Leandro Vinhas de Paula, Flávia E. Costa, R. Ferreira, R. Menezes, F. Z. Werneck, E. F. Coelho, P. Greco
{"title":"2007 - 2017年女子手球世锦赛胜负差异性比赛变量分析","authors":"Leandro Vinhas de Paula, Flávia E. Costa, R. Ferreira, R. Menezes, F. Z. Werneck, E. F. Coelho, P. Greco","doi":"10.26582/k.52.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to identify game variables that discriminate winning from losing teams and to understand how these variables contribute to victory by observing differences of goals in matches of women's handball world championships. The sample comprised 471 games between 2007 to 2017. The games were grouped into three clusters (balanced games - difference of 1 to 8 goals; unbalanced games - difference of 9 to 20 goals; very unbalanced games - difference of > 20 goals). In comparisons of means, the performance of winning teams is significantly higher (most variables), or lower in the case of number of technical fouls (p < .05). In balanced games, there is a greater contribuition of defensive variables (stollen balls, blocked throws and goalkeeper efficiency) in relation to attack variables (attack efficiency and throw efficiency). For victory, the number of technical fouls reduces to a lesser extent the chances of winning. Games with unbalanced and very unbalanced scores seem to follow a same tendency. We conclude that the decisive variables for victory showed a greater weight with a special emphasis on stolen balls followed by offensive variables (throw efficiency, attack efficiency and technical fouls) in balanced games.","PeriodicalId":49943,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiology","volume":"52 1","pages":"54-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.26582/k.52.1.6","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of discriminatory game variables between winners and losers in women’s handball world championships from 2007 to 2017\",\"authors\":\"Leandro Vinhas de Paula, Flávia E. Costa, R. Ferreira, R. Menezes, F. Z. Werneck, E. F. Coelho, P. Greco\",\"doi\":\"10.26582/k.52.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to identify game variables that discriminate winning from losing teams and to understand how these variables contribute to victory by observing differences of goals in matches of women's handball world championships. The sample comprised 471 games between 2007 to 2017. The games were grouped into three clusters (balanced games - difference of 1 to 8 goals; unbalanced games - difference of 9 to 20 goals; very unbalanced games - difference of > 20 goals). In comparisons of means, the performance of winning teams is significantly higher (most variables), or lower in the case of number of technical fouls (p < .05). In balanced games, there is a greater contribuition of defensive variables (stollen balls, blocked throws and goalkeeper efficiency) in relation to attack variables (attack efficiency and throw efficiency). For victory, the number of technical fouls reduces to a lesser extent the chances of winning. Games with unbalanced and very unbalanced scores seem to follow a same tendency. We conclude that the decisive variables for victory showed a greater weight with a special emphasis on stolen balls followed by offensive variables (throw efficiency, attack efficiency and technical fouls) in balanced games.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"54-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.26582/k.52.1.6\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26582/k.52.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26582/k.52.1.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of discriminatory game variables between winners and losers in women’s handball world championships from 2007 to 2017
The aim of this study was to identify game variables that discriminate winning from losing teams and to understand how these variables contribute to victory by observing differences of goals in matches of women's handball world championships. The sample comprised 471 games between 2007 to 2017. The games were grouped into three clusters (balanced games - difference of 1 to 8 goals; unbalanced games - difference of 9 to 20 goals; very unbalanced games - difference of > 20 goals). In comparisons of means, the performance of winning teams is significantly higher (most variables), or lower in the case of number of technical fouls (p < .05). In balanced games, there is a greater contribuition of defensive variables (stollen balls, blocked throws and goalkeeper efficiency) in relation to attack variables (attack efficiency and throw efficiency). For victory, the number of technical fouls reduces to a lesser extent the chances of winning. Games with unbalanced and very unbalanced scores seem to follow a same tendency. We conclude that the decisive variables for victory showed a greater weight with a special emphasis on stolen balls followed by offensive variables (throw efficiency, attack efficiency and technical fouls) in balanced games.
期刊介绍:
Kinesiology – International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology (print ISSN 1331- 1441, online ISSN 1848-638X) publishes twice a year scientific papers and other written material from kinesiology (a scientific discipline which investigates art and science of human movement; in the meaning and scope close to the idiom “sport sciences”) and other adjacent human sciences focused on sport and exercise, primarily from anthropology (biological and cultural alike), medicine, sociology, psychology, natural sciences and mathematics applied to sport in its broadest sense, history, and others. Contributions of high scientific interest, including also results of theoretical analyses and their practical application in physical education, sport, physical recreation and kinesitherapy, are accepted for publication. The following sections define the scope of the journal: Sport and sports activities, Physical education, Recreation/leisure, Kinesiological anthropology, Training methods, Biology of sport and exercise, Sports medicine and physiology of sport, Biomechanics, History of sport and Book reviews with news.