规划生态公正的城市:基于自然的针对性城市设计和规划解决方案的生态不公正热点评估框架

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Melissa Pineda-Pinto, N. Frantzeskaki, M. Chandrabose, Pablo Herreros-Cantis, T. McPhearson, C. Nygaard, Christopher Raymond
{"title":"规划生态公正的城市:基于自然的针对性城市设计和规划解决方案的生态不公正热点评估框架","authors":"Melissa Pineda-Pinto, N. Frantzeskaki, M. Chandrabose, Pablo Herreros-Cantis, T. McPhearson, C. Nygaard, Christopher Raymond","doi":"10.1080/08111146.2022.2093184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents a typology of ecological injustice hotspots for targeted design of nature-based solutions to guide planning and designing of just cities. The typology demonstrates how the needs and capabilities of nonhuman nature can be embedded within transitions to multi- and interspecies relational futures that regenerate and protect urban social-ecological systems. We synthesise the findings of previous quantitative and qualitative analyses to develop the Ecologically Just Cities Framework that (1) works as a diagnostic tool to characterise four types of urban ecological injustices and (2) identifies nature-based planning actions that can best respond to different types of place-based ecological injustices.","PeriodicalId":47081,"journal":{"name":"Urban Policy and Research","volume":"40 1","pages":"206 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning Ecologically Just Cities: A Framework to Assess Ecological Injustice Hotspots for Targeted Urban Design and Planning of Nature-Based Solutions\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Pineda-Pinto, N. Frantzeskaki, M. Chandrabose, Pablo Herreros-Cantis, T. McPhearson, C. Nygaard, Christopher Raymond\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08111146.2022.2093184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper presents a typology of ecological injustice hotspots for targeted design of nature-based solutions to guide planning and designing of just cities. The typology demonstrates how the needs and capabilities of nonhuman nature can be embedded within transitions to multi- and interspecies relational futures that regenerate and protect urban social-ecological systems. We synthesise the findings of previous quantitative and qualitative analyses to develop the Ecologically Just Cities Framework that (1) works as a diagnostic tool to characterise four types of urban ecological injustices and (2) identifies nature-based planning actions that can best respond to different types of place-based ecological injustices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Policy and Research\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"206 - 222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Policy and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2022.2093184\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Policy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2022.2093184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文提出了一种生态不公正热点的类型,用于有针对性地设计基于自然的解决方案,以指导公正城市的规划和设计。该类型学展示了非人类性质的需求和能力如何嵌入到重建和保护城市社会生态系统的多物种和种间关系未来的过渡中。我们综合了之前定量和定性分析的结果,制定了生态公正城市框架,该框架(1)作为一种诊断工具,描述了四种类型的城市生态不公正,(2)确定了能够最好地应对不同类型的地方生态不公正的基于自然的规划行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planning Ecologically Just Cities: A Framework to Assess Ecological Injustice Hotspots for Targeted Urban Design and Planning of Nature-Based Solutions
ABSTRACT This paper presents a typology of ecological injustice hotspots for targeted design of nature-based solutions to guide planning and designing of just cities. The typology demonstrates how the needs and capabilities of nonhuman nature can be embedded within transitions to multi- and interspecies relational futures that regenerate and protect urban social-ecological systems. We synthesise the findings of previous quantitative and qualitative analyses to develop the Ecologically Just Cities Framework that (1) works as a diagnostic tool to characterise four types of urban ecological injustices and (2) identifies nature-based planning actions that can best respond to different types of place-based ecological injustices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信