模拟大型赛事的经济影响:以2018年黄金海岸英联邦运动会为例

IF 0.7 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Tien Pham, S. Becken, Michael Powell
{"title":"模拟大型赛事的经济影响:以2018年黄金海岸英联邦运动会为例","authors":"Tien Pham, S. Becken, Michael Powell","doi":"10.1017/qre.2019.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article consolidates the pros and cons of the two common modelling techniques for economic impact analysis: the input–output multiplier and the computable general equilibrium (CGE) technique. The latter is recommended for large event assessment and was used to examine the economic impacts of the Gold Coast 2018 Commonwealth Games. The Games is estimated to have generated approximately A$2.5 billion of gross state product (GSP) to Queensland after netting out the costs incurred. The effect is spread over a period of nine years from pre-Games period of preparation for the Games, through the Games period itself, and then rather significantly in the post-Games period. While benefits accrue to Queensland, the rest of Australia is estimated to lose due to the so-called ‘crowding out effect’.","PeriodicalId":41491,"journal":{"name":"Queensland Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"110 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/qre.2019.13","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the economic impacts of a large event: The case of the Gold Coast 2018 Commonwealth Games\",\"authors\":\"Tien Pham, S. Becken, Michael Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/qre.2019.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article consolidates the pros and cons of the two common modelling techniques for economic impact analysis: the input–output multiplier and the computable general equilibrium (CGE) technique. The latter is recommended for large event assessment and was used to examine the economic impacts of the Gold Coast 2018 Commonwealth Games. The Games is estimated to have generated approximately A$2.5 billion of gross state product (GSP) to Queensland after netting out the costs incurred. The effect is spread over a period of nine years from pre-Games period of preparation for the Games, through the Games period itself, and then rather significantly in the post-Games period. While benefits accrue to Queensland, the rest of Australia is estimated to lose due to the so-called ‘crowding out effect’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Queensland Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"110 - 127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/qre.2019.13\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Queensland Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/qre.2019.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queensland Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/qre.2019.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文综合分析了两种常用的经济影响分析建模技术的优缺点:投入产出乘数法和可计算一般均衡法。后者被推荐用于大型活动评估,并用于检查黄金海岸2018年英联邦运动会的经济影响。据估计,在扣除相关费用后,本届奥运会为昆士兰州创造了约25亿澳元的国民生产总值(GSP)。这种影响在9年的时间里蔓延开来,从奥运会前的奥运会准备阶段,到奥运会期间,然后在奥运会后的时期尤为显著。虽然昆士兰州从中受益,但由于所谓的“挤出效应”,澳大利亚其他地区估计会蒙受损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling the economic impacts of a large event: The case of the Gold Coast 2018 Commonwealth Games
Abstract This article consolidates the pros and cons of the two common modelling techniques for economic impact analysis: the input–output multiplier and the computable general equilibrium (CGE) technique. The latter is recommended for large event assessment and was used to examine the economic impacts of the Gold Coast 2018 Commonwealth Games. The Games is estimated to have generated approximately A$2.5 billion of gross state product (GSP) to Queensland after netting out the costs incurred. The effect is spread over a period of nine years from pre-Games period of preparation for the Games, through the Games period itself, and then rather significantly in the post-Games period. While benefits accrue to Queensland, the rest of Australia is estimated to lose due to the so-called ‘crowding out effect’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Queensland Review
Queensland Review AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published in association with Griffith University Queensland Review is a multi-disciplinary journal of Australian Studies which focuses on the history, literature, culture, society, politics and environment of the state of Queensland. Queensland’s relations with Asia, the Pacific islands and Papua New Guinea are a particular focus of the journal, as are comparative studies with other regions. In addition to scholarly articles, Queensland Review publishes commentaries, interviews, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信