父权制不可避免吗:弗洛伊德神话的再思考

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
C. Siebold
{"title":"父权制不可避免吗:弗洛伊德神话的再思考","authors":"C. Siebold","doi":"10.1080/15228878.2019.1661856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Oedipal myth favored in Freud’s theorizing asserts a developmental outcome that affirms male/female difference and patriarchal authority. Despite much evidence to the contrary, these assumptions persist. This paper examines clinical, anthropological, and scientific evidence that helps us better understand gender and the triangular phase of development.","PeriodicalId":41604,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Social Work","volume":"27 1","pages":"42 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228878.2019.1661856","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Patriarchy Inevitable: Rethinking the Freudian Myth\",\"authors\":\"C. Siebold\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15228878.2019.1661856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Oedipal myth favored in Freud’s theorizing asserts a developmental outcome that affirms male/female difference and patriarchal authority. Despite much evidence to the contrary, these assumptions persist. This paper examines clinical, anthropological, and scientific evidence that helps us better understand gender and the triangular phase of development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychoanalytic Social Work\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"42 - 60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228878.2019.1661856\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychoanalytic Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228878.2019.1661856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalytic Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228878.2019.1661856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在弗洛伊德的理论中,俄狄浦斯神话主张一种肯定男女差异和父权权威的发展结果。尽管有很多相反的证据,但这些假设仍然存在。本文考察了临床、人类学和科学证据,帮助我们更好地理解性别和三角发展阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Patriarchy Inevitable: Rethinking the Freudian Myth
Abstract The Oedipal myth favored in Freud’s theorizing asserts a developmental outcome that affirms male/female difference and patriarchal authority. Despite much evidence to the contrary, these assumptions persist. This paper examines clinical, anthropological, and scientific evidence that helps us better understand gender and the triangular phase of development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Psychoanalytic Social Work provides social work clinicians and clinical educators with highly informative and stimulating articles relevant to the practice of psychoanalytic social work with the individual client. Although a variety of social work publications now exist, none focus exclusively on the important clinical themes and dilemmas that occur in a psychoanalytic social work practice. Existing clinical publications in social work have tended to dilute or diminish the significance or the scope of psychoanalytic practice in various ways. Some social work journals focus partially on clinical practice and characteristically provide an equal, if not greater, emphasis upon social welfare policy and macropractice concerns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信