复杂化学混合物:评估人类健康不良影响的方法

IF 6.1 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Ehab Mustafa, Maria João Valente, Anne Marie Vinggaard
{"title":"复杂化学混合物:评估人类健康不良影响的方法","authors":"Ehab Mustafa,&nbsp;Maria João Valente,&nbsp;Anne Marie Vinggaard","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2023.100404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this opinion, we provide a brief overview of three main approaches for assessing effects of chemical mixtures on human health, such as experimental or theoretical component-based or whole mixture studies. We compare the purposes, pros, and cons of the approaches and highlight the recent advances within the field that focus on “real-life” exposures for risk-assessing chemical mixtures. Whole mixture studies combined with effect-directed analysis have been used mostly within ecotoxicology and less so within human toxicology, opening the potential for the determination of mixture drivers in human tissues. Concerning the implementation of mixture risk assessment in legislation, we discuss whether a data-driven factor, for example<em>,</em> a mixture driver factor for each chemical or chemical class could be useful when deriving the toxicologically acceptable limit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100404"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex chemical mixtures: Approaches for assessing adverse human health effects\",\"authors\":\"Ehab Mustafa,&nbsp;Maria João Valente,&nbsp;Anne Marie Vinggaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cotox.2023.100404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this opinion, we provide a brief overview of three main approaches for assessing effects of chemical mixtures on human health, such as experimental or theoretical component-based or whole mixture studies. We compare the purposes, pros, and cons of the approaches and highlight the recent advances within the field that focus on “real-life” exposures for risk-assessing chemical mixtures. Whole mixture studies combined with effect-directed analysis have been used mostly within ecotoxicology and less so within human toxicology, opening the potential for the determination of mixture drivers in human tissues. Concerning the implementation of mixture risk assessment in legislation, we discuss whether a data-driven factor, for example<em>,</em> a mixture driver factor for each chemical or chemical class could be useful when deriving the toxicologically acceptable limit.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202023000190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202023000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本意见中,我们简要概述了评估化学混合物对人类健康影响的三种主要方法,例如基于组分的实验或理论研究或整个混合物研究。我们比较了这些方法的目的、优点和缺点,并重点介绍了该领域内关注“现实生活”暴露风险评估化学混合物的最新进展。结合效应导向分析的全混合物研究主要用于生态毒理学,较少用于人体毒理学,为确定人体组织中的混合物驱动因素开辟了潜力。关于在立法中实施混合物风险评估,我们讨论了数据驱动因素,例如,每种化学品或化学类别的混合物驱动因素在推导毒理学上可接受的限值时是否有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex chemical mixtures: Approaches for assessing adverse human health effects

In this opinion, we provide a brief overview of three main approaches for assessing effects of chemical mixtures on human health, such as experimental or theoretical component-based or whole mixture studies. We compare the purposes, pros, and cons of the approaches and highlight the recent advances within the field that focus on “real-life” exposures for risk-assessing chemical mixtures. Whole mixture studies combined with effect-directed analysis have been used mostly within ecotoxicology and less so within human toxicology, opening the potential for the determination of mixture drivers in human tissues. Concerning the implementation of mixture risk assessment in legislation, we discuss whether a data-driven factor, for example, a mixture driver factor for each chemical or chemical class could be useful when deriving the toxicologically acceptable limit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信