肾内逆行手术与超小型经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的疗效比较

Urologia polska Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-04 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2019.1928
Aakash Pai, Htut Aung Wai, Miriam Ali, Michael Theaker, Graham Watson, Simon Mackie
{"title":"肾内逆行手术与超小型经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的疗效比较","authors":"Aakash Pai, Htut Aung Wai, Miriam Ali, Michael Theaker, Graham Watson, Simon Mackie","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2019.1928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (umPCNL) in the management of renal calculi.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between March 2015 and January 2018, a total of 44 patients were treated with umPCNL. The outcomes of these patients were compared with 75 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median stone size was 9 mm in the umPCNL group and 7 mm in the RIRS group. Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 85% of patients for the RIRS group and 98% for the umPCNL group. 16% of RIRS patients were left with a ureteric stent, whilst 7% of patients (n = 5) needed a second RIRS. One patient in the umPCNL group was left with a percutaneous nephrostomy; all other patients were left totally tubeless. The mean operative time was 66 minutes in the RIRS group and 55 minutes in the umPCNL group (p = 0.04). The minor complication rates for the RIRS and umPCNL groups were 17% and 15%, respectively. One patient in the RIRS group required postoperative nephrostomy insertion; there were no major complications in the umPCNL group. The median length of stay was 0 days in the RIRS group and 1 day in the umPCNL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall study showed that umPCNL has low complication rates and good stone-free rates, with a lower requirement for ancilliary procedures. UmPCNL is an acceptable alternative in selected patients with small- to moderate-sized renal calculi.</p>","PeriodicalId":86295,"journal":{"name":"Urologia polska","volume":"72 1","pages":"169-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi.\",\"authors\":\"Aakash Pai, Htut Aung Wai, Miriam Ali, Michael Theaker, Graham Watson, Simon Mackie\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2019.1928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (umPCNL) in the management of renal calculi.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between March 2015 and January 2018, a total of 44 patients were treated with umPCNL. The outcomes of these patients were compared with 75 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median stone size was 9 mm in the umPCNL group and 7 mm in the RIRS group. Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 85% of patients for the RIRS group and 98% for the umPCNL group. 16% of RIRS patients were left with a ureteric stent, whilst 7% of patients (n = 5) needed a second RIRS. One patient in the umPCNL group was left with a percutaneous nephrostomy; all other patients were left totally tubeless. The mean operative time was 66 minutes in the RIRS group and 55 minutes in the umPCNL group (p = 0.04). The minor complication rates for the RIRS and umPCNL groups were 17% and 15%, respectively. One patient in the RIRS group required postoperative nephrostomy insertion; there were no major complications in the umPCNL group. The median length of stay was 0 days in the RIRS group and 1 day in the umPCNL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall study showed that umPCNL has low complication rates and good stone-free rates, with a lower requirement for ancilliary procedures. UmPCNL is an acceptable alternative in selected patients with small- to moderate-sized renal calculi.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":86295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia polska\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"169-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715084/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言评价肾内逆行手术(RIRS)和超小型经皮肾取石术(umPCNL)治疗肾结石的疗效。材料和方法2015年3月至2018年1月,共有44名患者接受了umPCNL治疗。将这些患者的结果与同期接受肾结石RIRS的75名患者进行比较。结果umPCNL组中位结石大小为9mm,RIRS组中位为7mm。RIRS组85%的患者和umPCNL组98%的患者单次手术后无结石发生率。16%的RIRS患者留有输尿管支架,而7%的患者(n=5)需要第二次RIRS。umPCNL组的一名患者接受了经皮肾造瘘术;所有其他患者都完全没有插管。RIRS组和umPCNL组的平均手术时间分别为66分钟和55分钟(p=0.04)。RIRS组中有一名患者需要在术后插入肾造口术;umPCNL组无明显并发症。RIRS组的中位住院时间为0天,umPCNL组为1天。结论总体研究表明umPCNL并发症发生率低,结石清除率高,对辅助手术的要求较低。UmPCNL是中小型肾结石患者可接受的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi.

Introduction: To evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (umPCNL) in the management of renal calculi.

Material and methods: Between March 2015 and January 2018, a total of 44 patients were treated with umPCNL. The outcomes of these patients were compared with 75 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi during the same time period.

Results: Median stone size was 9 mm in the umPCNL group and 7 mm in the RIRS group. Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 85% of patients for the RIRS group and 98% for the umPCNL group. 16% of RIRS patients were left with a ureteric stent, whilst 7% of patients (n = 5) needed a second RIRS. One patient in the umPCNL group was left with a percutaneous nephrostomy; all other patients were left totally tubeless. The mean operative time was 66 minutes in the RIRS group and 55 minutes in the umPCNL group (p = 0.04). The minor complication rates for the RIRS and umPCNL groups were 17% and 15%, respectively. One patient in the RIRS group required postoperative nephrostomy insertion; there were no major complications in the umPCNL group. The median length of stay was 0 days in the RIRS group and 1 day in the umPCNL group.

Conclusions: The overall study showed that umPCNL has low complication rates and good stone-free rates, with a lower requirement for ancilliary procedures. UmPCNL is an acceptable alternative in selected patients with small- to moderate-sized renal calculi.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信