一种符合人体工程学的气门扳手的设计与评价

Saif K. Al-Qaisi, F. Aghazadeh
{"title":"一种符合人体工程学的气门扳手的设计与评价","authors":"Saif K. Al-Qaisi, F. Aghazadeh","doi":"10.3233/OER-170253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The torque required to manually turn a handwheel-valve typically exceeds operators’ capabilities, requiring them to use a valve-wrench. Although valve-wrenches are commonly used, an ergonomic wrench has not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE: To introduce an ergonomically designed valve-wrench and evaluate it with respect to conventional valve opening methods. METHODS: Four methods were compared including: bare hands, restricted conventional wrench (assumes presence of obstructions), unrestricted conventional wrench, and ergonomically-modified wrench. Each method was performed at two torque settings, 15 Nm and 30 Nm. Electromyography activities were measured from eight trunk and shoulder muscles. The time to fully open the valve and Borg-ratings were recorded for each method. RESULTS: The modified wrench resulted in the lowest average time and Borg-rating; however, these averages were not significantly different from the averages of the unrestricted conventional wrench. The method that was associated with the lowest overall electromyography activities was restricted conventional wrench, followed subsequently by bare hands, modified wrench, and unrestricted conventional wrench. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ergonomically-modified wrench was associated with relatively high electromyography activities, it was the most time-efficient method, allowing the muscles to sustain physical loads for shorter periods of time. Overall, participants rated this method as the least physically demanding.","PeriodicalId":91780,"journal":{"name":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","volume":"13 1","pages":"47-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170253","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The design and evaluation of an ergonomic valve-wrench\",\"authors\":\"Saif K. Al-Qaisi, F. Aghazadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/OER-170253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The torque required to manually turn a handwheel-valve typically exceeds operators’ capabilities, requiring them to use a valve-wrench. Although valve-wrenches are commonly used, an ergonomic wrench has not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE: To introduce an ergonomically designed valve-wrench and evaluate it with respect to conventional valve opening methods. METHODS: Four methods were compared including: bare hands, restricted conventional wrench (assumes presence of obstructions), unrestricted conventional wrench, and ergonomically-modified wrench. Each method was performed at two torque settings, 15 Nm and 30 Nm. Electromyography activities were measured from eight trunk and shoulder muscles. The time to fully open the valve and Borg-ratings were recorded for each method. RESULTS: The modified wrench resulted in the lowest average time and Borg-rating; however, these averages were not significantly different from the averages of the unrestricted conventional wrench. The method that was associated with the lowest overall electromyography activities was restricted conventional wrench, followed subsequently by bare hands, modified wrench, and unrestricted conventional wrench. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ergonomically-modified wrench was associated with relatively high electromyography activities, it was the most time-efficient method, allowing the muscles to sustain physical loads for shorter periods of time. Overall, participants rated this method as the least physically demanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"47-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170253\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手动转动手轮阀门所需的扭矩通常超过操作人员的能力,要求他们使用阀门扳手。尽管阀门扳手是常用的,但尚未开发出符合人体工程学的扳手。目的:介绍一种符合人体工程学设计的气门扳手,并与传统的气门打开方法进行比较。方法:比较四种方法,包括徒手、限制性常规扳手(假设存在障碍物)、非限制性传统扳手和符合人体工程学的改良扳手。每种方法在两种扭矩设置下进行,即15 Nm和30 Nm。测量了8块躯干和肩部肌肉的肌电图活动。记录每种方法完全打开瓣膜的时间和Borg评分。结果:改良扳手的平均时间和Borg评分最低;然而,这些平均值与不受限制的传统扳手的平均值没有显著差异。与最低的总体肌电图活动相关的方法是限制性常规扳手,随后是徒手扳手、改良扳手和非限制性传统扳手。结论:尽管经过人体工程学改造的扳手与相对较高的肌电图活动有关,但它是最省时的方法,可以使肌肉在更短的时间内承受物理负荷。总体而言,参与者认为这种方法对体力的要求最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The design and evaluation of an ergonomic valve-wrench
BACKGROUND: The torque required to manually turn a handwheel-valve typically exceeds operators’ capabilities, requiring them to use a valve-wrench. Although valve-wrenches are commonly used, an ergonomic wrench has not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE: To introduce an ergonomically designed valve-wrench and evaluate it with respect to conventional valve opening methods. METHODS: Four methods were compared including: bare hands, restricted conventional wrench (assumes presence of obstructions), unrestricted conventional wrench, and ergonomically-modified wrench. Each method was performed at two torque settings, 15 Nm and 30 Nm. Electromyography activities were measured from eight trunk and shoulder muscles. The time to fully open the valve and Borg-ratings were recorded for each method. RESULTS: The modified wrench resulted in the lowest average time and Borg-rating; however, these averages were not significantly different from the averages of the unrestricted conventional wrench. The method that was associated with the lowest overall electromyography activities was restricted conventional wrench, followed subsequently by bare hands, modified wrench, and unrestricted conventional wrench. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ergonomically-modified wrench was associated with relatively high electromyography activities, it was the most time-efficient method, allowing the muscles to sustain physical loads for shorter periods of time. Overall, participants rated this method as the least physically demanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信