未来的备份:数据激进主义的档案实践

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Morgan E. Currie, Britt S. Paris
{"title":"未来的备份:数据激进主义的档案实践","authors":"Morgan E. Currie, Britt S. Paris","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2018.1468273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Literature on activist archiving theorises the power of recordkeeping to give voice to marginalised communities. However, missing from this archival literature are analyses about the political practice of preserving data as an act of grassroots resistance. Simultaneously, existing scholarly literature on grassroots data activism analyses the creation of new statistical representations to challenge official ones. This literature has largely ignored what will happen to this data over the long term, nor has it treated data archiving as an activist project in its own right. This theoretical article seeks to close the gap between literature on archival activism and literature on data activism, in hopes that both sets of research can draw productively from each other. There are clear affinities between activist archives and data activism: both address the failure by mainstream institutions to account for marginal voices, both have the power to make issues visible and legitimate within the public sphere, and both experiment with traditional forms of memory and statistical evidence. The authors believe that these two powerful forms of activity have much to learn from each other, particularly as the need to steward data over the long term will only grow.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"46 1","pages":"124 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2018.1468273","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back-ups for the future: archival practices for data activism\",\"authors\":\"Morgan E. Currie, Britt S. Paris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01576895.2018.1468273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Literature on activist archiving theorises the power of recordkeeping to give voice to marginalised communities. However, missing from this archival literature are analyses about the political practice of preserving data as an act of grassroots resistance. Simultaneously, existing scholarly literature on grassroots data activism analyses the creation of new statistical representations to challenge official ones. This literature has largely ignored what will happen to this data over the long term, nor has it treated data archiving as an activist project in its own right. This theoretical article seeks to close the gap between literature on archival activism and literature on data activism, in hopes that both sets of research can draw productively from each other. There are clear affinities between activist archives and data activism: both address the failure by mainstream institutions to account for marginal voices, both have the power to make issues visible and legitimate within the public sphere, and both experiment with traditional forms of memory and statistical evidence. The authors believe that these two powerful forms of activity have much to learn from each other, particularly as the need to steward data over the long term will only grow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives and Manuscripts\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"124 - 142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2018.1468273\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives and Manuscripts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1468273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1468273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

关于活动家档案的文献理论化了记录保存的力量,为边缘化社区提供了发言权。然而,这些档案文献中缺少对保存数据作为基层抵抗行为的政治实践的分析。同时,现有的关于基层数据行动主义的学术文献分析了新的统计表征的创造,以挑战官方的统计表征。这些文献在很大程度上忽略了这些数据在长期内会发生什么,也没有将数据归档作为一个积极的项目来对待。这篇理论文章试图弥合档案行动主义文献和数据行动主义文献之间的差距,希望这两套研究能够相互借鉴。活动家档案和数据行动主义之间有明显的相似之处:两者都解决了主流机构未能解释边缘声音的问题,两者都有能力在公共领域使问题变得可见和合法,两者都在尝试传统形式的记忆和统计证据。作者认为,这两种强大的活动形式有很多可以相互学习的地方,特别是在长期管理数据的需求只会增长的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Back-ups for the future: archival practices for data activism
Abstract Literature on activist archiving theorises the power of recordkeeping to give voice to marginalised communities. However, missing from this archival literature are analyses about the political practice of preserving data as an act of grassroots resistance. Simultaneously, existing scholarly literature on grassroots data activism analyses the creation of new statistical representations to challenge official ones. This literature has largely ignored what will happen to this data over the long term, nor has it treated data archiving as an activist project in its own right. This theoretical article seeks to close the gap between literature on archival activism and literature on data activism, in hopes that both sets of research can draw productively from each other. There are clear affinities between activist archives and data activism: both address the failure by mainstream institutions to account for marginal voices, both have the power to make issues visible and legitimate within the public sphere, and both experiment with traditional forms of memory and statistical evidence. The authors believe that these two powerful forms of activity have much to learn from each other, particularly as the need to steward data over the long term will only grow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives and Manuscripts
Archives and Manuscripts INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信