泰国家庭规模对儿童投资的影响:以另一种方法重新审视

IF 1 4区经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS

Asian Economic Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-21 DOI:10.1111/asej.12281

Aeggarchat Sirisankanan

{"title":"泰国家庭规模对儿童投资的影响:以另一种方法重新审视","authors":"Aeggarchat Sirisankanan","doi":"10.1111/asej.12281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most economics research have concentrated on testing the quality–quantity (QQ) model through the relationship between family size and children's schooling. Much less effort has been given to comparing the child quality and child quantity income elasticities. Using the Thai household socioeconomic panel surveys, this paper examines the trade-off between the quality and quantity of children by comparing the child quality and child quantity income elasticities. According to the theoretical prediction, the results showed that quality income elasticity was evidently higher than quantity income elasticity. Moreover, quality income elasticity was higher than quantity income elasticity even if permanent income was also controlled.</p>","PeriodicalId":45838,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Journal","volume":"36 4","pages":"411-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of family size on child investment in Thailand: Revisiting with an alternative approach\",\"authors\":\"Aeggarchat Sirisankanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/asej.12281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Most economics research have concentrated on testing the quality–quantity (QQ) model through the relationship between family size and children's schooling. Much less effort has been given to comparing the child quality and child quantity income elasticities. Using the Thai household socioeconomic panel surveys, this paper examines the trade-off between the quality and quantity of children by comparing the child quality and child quantity income elasticities. According to the theoretical prediction, the results showed that quality income elasticity was evidently higher than quantity income elasticity. Moreover, quality income elasticity was higher than quantity income elasticity even if permanent income was also controlled.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"411-431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asej.12281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asej.12281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数经济学研究都集中在通过家庭规模与子女受教育程度之间的关系来检验质量-数量(QQ)模型。比较儿童质量和儿童数量收入弹性的努力要少得多。本文利用泰国家庭社会经济面板调查，通过比较儿童质量和儿童数量的收入弹性来检验儿童质量和数量之间的权衡。根据理论预测，结果表明，质量收入弹性明显高于数量收入弹性。此外，即使对永久性收入进行控制，质量收入弹性也高于数量收入弹性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The impact of family size on child investment in Thailand: Revisiting with an alternative approach

Most economics research have concentrated on testing the quality–quantity (QQ) model through the relationship between family size and children's schooling. Much less effort has been given to comparing the child quality and child quantity income elasticities. Using the Thai household socioeconomic panel surveys, this paper examines the trade-off between the quality and quantity of children by comparing the child quality and child quantity income elasticities. According to the theoretical prediction, the results showed that quality income elasticity was evidently higher than quantity income elasticity. Moreover, quality income elasticity was higher than quantity income elasticity even if permanent income was also controlled.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asian Economic Journal ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Asian Economic Journal provides detailed coverage of a wide range of topics in economics relating to East Asia, including investigation of current research, international comparisons and country studies. It is a forum for debate amongst theorists, practitioners and researchers and publishes high-quality theoretical, empirical and policy orientated contributions. The Asian Economic Journal facilitates the exchange of information among researchers on a world-wide basis and offers a unique opportunity for economists to keep abreast of research on economics pertaining to East Asia.