司法实践中的保护因素:sapro扩展版试点在攻击性事件中的附加价值

IF 2.1 3区心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Criminal Justice and Behavior Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/00938548231196572

Leen Cappon, Armin Jentsch, Saskia Roggeman, M. de Vries Robbé

{"title":"司法实践中的保护因素:sapro扩展版试点在攻击性事件中的附加价值","authors":"Leen Cappon, Armin Jentsch, Saskia Roggeman, M. de Vries Robbé","doi":"10.1177/00938548231196572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protective factors are now commonly included in comprehensive risk assessment. This study concerns an initial validation of the new SAPROF-Extended Version (SAPROF-EV) pilot, containing modifications and additions to the original SAPROF. For 139 forensic psychiatric inpatients, assessment results with the SAPROF-EV pilot and HCR-20V3 were compared with aggressive incidents. Results show good predictive validity for the SAPROF-EV pilot for all outcomes and incremental predictive validity for both the (modified) original SAPROF and the full SAPROF-EV pilot over the HCR-20V3. For the outcome aggression toward others, the additional SAPROF-EV factors provide incremental predictive validity over the (modified) original SAPROF. In addition, the user feedback from clinicians highlights experienced additional value of the new factors for treatment guidance. Based on the findings from this study, the SAPROF-EV pilot will be adjusted further into an improved and enhanced version of the SAPROF.","PeriodicalId":48287,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective Factors in Forensic Practice: The Added Value of the SAPROF-Extended Version Pilot in Relation to Aggressive Incidents\",\"authors\":\"Leen Cappon, Armin Jentsch, Saskia Roggeman, M. de Vries Robbé\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00938548231196572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protective factors are now commonly included in comprehensive risk assessment. This study concerns an initial validation of the new SAPROF-Extended Version (SAPROF-EV) pilot, containing modifications and additions to the original SAPROF. For 139 forensic psychiatric inpatients, assessment results with the SAPROF-EV pilot and HCR-20V3 were compared with aggressive incidents. Results show good predictive validity for the SAPROF-EV pilot for all outcomes and incremental predictive validity for both the (modified) original SAPROF and the full SAPROF-EV pilot over the HCR-20V3. For the outcome aggression toward others, the additional SAPROF-EV factors provide incremental predictive validity over the (modified) original SAPROF. In addition, the user feedback from clinicians highlights experienced additional value of the new factors for treatment guidance. Based on the findings from this study, the SAPROF-EV pilot will be adjusted further into an improved and enhanced version of the SAPROF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231196572\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231196572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

保护性因素现在通常包括在综合风险评估中。本研究涉及新的SAPROF-扩展版本(SAPROF- ev)试点的初步验证，包含对原始SAPROF的修改和补充。对139例法医精神科住院患者进行了saprofo - ev试点和HCR-20V3评估结果与攻击事件的比较。结果显示，SAPROF- ev试验对所有结果的预测效度都很好，在HCR-20V3上，(修改的)原始sapprof和完整SAPROF- ev试验的预测效度都是递增的。对于结果对他人的攻击性，额外的sapro - ev因子比(修改的)原始SAPROF具有递增的预测效度。此外，来自临床医生的用户反馈强调了经验丰富的治疗指导新因素的附加价值。根据这项研究的结果，sapro - ev试点将进一步调整为SAPROF的改进和增强版本。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Protective Factors in Forensic Practice: The Added Value of the SAPROF-Extended Version Pilot in Relation to Aggressive Incidents

Protective factors are now commonly included in comprehensive risk assessment. This study concerns an initial validation of the new SAPROF-Extended Version (SAPROF-EV) pilot, containing modifications and additions to the original SAPROF. For 139 forensic psychiatric inpatients, assessment results with the SAPROF-EV pilot and HCR-20V3 were compared with aggressive incidents. Results show good predictive validity for the SAPROF-EV pilot for all outcomes and incremental predictive validity for both the (modified) original SAPROF and the full SAPROF-EV pilot over the HCR-20V3. For the outcome aggression toward others, the additional SAPROF-EV factors provide incremental predictive validity over the (modified) original SAPROF. In addition, the user feedback from clinicians highlights experienced additional value of the new factors for treatment guidance. Based on the findings from this study, the SAPROF-EV pilot will be adjusted further into an improved and enhanced version of the SAPROF.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Criminal Justice and Behavior Multiple-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

4.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Criminal Justice and Behavior publishes articles examining psychological and behavioral aspects of the juvenile and criminal justice systems. The concepts "criminal justice" and "behavior" should be interpreted broadly to include analyses of etiology of delinquent or criminal behavior, the process of law violation, victimology, offender classification and treatment, deterrence, and incapacitation.