德国记忆政治与(去)殖民思想之间的巴勒斯坦

IF 2.6 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Anonymous
{"title":"德国记忆政治与(去)殖民思想之间的巴勒斯坦","authors":"Anonymous","doi":"10.1080/14623528.2020.1847852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “Mbembe fiasco” started when Felix Klein attacked the Cameroonian philosopher and postcolonial scholar Achille Mbembe, and called for him to be disinvited from the 2020 Ruhrtriennale in Bochum. Klein acted in his federal government capacity as Commissioner for Jewish Life in Germany and the Fight Against Antisemitism. He referenced the 2015 anti-BDS resolution of the German Bundestag when he argued that Mbembe must be forbidden from participating because of his supposed relativization of the Holocaust and denial of the State of Israel to exist (Existenzrecht). Klein centred his criticism on Mbembe’s 2016 essay “The Society of Enmity” and the foreword he wrote for the 2015 publication Apartheid Israel: The Politics of Analogy. The commissioner pointed to Mbembe’s assertations that the colonial occupation of Palestine was worse, indeed “far more lethal” than Apartheid South Africa, and that the occupation of Palestine was the “biggest moral scandal of our times.” Mbembe pointed to the “most dehumanizing ordeals,” the Palestinian experiences of “carnage, destruction and incremental extermination” caused by Israel, and called for its global isolation until it respected international law. As might be expected, Mbembe rejected the claims of antisemitism or of trivializing the Shoah. While many scholars wrote in Mbembe’s defence, none of the German-language articles defended Mbembe’s thoughts on the colonial occupation of Palestine as the “most accomplished form of necropower,” the colonial management of life and death, and “the generalized instrumentalization of human existence and the material","PeriodicalId":46849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genocide Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"374 - 382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14623528.2020.1847852","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palestine Between German Memory Politics and (De-)Colonial Thought\",\"authors\":\"Anonymous\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623528.2020.1847852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The “Mbembe fiasco” started when Felix Klein attacked the Cameroonian philosopher and postcolonial scholar Achille Mbembe, and called for him to be disinvited from the 2020 Ruhrtriennale in Bochum. Klein acted in his federal government capacity as Commissioner for Jewish Life in Germany and the Fight Against Antisemitism. He referenced the 2015 anti-BDS resolution of the German Bundestag when he argued that Mbembe must be forbidden from participating because of his supposed relativization of the Holocaust and denial of the State of Israel to exist (Existenzrecht). Klein centred his criticism on Mbembe’s 2016 essay “The Society of Enmity” and the foreword he wrote for the 2015 publication Apartheid Israel: The Politics of Analogy. The commissioner pointed to Mbembe’s assertations that the colonial occupation of Palestine was worse, indeed “far more lethal” than Apartheid South Africa, and that the occupation of Palestine was the “biggest moral scandal of our times.” Mbembe pointed to the “most dehumanizing ordeals,” the Palestinian experiences of “carnage, destruction and incremental extermination” caused by Israel, and called for its global isolation until it respected international law. As might be expected, Mbembe rejected the claims of antisemitism or of trivializing the Shoah. While many scholars wrote in Mbembe’s defence, none of the German-language articles defended Mbembe’s thoughts on the colonial occupation of Palestine as the “most accomplished form of necropower,” the colonial management of life and death, and “the generalized instrumentalization of human existence and the material\",\"PeriodicalId\":46849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genocide Research\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"374 - 382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14623528.2020.1847852\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genocide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2020.1847852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genocide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2020.1847852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

“姆本贝惨败”始于菲利克斯·克莱因(Felix Klein)攻击喀麦隆哲学家、后殖民学者阿希勒·姆本贝(Achille Mbembe),并呼吁取消对他2020年波鸿鲁尔三年展的邀请。克莱因以联邦政府的身份担任德国犹太人生活和反对反犹主义专员。他引用了2015年德国联邦议院的反bds决议,他认为Mbembe必须被禁止参加,因为他对大屠杀的相对化和否认以色列国的存在(Existenzrecht)。克莱因的批评集中在Mbembe 2016年的文章《敌意社会》(The Society of enemy)和他为2015年出版的《以色列种族隔离:类比的政治》(Apartheid Israel: The Politics of Analogy)所写的前言上。专员指出,Mbembe断言,对巴勒斯坦的殖民占领比种族隔离的南非更糟糕,实际上“致命得多”,对巴勒斯坦的占领是“我们这个时代最大的道德丑闻”。Mbembe指出了"最不人道的折磨",巴勒斯坦人经历了以色列造成的"屠杀、破坏和逐渐灭绝",并呼吁在国际上孤立巴勒斯坦,直到它尊重国际法为止。正如人们所预料的那样,Mbembe拒绝了反犹太主义或轻视大屠杀的说法。虽然许多学者为Mbembe辩护,但没有一篇德语文章为Mbembe的思想辩护,认为对巴勒斯坦的殖民占领是“最成功的necropower形式”,是对生命和死亡的殖民管理,是“人类存在和物质的普遍工具化”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palestine Between German Memory Politics and (De-)Colonial Thought
The “Mbembe fiasco” started when Felix Klein attacked the Cameroonian philosopher and postcolonial scholar Achille Mbembe, and called for him to be disinvited from the 2020 Ruhrtriennale in Bochum. Klein acted in his federal government capacity as Commissioner for Jewish Life in Germany and the Fight Against Antisemitism. He referenced the 2015 anti-BDS resolution of the German Bundestag when he argued that Mbembe must be forbidden from participating because of his supposed relativization of the Holocaust and denial of the State of Israel to exist (Existenzrecht). Klein centred his criticism on Mbembe’s 2016 essay “The Society of Enmity” and the foreword he wrote for the 2015 publication Apartheid Israel: The Politics of Analogy. The commissioner pointed to Mbembe’s assertations that the colonial occupation of Palestine was worse, indeed “far more lethal” than Apartheid South Africa, and that the occupation of Palestine was the “biggest moral scandal of our times.” Mbembe pointed to the “most dehumanizing ordeals,” the Palestinian experiences of “carnage, destruction and incremental extermination” caused by Israel, and called for its global isolation until it respected international law. As might be expected, Mbembe rejected the claims of antisemitism or of trivializing the Shoah. While many scholars wrote in Mbembe’s defence, none of the German-language articles defended Mbembe’s thoughts on the colonial occupation of Palestine as the “most accomplished form of necropower,” the colonial management of life and death, and “the generalized instrumentalization of human existence and the material
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genocide Research
Journal of Genocide Research POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信