{"title":"阿瑟·普赖尔对同一性和差异性必然性的证明","authors":"Nils Kürbis","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2023.2237758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper draws attention to a proof of the necessity of identity given by Arthur Prior. In its simplicity it is comparable to a proof of Quine’s, popularised by Kripke, but it is slightly di ff erent. Prior’s Polish notation is transcribed into more familiar idiom. Prior’s proof is followed by a proof of the necessity of di ff erence, possibly the first such proof in the literature, which is also repeated here and transcribed. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of Prior’s views on identity and di ff erence over time.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthur Prior's Proofs of the Necessities of Identity and Difference\",\"authors\":\"Nils Kürbis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01445340.2023.2237758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper draws attention to a proof of the necessity of identity given by Arthur Prior. In its simplicity it is comparable to a proof of Quine’s, popularised by Kripke, but it is slightly di ff erent. Prior’s Polish notation is transcribed into more familiar idiom. Prior’s proof is followed by a proof of the necessity of di ff erence, possibly the first such proof in the literature, which is also repeated here and transcribed. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of Prior’s views on identity and di ff erence over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2023.2237758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2023.2237758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Arthur Prior's Proofs of the Necessities of Identity and Difference
This paper draws attention to a proof of the necessity of identity given by Arthur Prior. In its simplicity it is comparable to a proof of Quine’s, popularised by Kripke, but it is slightly di ff erent. Prior’s Polish notation is transcribed into more familiar idiom. Prior’s proof is followed by a proof of the necessity of di ff erence, possibly the first such proof in the literature, which is also repeated here and transcribed. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of Prior’s views on identity and di ff erence over time.