将军吗?企业权力分享,自由投票权和科索沃最高法院

IF 1.2 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES
D. Bochsler
{"title":"将军吗?企业权力分享,自由投票权和科索沃最高法院","authors":"D. Bochsler","doi":"10.1080/17449057.2022.2093563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT After the 2021 parliamentary elections, the Kosovo Supreme Court annulled some 5800 votes expressed for three minority lists running for guaranteed seats of the Bosniak and the Roma minorities. The court considered it impossible that they were cast by members of the respective ethnic communities. This court ruling has wider implications for consociational theory, as it makes novel normative prescriptions about group representation in divided societies. The debate in Kosovo closely mirrors similar controversies elsewhere, such as the ‘Sejdić-Finci’ case in the elections of the state presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, or the reserved parliamentary seats in Lebanon.","PeriodicalId":46452,"journal":{"name":"Ethnopolitics","volume":"22 1","pages":"589 - 605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Checkmate? Corporate Power-Sharing, Liberal Voting Rights and the Kosovo Supreme Court\",\"authors\":\"D. Bochsler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17449057.2022.2093563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT After the 2021 parliamentary elections, the Kosovo Supreme Court annulled some 5800 votes expressed for three minority lists running for guaranteed seats of the Bosniak and the Roma minorities. The court considered it impossible that they were cast by members of the respective ethnic communities. This court ruling has wider implications for consociational theory, as it makes novel normative prescriptions about group representation in divided societies. The debate in Kosovo closely mirrors similar controversies elsewhere, such as the ‘Sejdić-Finci’ case in the elections of the state presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, or the reserved parliamentary seats in Lebanon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnopolitics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"589 - 605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnopolitics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2093563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnopolitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2093563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在2021年的议会选举之后,科索沃最高法院取消了大约5800张选票,这些选票投给了三个少数民族名单,以争夺波斯尼亚和罗姆少数民族的保证席位。法院认为它们不可能是由各自种族社区的成员所投。法院的这一裁决对联合理论有着更广泛的影响,因为它对分裂社会中的群体代表做出了新的规范规定。科索沃的辩论与其他地方类似的争议密切相关,例如波黑国家总统选举中的“Sejdić-Finci”案例,或黎巴嫩的议会保留席位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Checkmate? Corporate Power-Sharing, Liberal Voting Rights and the Kosovo Supreme Court
ABSTRACT After the 2021 parliamentary elections, the Kosovo Supreme Court annulled some 5800 votes expressed for three minority lists running for guaranteed seats of the Bosniak and the Roma minorities. The court considered it impossible that they were cast by members of the respective ethnic communities. This court ruling has wider implications for consociational theory, as it makes novel normative prescriptions about group representation in divided societies. The debate in Kosovo closely mirrors similar controversies elsewhere, such as the ‘Sejdić-Finci’ case in the elections of the state presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, or the reserved parliamentary seats in Lebanon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnopolitics
Ethnopolitics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信