微观管理问卷的构建与验证

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
M. M. Sulphey, Y. Upadhyay
{"title":"微观管理问卷的构建与验证","authors":"M. M. Sulphey, Y. Upadhyay","doi":"10.1504/IJEWE.2019.10020896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micromanagement, in ordinary parlance, is managing things closely and under strict scrutiny. The management style, which involves excessive control and close supervision, could lead to annoying situations and create an atmosphere of mistrust within the organisational settings. Micromanagers seldom give autonomy to their subordinates, dislike feedback, and get involved even in the most intricate of project details. A fair review of literature found there is no scientifically validated questionnaire to measure micromanagement. The present work is a modest effort to fill this gap in literature. By following the rules of the thumps and the stipulations provided by experts in the fields, the authors have scientifically constructed and validated a four factor, 18-item micromanagement questionnaire. Though there is further scope for refining and generalisation across cultures, the questionnaire is an effective scale for the measurement of the construct of micromanagement.","PeriodicalId":35410,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction and validation of micromanagement questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Sulphey, Y. Upadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJEWE.2019.10020896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Micromanagement, in ordinary parlance, is managing things closely and under strict scrutiny. The management style, which involves excessive control and close supervision, could lead to annoying situations and create an atmosphere of mistrust within the organisational settings. Micromanagers seldom give autonomy to their subordinates, dislike feedback, and get involved even in the most intricate of project details. A fair review of literature found there is no scientifically validated questionnaire to measure micromanagement. The present work is a modest effort to fill this gap in literature. By following the rules of the thumps and the stipulations provided by experts in the fields, the authors have scientifically constructed and validated a four factor, 18-item micromanagement questionnaire. Though there is further scope for refining and generalisation across cultures, the questionnaire is an effective scale for the measurement of the construct of micromanagement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2019.10020896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2019.10020896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

用普通的话说,微观管理就是在严格的审查下,对事物进行严密的管理。这种管理风格涉及过度控制和密切监督,可能会导致令人讨厌的情况,并在组织环境中造成不信任的气氛。微观管理者很少给予下属自主权,不喜欢反馈,甚至参与最复杂的项目细节。对文献的公平审查发现,没有经过科学验证的问卷来衡量微观管理。目前的工作是填补这一文学空白的适度努力。作者遵循重击的规律和专家的规定,科学地构建并验证了一份四因素18项微观管理问卷。尽管在不同文化之间还有进一步的提炼和推广空间,但问卷是衡量微观管理结构的有效尺度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Construction and validation of micromanagement questionnaire
Micromanagement, in ordinary parlance, is managing things closely and under strict scrutiny. The management style, which involves excessive control and close supervision, could lead to annoying situations and create an atmosphere of mistrust within the organisational settings. Micromanagers seldom give autonomy to their subordinates, dislike feedback, and get involved even in the most intricate of project details. A fair review of literature found there is no scientifically validated questionnaire to measure micromanagement. The present work is a modest effort to fill this gap in literature. By following the rules of the thumps and the stipulations provided by experts in the fields, the authors have scientifically constructed and validated a four factor, 18-item micromanagement questionnaire. Though there is further scope for refining and generalisation across cultures, the questionnaire is an effective scale for the measurement of the construct of micromanagement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment
International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment Business, Management and Accounting-Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: IJEWM is a refereed reference and authoritative source of information in the field of environmental and waste management Together with its sister publications IJEP, IJETM and IJGEnvI, it provides a comprehensive coverage of environmental issues. It covers both engineering/technical and management solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信