宗教法庭对儿童监护权的判决

Chandra Darusman S, M. I. Adabi, Apri Rotin Djusfi, Phoenna Ath Thariq, Eza Aulia, Rahmat Jhowanda, Liza Agnesta Krisna
{"title":"宗教法庭对儿童监护权的判决","authors":"Chandra Darusman S, M. I. Adabi, Apri Rotin Djusfi, Phoenna Ath Thariq, Eza Aulia, Rahmat Jhowanda, Liza Agnesta Krisna","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01601.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection emphasizes that in the event of separation due to divorce and other situations without eliminating the child's relationship with his parents, the child still has the right to meet and have permanent personal contact with both parents. However, the situation that occurs in society and the existence of a legal vacuum shows that often children cannot meet their parents who have been appointed as custodians because the divorce case decision has not yet become legally binding. This normative juridical research uses statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The concept of child protection regulated in the Child Protection Act and other laws and regulations also includes the protection of children in situations of parental household conflict and protection in situations where the legal process against parental household conflicts is still ongoing and has no permanent legal force. The researcher recommends a change to the Law on Religious Courts. In this case, it is necessary to add legal norms that stipulate those children must be handed over to parents who are holders of custody since the court decision is pronounced, or the issuance of a Supreme Court Rule as the legal basis for implementing execution.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA YANG BELUM INKRACHT BERKENAAN DENGAN HAK ASUH ANAK\",\"authors\":\"Chandra Darusman S, M. I. Adabi, Apri Rotin Djusfi, Phoenna Ath Thariq, Eza Aulia, Rahmat Jhowanda, Liza Agnesta Krisna\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01601.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection emphasizes that in the event of separation due to divorce and other situations without eliminating the child's relationship with his parents, the child still has the right to meet and have permanent personal contact with both parents. However, the situation that occurs in society and the existence of a legal vacuum shows that often children cannot meet their parents who have been appointed as custodians because the divorce case decision has not yet become legally binding. This normative juridical research uses statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The concept of child protection regulated in the Child Protection Act and other laws and regulations also includes the protection of children in situations of parental household conflict and protection in situations where the legal process against parental household conflicts is still ongoing and has no permanent legal force. The researcher recommends a change to the Law on Religious Courts. In this case, it is necessary to add legal norms that stipulate those children must be handed over to parents who are holders of custody since the court decision is pronounced, or the issuance of a Supreme Court Rule as the legal basis for implementing execution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arena Hukum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arena Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01601.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arena Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01601.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2002年关于儿童保护的第23号法律强调,如果因离婚和其他情况而分居,但没有消除儿童与父母的关系,儿童仍然有权与父母双方见面并保持永久的个人联系。然而,社会上出现的情况和法律真空的存在表明,由于离婚案件的裁决尚未具有法律约束力,儿童往往无法与被指定为监护人的父母见面。本规范性司法研究采用了法定方法和概念方法。《儿童保护法》和其他法律法规规定的儿童保护概念还包括在父母与家庭发生冲突的情况下保护儿童,以及在针对父母与家庭冲突的法律程序仍在进行且没有永久法律效力的情况下提供保护。研究人员建议修改《宗教法院法》。在这种情况下,有必要增加法律规范,规定自法院判决宣布或发布最高法院规则作为执行死刑的法律依据以来,必须将这些儿童移交给监护权持有人的父母。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA YANG BELUM INKRACHT BERKENAAN DENGAN HAK ASUH ANAK
Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection emphasizes that in the event of separation due to divorce and other situations without eliminating the child's relationship with his parents, the child still has the right to meet and have permanent personal contact with both parents. However, the situation that occurs in society and the existence of a legal vacuum shows that often children cannot meet their parents who have been appointed as custodians because the divorce case decision has not yet become legally binding. This normative juridical research uses statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The concept of child protection regulated in the Child Protection Act and other laws and regulations also includes the protection of children in situations of parental household conflict and protection in situations where the legal process against parental household conflicts is still ongoing and has no permanent legal force. The researcher recommends a change to the Law on Religious Courts. In this case, it is necessary to add legal norms that stipulate those children must be handed over to parents who are holders of custody since the court decision is pronounced, or the issuance of a Supreme Court Rule as the legal basis for implementing execution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信