Rey-Osterrieth复形检验在区分脑肿瘤和脑卒中引起的左右病变中的应用

Q3 Medicine
S. Galić, K. Matešić, B. Vuković
{"title":"Rey-Osterrieth复形检验在区分脑肿瘤和脑卒中引起的左右病变中的应用","authors":"S. Galić, K. Matešić, B. Vuković","doi":"10.20471/may.2022.58.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to examine whether the ROCF qualitative scoring system developed by Loring, Lee and Meador for differentiating complex partial seizures originating from either the right or left temporal lobe is effective in differentiating left-sided and right-sided brain lesions that are the result of cerebrovascular insult or brain tumours. We were also interested in determining whether this scoring system, which was developed for scoring trials with delayed recall, could be applied to trials with immediate recall and copying. The study consisted of 24 participants with lesions of the left hemisphere and 33 participants with right-sided lesions. Participants with right-sided lesions had a significantly greater number of qualitative errors in copying, immediate and delayed recall, and these three variables are the major contributors in distinguishing between groups. Based on these variables and quantitative results on copying, immediate and delayed recall, we were able to correctly classify 78.3 % of participants with left-sided lesions and 66.7 % of participants with right-sided lesions. Given that more than 90 % of participants with left-sided lesions had two or more errors in delayed recall, it is clear that the criterion of two or more errors which was set by Loring, Lee and Meador for patients with a right-sided focus in epilepsy is not applicable to patients with tumours and strokes. These results do not confirm the usefulness of qualitative errors for distinguishing left-sided and right-sided lesions caused by a tumour or stroke, except, perhaps, in cases of very high results (six or more errors) and when one of these errors is error X in immediate and/or delayed recall.","PeriodicalId":8294,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatry Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test in Differentiating Between Left and Right Lesions Caused by Brain Tumors and Stroke\",\"authors\":\"S. Galić, K. Matešić, B. Vuković\",\"doi\":\"10.20471/may.2022.58.02.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to examine whether the ROCF qualitative scoring system developed by Loring, Lee and Meador for differentiating complex partial seizures originating from either the right or left temporal lobe is effective in differentiating left-sided and right-sided brain lesions that are the result of cerebrovascular insult or brain tumours. We were also interested in determining whether this scoring system, which was developed for scoring trials with delayed recall, could be applied to trials with immediate recall and copying. The study consisted of 24 participants with lesions of the left hemisphere and 33 participants with right-sided lesions. Participants with right-sided lesions had a significantly greater number of qualitative errors in copying, immediate and delayed recall, and these three variables are the major contributors in distinguishing between groups. Based on these variables and quantitative results on copying, immediate and delayed recall, we were able to correctly classify 78.3 % of participants with left-sided lesions and 66.7 % of participants with right-sided lesions. Given that more than 90 % of participants with left-sided lesions had two or more errors in delayed recall, it is clear that the criterion of two or more errors which was set by Loring, Lee and Meador for patients with a right-sided focus in epilepsy is not applicable to patients with tumours and strokes. These results do not confirm the usefulness of qualitative errors for distinguishing left-sided and right-sided lesions caused by a tumour or stroke, except, perhaps, in cases of very high results (six or more errors) and when one of these errors is error X in immediate and/or delayed recall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Psychiatry Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Psychiatry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20471/may.2022.58.02.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20471/may.2022.58.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是检验由Loring、Lee和Meador开发的用于鉴别源自左右颞叶的复杂部分性癫痫发作的ROCF定性评分系统是否能有效地鉴别由脑血管损伤或脑肿瘤引起的左右脑病变。我们也有兴趣确定这个评分系统,它是为延迟回忆的评分试验开发的,是否可以应用于即时回忆和复制的试验。这项研究包括24名左半球有病变的参与者和33名右半球有病变的参与者。右侧病变的参与者在复制、即时和延迟回忆方面有更多的定性错误,这三个变量是区分组间的主要因素。基于这些变量和复制、即时和延迟回忆的定量结果,我们能够正确分类78.3%的左侧病变参与者和66.7%的右侧病变参与者。考虑到超过90%的左侧病变参与者在延迟回忆中有两次或两次以上的错误,很明显,Loring、Lee和Meador为癫痫患者的右侧病灶设定的两次或两次以上错误的标准不适用于肿瘤和中风患者。这些结果并不能证实定性误差对于区分肿瘤或中风引起的左、右脑病变的有用性,除非,可能,在结果非常高的情况下(6个或更多的错误),当这些错误中的一个在立即和/或延迟回忆中是错误X。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test in Differentiating Between Left and Right Lesions Caused by Brain Tumors and Stroke
The aim of this study was to examine whether the ROCF qualitative scoring system developed by Loring, Lee and Meador for differentiating complex partial seizures originating from either the right or left temporal lobe is effective in differentiating left-sided and right-sided brain lesions that are the result of cerebrovascular insult or brain tumours. We were also interested in determining whether this scoring system, which was developed for scoring trials with delayed recall, could be applied to trials with immediate recall and copying. The study consisted of 24 participants with lesions of the left hemisphere and 33 participants with right-sided lesions. Participants with right-sided lesions had a significantly greater number of qualitative errors in copying, immediate and delayed recall, and these three variables are the major contributors in distinguishing between groups. Based on these variables and quantitative results on copying, immediate and delayed recall, we were able to correctly classify 78.3 % of participants with left-sided lesions and 66.7 % of participants with right-sided lesions. Given that more than 90 % of participants with left-sided lesions had two or more errors in delayed recall, it is clear that the criterion of two or more errors which was set by Loring, Lee and Meador for patients with a right-sided focus in epilepsy is not applicable to patients with tumours and strokes. These results do not confirm the usefulness of qualitative errors for distinguishing left-sided and right-sided lesions caused by a tumour or stroke, except, perhaps, in cases of very high results (six or more errors) and when one of these errors is error X in immediate and/or delayed recall.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Psychiatry Research
Archives of Psychiatry Research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信