没有检测到错误分类的情况下,我们证明翅膀长度是识别各个年龄段性别的最可靠变量,雄性翅膀的长度超过64 毫米。也可以使用第六、第七和第八原色的长度以及尾羽的长度,但性别的识别不太准确(错误分类率为4.8-6.7%)。其他生物特征测量,如体重和跗骨、喙和剩余初级羽毛的长度,不适合性别区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alpine Marsh Tits Poecile palustris palustris exhibit no clear sexual dimorphism other than in wing length
ABSTRACT Sexing Marsh Tits Poecile palustris by wing length has long been general practice in Europe but has recently been under discussion again in Great Britain. Although this debate has concentrated on British populations of the subspecies P.p. dresseri, we contribute in two ways – first by studying a population of the nominate form P.p. palustris in eastern Austria and second by applying a multivariate approach to a series of biometric variables alongside wing length. We measured 13 further biometric parameters that are known to differ between sexes and calculated conditional inference trees to identify the best sex-differentiating variable. With no misclassifications detected, we proved wing length to be the most reliable variable to identify sexes throughout age classes, with males exhibiting wings longer than 64 mm. Lengths of sixth, seventh and eighth primaries and of tail feathers could also be used, but sex was identified less accurately (with 4.8–6.7% misclassifications). Other biometric measurements, like body mass and the lengths of tarsometatarsus, bill and remaining primary feathers, were not suitable for sex differentiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ringing and Migration
Ringing and Migration Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信