连续放养' Ipyporã '和' Mulato II '腕足草对牧草和动物的反应

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Ana Paula da Silva Carvalho, Leandro F. Domiciano, Isadora G. N. Paraíso, Débora S. M. Silva, Luciano S. Cabral, Lynn E. Sollenberger, Dalton H. Pereira, Bruno C. Pedreira
{"title":"连续放养' Ipyporã '和' Mulato II '腕足草对牧草和动物的反应","authors":"Ana Paula da Silva Carvalho,&nbsp;Leandro F. Domiciano,&nbsp;Isadora G. N. Paraíso,&nbsp;Débora S. M. Silva,&nbsp;Luciano S. Cabral,&nbsp;Lynn E. Sollenberger,&nbsp;Dalton H. Pereira,&nbsp;Bruno C. Pedreira","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>New hybrid grass cultivars may enhance animal performance in forage-livestock systems if they possess traits that address edaphoclimatic challenges and pest susceptibility. The objective was to assess herbage accumulation, plant-part composition, nutritive value, and animal performance of ‘Ipyporã’ [<i>Brachiaria ruziziensis</i> Germ. &amp; Evrard <i>× B. brizantha</i> (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ‘Mulato II’ (<i>B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha × B. decumbens</i> Stapf) hybrids in the Brazilian Amazon biome. From May 2016 to May 2018, pastures were maintained under continuous stocking with variable stocking rates to maintain canopy height at 30-cm. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg dry matter [DM] ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) than Ipyporã pastures (14,930 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) across the years. In Year 1, Mulato II had greater stocking rate (1685 vs. 1215 kg body weight [BW] ha<sup>−1</sup>) and greater gain ha<sup>−1</sup> (1130 vs. 850 kg) than Ipyporã. However, in Year 2, both cultivars had similar plant and animal responses. The Year 1 ADG was similar among cultivars or seasons but in Year 2, rainy seasons had 21 and 77% greater ADG than dry seasons for Mulato II and Ipyporã, respectively. Both cultivars can contribute to the diversification of pasture-based livestock systems in humid tropical regions. Mulato II presented superior performance when soil moisture and fertility were not limiting (i.e., Year 1). However, both cultivars provide similar plant and animal responses in Year 2, offering viable alternatives for the diversification of pasture-based livestock systems in the Amazon Biome.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbage and animal responses on continuously stocked ‘Ipyporã’ and ‘Mulato II’ brachiariagrasses\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula da Silva Carvalho,&nbsp;Leandro F. Domiciano,&nbsp;Isadora G. N. Paraíso,&nbsp;Débora S. M. Silva,&nbsp;Luciano S. Cabral,&nbsp;Lynn E. Sollenberger,&nbsp;Dalton H. Pereira,&nbsp;Bruno C. Pedreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>New hybrid grass cultivars may enhance animal performance in forage-livestock systems if they possess traits that address edaphoclimatic challenges and pest susceptibility. The objective was to assess herbage accumulation, plant-part composition, nutritive value, and animal performance of ‘Ipyporã’ [<i>Brachiaria ruziziensis</i> Germ. &amp; Evrard <i>× B. brizantha</i> (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ‘Mulato II’ (<i>B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha × B. decumbens</i> Stapf) hybrids in the Brazilian Amazon biome. From May 2016 to May 2018, pastures were maintained under continuous stocking with variable stocking rates to maintain canopy height at 30-cm. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg dry matter [DM] ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) than Ipyporã pastures (14,930 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) across the years. In Year 1, Mulato II had greater stocking rate (1685 vs. 1215 kg body weight [BW] ha<sup>−1</sup>) and greater gain ha<sup>−1</sup> (1130 vs. 850 kg) than Ipyporã. However, in Year 2, both cultivars had similar plant and animal responses. The Year 1 ADG was similar among cultivars or seasons but in Year 2, rainy seasons had 21 and 77% greater ADG than dry seasons for Mulato II and Ipyporã, respectively. Both cultivars can contribute to the diversification of pasture-based livestock systems in humid tropical regions. Mulato II presented superior performance when soil moisture and fertility were not limiting (i.e., Year 1). However, both cultivars provide similar plant and animal responses in Year 2, offering viable alternatives for the diversification of pasture-based livestock systems in the Amazon Biome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12595\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果新的杂交草品种具有应对气候挑战和害虫易感性的性状,则可能提高饲草-牲畜系统中的动物生产性能。目的是评估' Ipyporã ' [Brachiaria ruziziensis芽]的牧草积累,植物部分组成,营养价值和动物生产性能。,埃弗拉× B。brizantha (Hochst。A.里奇。Stapf]和' Mulato II ' (B. ruziziensis × B.;B。巴西亚马逊生物群系中的小豆(decumbens Stapf)杂交种。2016年5月至2018年5月,在不同放养率的连续放养条件下,维持牧场的冠层高度在30 cm。Mulato II牧草累积量(17370 kg干物质[DM] HA−1年−1)大于Ipyporã牧场(14930 kg DM HA−1年−1)。在第1年,Mulato II的放养率(1685比1215 kg体重)和增重(1130比850 kg)均高于Ipyporã。然而,在第二年,两个品种的植物和动物反应相似。Mulato II和Ipyporã品种间和季节间1年的平均日增重相似,但2年的平均日增重比旱季分别高出21%和77%。这两个品种都有助于湿润热带地区以放牧为基础的牲畜系统的多样化。当土壤湿度和肥力不受限制时(即第1年),Mulato II表现出优异的表现。然而,这两个品种在第2年提供了相似的植物和动物响应,为亚马逊生物群系放牧牲畜系统的多样化提供了可行的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Herbage and animal responses on continuously stocked ‘Ipyporã’ and ‘Mulato II’ brachiariagrasses

New hybrid grass cultivars may enhance animal performance in forage-livestock systems if they possess traits that address edaphoclimatic challenges and pest susceptibility. The objective was to assess herbage accumulation, plant-part composition, nutritive value, and animal performance of ‘Ipyporã’ [Brachiaria ruziziensis Germ. & Evrard × B. brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ‘Mulato II’ (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha × B. decumbens Stapf) hybrids in the Brazilian Amazon biome. From May 2016 to May 2018, pastures were maintained under continuous stocking with variable stocking rates to maintain canopy height at 30-cm. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg dry matter [DM] ha−1 year−1) than Ipyporã pastures (14,930 kg DM ha−1 year−1) across the years. In Year 1, Mulato II had greater stocking rate (1685 vs. 1215 kg body weight [BW] ha−1) and greater gain ha−1 (1130 vs. 850 kg) than Ipyporã. However, in Year 2, both cultivars had similar plant and animal responses. The Year 1 ADG was similar among cultivars or seasons but in Year 2, rainy seasons had 21 and 77% greater ADG than dry seasons for Mulato II and Ipyporã, respectively. Both cultivars can contribute to the diversification of pasture-based livestock systems in humid tropical regions. Mulato II presented superior performance when soil moisture and fertility were not limiting (i.e., Year 1). However, both cultivars provide similar plant and animal responses in Year 2, offering viable alternatives for the diversification of pasture-based livestock systems in the Amazon Biome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信