东亚母亲对英国子女教育的态度——东亚与英国教育的辩证法

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Hyunbin Lim
{"title":"东亚母亲对英国子女教育的态度——东亚与英国教育的辩证法","authors":"Hyunbin Lim","doi":"10.1080/13229400.2022.2076605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores how middle-class migrant East Asian mothers approach their children’s education in England, where educational culture is perceived to be considerably different from East Asia. Based on dichotomous perceptions about East Asian and English education cultures, dialectical perspectives were used to analyse the life history interview data, particularly four dialectical frameworks developed by [Baxter, L.A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071004]: selection, separation, neutralization, and reframing. In order to release tensions arising from the two-perceived different educational systems these mothers used different dialectical strategies. The paper argues that East Asian mothers’ behaviour towards their children’s education cannot be categorized using a uniform cultural framework and a diasporic space provides multiple possibilities for exercising divergent approaches for them.","PeriodicalId":46462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"1722 - 1743"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"East Asian Mothers’ attitudes towards their children’s education in England: dialectics of East Asian and English education\",\"authors\":\"Hyunbin Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13229400.2022.2076605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explores how middle-class migrant East Asian mothers approach their children’s education in England, where educational culture is perceived to be considerably different from East Asia. Based on dichotomous perceptions about East Asian and English education cultures, dialectical perspectives were used to analyse the life history interview data, particularly four dialectical frameworks developed by [Baxter, L.A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071004]: selection, separation, neutralization, and reframing. In order to release tensions arising from the two-perceived different educational systems these mothers used different dialectical strategies. The paper argues that East Asian mothers’ behaviour towards their children’s education cannot be categorized using a uniform cultural framework and a diasporic space provides multiple possibilities for exercising divergent approaches for them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Studies\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"1722 - 1743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2022.2076605\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2022.2076605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究探讨了东亚中产阶级移民母亲在英国如何对待孩子的教育,英国的教育文化与东亚截然不同。基于对东亚和英国教育文化的二分法认知,使用辩证法视角分析生活史访谈数据,特别是[Baxter,L.A.(1990)开发的四个辩证框架。关系发展中的辩证矛盾。社会与个人关系杂志,7,69-88。https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071004]:选择、分离、中和和重构。为了缓解由两种不同的教育体系引起的紧张关系,这些母亲使用了不同的辩证策略。该论文认为,东亚母亲对子女教育的行为不能使用统一的文化框架进行分类,流散空间为她们采取不同的方法提供了多种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
East Asian Mothers’ attitudes towards their children’s education in England: dialectics of East Asian and English education
ABSTRACT This study explores how middle-class migrant East Asian mothers approach their children’s education in England, where educational culture is perceived to be considerably different from East Asia. Based on dichotomous perceptions about East Asian and English education cultures, dialectical perspectives were used to analyse the life history interview data, particularly four dialectical frameworks developed by [Baxter, L.A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071004]: selection, separation, neutralization, and reframing. In order to release tensions arising from the two-perceived different educational systems these mothers used different dialectical strategies. The paper argues that East Asian mothers’ behaviour towards their children’s education cannot be categorized using a uniform cultural framework and a diasporic space provides multiple possibilities for exercising divergent approaches for them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family Studies
Journal of Family Studies FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Studies is a peer reviewed international journal under the Editorship of Adjunct Professor Lawrie Moloney, School of Public Health, LaTrobe University; Australian Institute of Family Studies; and co-director of Children in Focus. The focus of the Journal of Family Studies is on the wellbeing of children in families in the process of change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信