观念与政党变革:预分配在劳工思想更新中的作用

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
E. Goes
{"title":"观念与政党变革:预分配在劳工思想更新中的作用","authors":"E. Goes","doi":"10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The literature on political parties and ideologies tends to highlight the instrumental nature of that relationship. In those accounts, political parties are either constrained by ideology or they use ideology to fit their power-seeking strategies. But there is a third dimension in this relationship that has been overlooked and which reveals key and interesting insights about how political parties contribute to the production of ideologies. This article seeks to contribute to the growing literature on the relationship between political parties and ideologies by proposing a new methodological approach, which combines V. A. Schmidt’s discursive institutionalism and Peter A. Hall’s historical institutionalism, to study how political parties engage in processes of ideological production. This methodological approach, is applied to the analysis of how the idea of ‘predistribution’ shaped party change in the Labour Party under Ed Miliband, shows: a) how political parties use ideas to make sense of the world and to address specific political challenges they face; b) how political parties link zeitgeist ideas to their own ideological traditions; c) how parties try to renew ideological traditions whilst pursuing other goals.","PeriodicalId":47036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Ideologies","volume":"26 1","pages":"180 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideas and party change: the role of predistribution in labour’s ideological renewal\",\"authors\":\"E. Goes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The literature on political parties and ideologies tends to highlight the instrumental nature of that relationship. In those accounts, political parties are either constrained by ideology or they use ideology to fit their power-seeking strategies. But there is a third dimension in this relationship that has been overlooked and which reveals key and interesting insights about how political parties contribute to the production of ideologies. This article seeks to contribute to the growing literature on the relationship between political parties and ideologies by proposing a new methodological approach, which combines V. A. Schmidt’s discursive institutionalism and Peter A. Hall’s historical institutionalism, to study how political parties engage in processes of ideological production. This methodological approach, is applied to the analysis of how the idea of ‘predistribution’ shaped party change in the Labour Party under Ed Miliband, shows: a) how political parties use ideas to make sense of the world and to address specific political challenges they face; b) how political parties link zeitgeist ideas to their own ideological traditions; c) how parties try to renew ideological traditions whilst pursuing other goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Ideologies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"180 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Ideologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Ideologies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于政党和意识形态的文献倾向于强调这种关系的工具性质。在这些说法中,政党要么受到意识形态的限制,要么利用意识形态来适应他们的权力寻求策略。但在这种关系中,还有第三个维度被忽视了,它揭示了政党如何促进意识形态产生的关键和有趣的见解。本文试图通过提出一种新的方法方法,结合v·a·施密特的话语制度主义和彼得·a·霍尔的历史制度主义,来研究政党如何参与意识形态生产过程,从而为越来越多的关于政党与意识形态之间关系的文献做出贡献。这种方法论方法被应用于分析埃德·米利班德(Ed Miliband)领导下的工党的“预分配”思想是如何影响政党变革的,它表明:a)政党如何利用思想来理解世界,并解决他们面临的具体政治挑战;B)政党如何将时代精神与他们自己的意识形态传统联系起来;C)政党如何在追求其他目标的同时试图更新意识形态传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideas and party change: the role of predistribution in labour’s ideological renewal
ABSTRACT The literature on political parties and ideologies tends to highlight the instrumental nature of that relationship. In those accounts, political parties are either constrained by ideology or they use ideology to fit their power-seeking strategies. But there is a third dimension in this relationship that has been overlooked and which reveals key and interesting insights about how political parties contribute to the production of ideologies. This article seeks to contribute to the growing literature on the relationship between political parties and ideologies by proposing a new methodological approach, which combines V. A. Schmidt’s discursive institutionalism and Peter A. Hall’s historical institutionalism, to study how political parties engage in processes of ideological production. This methodological approach, is applied to the analysis of how the idea of ‘predistribution’ shaped party change in the Labour Party under Ed Miliband, shows: a) how political parties use ideas to make sense of the world and to address specific political challenges they face; b) how political parties link zeitgeist ideas to their own ideological traditions; c) how parties try to renew ideological traditions whilst pursuing other goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Ideologies
Journal of Political Ideologies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Political Ideologies is dedicated to the analysis of political ideology both in its theoretical and conceptual aspects, and with reference to the nature and roles of concrete ideological manifestations and practices. The journal serves as a major discipline-developing vehicle for an innovative, growing and vital field in political studies, exploring new methodologies and illuminating the complexity and richness of ideological structures and solutions that form, and are formed by, political thinking and political imagination. Concurrently, the journal supports a broad research agenda aimed at building inter-disciplinary bridges with relevant areas and invigorating cross-disciplinary debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信