代表镀金时代的人类学藏品

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY

Reviews in Anthropology Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00938157.2017.1279498

A. Barker

{"title":"代表镀金时代的人类学藏品","authors":"A. Barker","doi":"10.1080/00938157.2017.1279498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this essay I review two quite different works concerning the rise of American anthropology as a discipline. Both address the display of anthropology and the ways it presented itself to the public and represented itself to the field during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and provide alternative views of the coalescence of the field. I argue that each provides valuable insights into those formation processes without fully coming to grips with the contradictions inherent to the discipline during its formation, and which remain as fault lines in anthropological inquiry today.","PeriodicalId":43734,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Anthropology","volume":"46 1","pages":"18 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representing anthropological collections in the Gilded Age\",\"authors\":\"A. Barker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00938157.2017.1279498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this essay I review two quite different works concerning the rise of American anthropology as a discipline. Both address the display of anthropology and the ways it presented itself to the public and represented itself to the field during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and provide alternative views of the coalescence of the field. I argue that each provides valuable insights into those formation processes without fully coming to grips with the contradictions inherent to the discipline during its formation, and which remain as fault lines in anthropological inquiry today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2017.1279498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2017.1279498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中，我回顾了两部关于美国人类学作为一门学科兴起的截然不同的著作。两者都论述了人类学的展示及其在19世纪末和20世纪初向公众展示和向该领域展示自己的方式，并提供了该领域合并的另一种观点。我认为，每一种都对这些形成过程提供了有价值的见解，但没有完全把握这门学科在形成过程中固有的矛盾，这些矛盾在今天的人类学研究中仍然是断层线。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Representing anthropological collections in the Gilded Age

ABSTRACT In this essay I review two quite different works concerning the rise of American anthropology as a discipline. Both address the display of anthropology and the ways it presented itself to the public and represented itself to the field during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and provide alternative views of the coalescence of the field. I argue that each provides valuable insights into those formation processes without fully coming to grips with the contradictions inherent to the discipline during its formation, and which remain as fault lines in anthropological inquiry today.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.