特别档案编辑介绍土耳其的性别、护理和工作:从家庭主义到新家长主义

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
S. Dedeoğlu
{"title":"特别档案编辑介绍土耳其的性别、护理和工作:从家庭主义到新家长主义","authors":"S. Dedeoğlu","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concerted efforts in recent years to change the division of care responsibilities currently shouldered by women and the quest to establish a new balance among providers of care — the family, the market, and the state — have topped the social policy agenda in many contexts. These attempts are based on the well-established fact that women ’ s caring responsibilities profoundly affect their labor market participation. Feminist researchers have modeled the welfare states as to their response to meet the care needs of families. Lewis ’ s (1992) male breadwinner model in which women bear the sole responsibility for domestic tasks and child care, and remain outside labor markets presents the most widespread model of care in the world. However, it was later modified to include variations of the one-and-a-half breadwinner and dual earner household models. In Sainsbury ’ s (1994) model, welfare states are typologies, whether they support women as wives, mothers, or workers. Orloff (1993) sets the criteria to evaluate the gender welfare regime according to whether it enables a woman to move out and set up her own home. In addition, Jensen (1997) suggests a focus on care, rather than on work/welfare, and makes distinctions between three sets of questions: Who cares? Who pays? How much is provided? These various mod-els all have a focus on the relationship between the structure of the welfare state and women ’ s paid work, and explain the role of the state in determining women ’ s economic activities. More recently, gender analysis has focused on how increasing rates of female employment have affected care and welfare regimes worldwide. For example, Esping analyzes the “ new gender contract ” that has emerged in post-industrial societies in which women-friendly policies and child-centered social investment have resulted in the disappearance of housewifery as well as institutional developments in labor market regulation and social policy.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"4 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special dossier editor’s introduction Gender, care, and work in Turkey: from familialism to neo-paternalism\",\"authors\":\"S. Dedeoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/npt.2022.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concerted efforts in recent years to change the division of care responsibilities currently shouldered by women and the quest to establish a new balance among providers of care — the family, the market, and the state — have topped the social policy agenda in many contexts. These attempts are based on the well-established fact that women ’ s caring responsibilities profoundly affect their labor market participation. Feminist researchers have modeled the welfare states as to their response to meet the care needs of families. Lewis ’ s (1992) male breadwinner model in which women bear the sole responsibility for domestic tasks and child care, and remain outside labor markets presents the most widespread model of care in the world. However, it was later modified to include variations of the one-and-a-half breadwinner and dual earner household models. In Sainsbury ’ s (1994) model, welfare states are typologies, whether they support women as wives, mothers, or workers. Orloff (1993) sets the criteria to evaluate the gender welfare regime according to whether it enables a woman to move out and set up her own home. In addition, Jensen (1997) suggests a focus on care, rather than on work/welfare, and makes distinctions between three sets of questions: Who cares? Who pays? How much is provided? These various mod-els all have a focus on the relationship between the structure of the welfare state and women ’ s paid work, and explain the role of the state in determining women ’ s economic activities. More recently, gender analysis has focused on how increasing rates of female employment have affected care and welfare regimes worldwide. For example, Esping analyzes the “ new gender contract ” that has emerged in post-industrial societies in which women-friendly policies and child-centered social investment have resulted in the disappearance of housewifery as well as institutional developments in labor market regulation and social policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Perspectives on Turkey\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"4 - 10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Perspectives on Turkey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.11\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives on Turkey","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.11","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,为了改变目前由妇女承担的护理责任分工,并寻求在家庭、市场和国家等护理提供者之间建立新的平衡,做出了一致努力,这在许多情况下都是社会政策议程上的首要任务。这些尝试是基于一个公认的事实,即女性的照顾责任深刻影响了她们的劳动力市场参与。女权主义研究人员对福利国家满足家庭护理需求的反应进行了建模。Lewis(1992)提出的男性养家糊口模式是世界上最普遍的照顾模式,其中女性承担家务和照顾孩子的唯一责任,并留在劳动力市场之外。然而,它后来被修改为包括一个半养家糊口者和双职工家庭模式的变体。在塞恩斯伯里(1994)的模型中,福利国家是一种类型,无论它们支持女性作为妻子、母亲还是工人。Orloff(1993)根据性别福利制度是否使妇女能够搬出去建立自己的家,制定了评估性别福利制度的标准。此外,Jensen(1997)建议关注护理,而不是工作/福利,并区分了三组问题:谁在乎?谁买单?提供了多少?这些不同的模式都关注福利国家结构与妇女有偿工作之间的关系,并解释了国家在决定妇女经济活动中的作用。最近,性别分析的重点是女性就业率的提高如何影响世界各地的护理和福利制度。例如,埃斯平分析了后工业社会中出现的“新性别契约”,在后工业社会,女性友好政策和以儿童为中心的社会投资导致了家庭主妇的消失,以及劳动力市场监管和社会政策的制度发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special dossier editor’s introduction Gender, care, and work in Turkey: from familialism to neo-paternalism
The concerted efforts in recent years to change the division of care responsibilities currently shouldered by women and the quest to establish a new balance among providers of care — the family, the market, and the state — have topped the social policy agenda in many contexts. These attempts are based on the well-established fact that women ’ s caring responsibilities profoundly affect their labor market participation. Feminist researchers have modeled the welfare states as to their response to meet the care needs of families. Lewis ’ s (1992) male breadwinner model in which women bear the sole responsibility for domestic tasks and child care, and remain outside labor markets presents the most widespread model of care in the world. However, it was later modified to include variations of the one-and-a-half breadwinner and dual earner household models. In Sainsbury ’ s (1994) model, welfare states are typologies, whether they support women as wives, mothers, or workers. Orloff (1993) sets the criteria to evaluate the gender welfare regime according to whether it enables a woman to move out and set up her own home. In addition, Jensen (1997) suggests a focus on care, rather than on work/welfare, and makes distinctions between three sets of questions: Who cares? Who pays? How much is provided? These various mod-els all have a focus on the relationship between the structure of the welfare state and women ’ s paid work, and explain the role of the state in determining women ’ s economic activities. More recently, gender analysis has focused on how increasing rates of female employment have affected care and welfare regimes worldwide. For example, Esping analyzes the “ new gender contract ” that has emerged in post-industrial societies in which women-friendly policies and child-centered social investment have resulted in the disappearance of housewifery as well as institutional developments in labor market regulation and social policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Perspectives on Turkey
New Perspectives on Turkey SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信