意大利对司法机构的看法

Q2 Social Sciences

International Journal for Court Administration Pub Date : 2019-02-07 DOI:10.18352/IJCA.265

G. Ferrari

{"title":"意大利对司法机构的看法","authors":"G. Ferrari","doi":"10.18352/IJCA.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the problems concerning the independence of the judiciary in Italy. First of all, it analyzes the historical causes that characterize the current Italian situation: the condition of the judges during the fascist dictatorship and the resulting reasons why the founding fathers of the Republic did not trust the judiciary. Then, this paper seeks to explain the different problems that, even today, undermine the independence of judiciary - the practice of judges standing political office, the progressive politicization of the High Council of the Judiciary, the judicial intervention in economic matters and the trend of judges making public statements to matters under judicial scrutiny - and explores the effectiveness of the current guarantees that are given to judges to secure their independence.","PeriodicalId":37676,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Court Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Italian Perspectives on the Judiciary\",\"authors\":\"G. Ferrari\",\"doi\":\"10.18352/IJCA.265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the problems concerning the independence of the judiciary in Italy. First of all, it analyzes the historical causes that characterize the current Italian situation: the condition of the judges during the fascist dictatorship and the resulting reasons why the founding fathers of the Republic did not trust the judiciary. Then, this paper seeks to explain the different problems that, even today, undermine the independence of judiciary - the practice of judges standing political office, the progressive politicization of the High Council of the Judiciary, the judicial intervention in economic matters and the trend of judges making public statements to matters under judicial scrutiny - and explores the effectiveness of the current guarantees that are given to judges to secure their independence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Court Administration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Court Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18352/IJCA.265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Court Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/IJCA.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文论述了意大利司法独立的问题。首先，它分析了意大利当前形势的历史原因:法西斯独裁统治时期法官的状况以及由此产生的共和国开国元勋不信任司法的原因。然后，本文试图解释即使在今天，仍在破坏司法独立的各种问题——法官担任政治职务的做法、司法高级委员会的逐步政治化、司法对经济事务的干预以及法官对司法审查事项发表公开声明的趋势——并探讨目前为确保法官独立性而给予的保障的有效性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Italian Perspectives on the Judiciary

This article deals with the problems concerning the independence of the judiciary in Italy. First of all, it analyzes the historical causes that characterize the current Italian situation: the condition of the judges during the fascist dictatorship and the resulting reasons why the founding fathers of the Republic did not trust the judiciary. Then, this paper seeks to explain the different problems that, even today, undermine the independence of judiciary - the practice of judges standing political office, the progressive politicization of the High Council of the Judiciary, the judicial intervention in economic matters and the trend of judges making public statements to matters under judicial scrutiny - and explores the effectiveness of the current guarantees that are given to judges to secure their independence.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal for Court Administration Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Journal for Court Administration (IJCA) is an on-line journal which focuses on contemporary court administration and management. It provides a platform for the professional exchange of knowledge, experience and research in those areas for a diverse audience of practitioners and academics. Its scope is international, and the editors welcome submissions from court officials, judges, justice ministry officials, academics and others whose professional, research projects, and interests lie in the practical aspects of the effective administration of justice. IJCA is an open access journal, and its articles are subjected to a double blind peer review procedure. Please contact the editors if you are not sure whether your research falls into these categories.