利用综合生态系统评估建立有弹性的生态系统、社区和经济

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
E. Spooner, M. Karnauskas, C. Harvey, C. Kelble, Judith Rosellón-Druker, S. Kasperski, S. Lucey, Kelly S. Andrews, S. Gittings, J. Moss, J. Gove, J. Samhouri, R. Allee, S. Bograd, M. Monaco, Patricia M Clay, L. Rogers, A. Marshak, S. Wongbusarakum, Kathy Broughton, P. Lynch
{"title":"利用综合生态系统评估建立有弹性的生态系统、社区和经济","authors":"E. Spooner, M. Karnauskas, C. Harvey, C. Kelble, Judith Rosellón-Druker, S. Kasperski, S. Lucey, Kelly S. Andrews, S. Gittings, J. Moss, J. Gove, J. Samhouri, R. Allee, S. Bograd, M. Monaco, Patricia M Clay, L. Rogers, A. Marshak, S. Wongbusarakum, Kathy Broughton, P. Lynch","doi":"10.1080/08920753.2021.1846152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Science-based natural resource management is necessary for agencies to effectively meet their goals and mandates. However, this scientific basis needs to be advanced and evolved with ecosystems experiencing unprecedented events that challenge conventional management frameworks. Effectively managing marine resources and achieving agency missions requires more than meeting independent mandates and managing individual resources as chronic stressors overwhelm conventional management frameworks. Global science organizations are transitioning to interdisciplinary and holistic research to integrate human well-being as a key outcome. The United States’ principal federal agency tasked with managing coastal and marine ecosystems is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). NOAA’s vision is “healthy ecosystems, communities and economies that are resilient in the face of change”. NOAA adopted the Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) approach to conduct the collaborative science necessary for ecosystem-based management. IEAs have been employed for over a decade to develop science, tools, and collaborations that address complex ecosystem challenges and make progress toward NOAA’s vision. This paper demonstrates, through case studies, how scientists, stakeholders, and managers build trust and meaningful relationships from the IEA approach. These case studies further demonstrate how the IEA approach can be adapted to various geographic and management scales to build trust with partners and provide the ecosystem science, including social science, required to build resilient coastal ecosystems, communities, and economies.","PeriodicalId":50995,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Management","volume":"49 1","pages":"26 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846152","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Integrated Ecosystem Assessments to Build Resilient Ecosystems, Communities, and Economies\",\"authors\":\"E. Spooner, M. Karnauskas, C. Harvey, C. Kelble, Judith Rosellón-Druker, S. Kasperski, S. Lucey, Kelly S. Andrews, S. Gittings, J. Moss, J. Gove, J. Samhouri, R. Allee, S. Bograd, M. Monaco, Patricia M Clay, L. Rogers, A. Marshak, S. Wongbusarakum, Kathy Broughton, P. Lynch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08920753.2021.1846152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Science-based natural resource management is necessary for agencies to effectively meet their goals and mandates. However, this scientific basis needs to be advanced and evolved with ecosystems experiencing unprecedented events that challenge conventional management frameworks. Effectively managing marine resources and achieving agency missions requires more than meeting independent mandates and managing individual resources as chronic stressors overwhelm conventional management frameworks. Global science organizations are transitioning to interdisciplinary and holistic research to integrate human well-being as a key outcome. The United States’ principal federal agency tasked with managing coastal and marine ecosystems is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). NOAA’s vision is “healthy ecosystems, communities and economies that are resilient in the face of change”. NOAA adopted the Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) approach to conduct the collaborative science necessary for ecosystem-based management. IEAs have been employed for over a decade to develop science, tools, and collaborations that address complex ecosystem challenges and make progress toward NOAA’s vision. This paper demonstrates, through case studies, how scientists, stakeholders, and managers build trust and meaningful relationships from the IEA approach. These case studies further demonstrate how the IEA approach can be adapted to various geographic and management scales to build trust with partners and provide the ecosystem science, including social science, required to build resilient coastal ecosystems, communities, and economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846152\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846152\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

摘要基于科学的自然资源管理是各机构有效实现其目标和任务所必需的。然而,随着生态系统经历前所未有的挑战传统管理框架的事件,这一科学基础需要进一步发展。有效管理海洋资源和实现机构使命需要的不仅仅是履行独立的任务和管理个人资源,因为长期的压力源压倒了传统的管理框架。全球科学组织正在向跨学科和整体研究过渡,以将人类福祉作为一项关键成果。美国负责管理沿海和海洋生态系统的主要联邦机构是美国国家海洋和大气管理局(NOAA)。美国国家海洋和大气管理局的愿景是“健康的生态系统、社区和经济在面对变化时具有韧性”。NOAA采用了综合生态系统评估方法,开展基于生态系统的管理所需的合作科学。十多年来,IEA一直致力于开发科学、工具和合作,以应对复杂的生态系统挑战,并朝着NOAA的愿景取得进展。本文通过案例研究展示了科学家、利益相关者和管理者如何通过国际能源署的方法建立信任和有意义的关系。这些案例研究进一步证明了国际能源署的方法如何适应各种地理和管理规模,以与合作伙伴建立信任,并提供建设有韧性的沿海生态系统、社区和经济所需的生态系统科学,包括社会科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Integrated Ecosystem Assessments to Build Resilient Ecosystems, Communities, and Economies
Abstract Science-based natural resource management is necessary for agencies to effectively meet their goals and mandates. However, this scientific basis needs to be advanced and evolved with ecosystems experiencing unprecedented events that challenge conventional management frameworks. Effectively managing marine resources and achieving agency missions requires more than meeting independent mandates and managing individual resources as chronic stressors overwhelm conventional management frameworks. Global science organizations are transitioning to interdisciplinary and holistic research to integrate human well-being as a key outcome. The United States’ principal federal agency tasked with managing coastal and marine ecosystems is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). NOAA’s vision is “healthy ecosystems, communities and economies that are resilient in the face of change”. NOAA adopted the Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) approach to conduct the collaborative science necessary for ecosystem-based management. IEAs have been employed for over a decade to develop science, tools, and collaborations that address complex ecosystem challenges and make progress toward NOAA’s vision. This paper demonstrates, through case studies, how scientists, stakeholders, and managers build trust and meaningful relationships from the IEA approach. These case studies further demonstrate how the IEA approach can be adapted to various geographic and management scales to build trust with partners and provide the ecosystem science, including social science, required to build resilient coastal ecosystems, communities, and economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Management
Coastal Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coastal Management is an international peer-reviewed, applied research journal dedicated to exploring the technical, applied ecological, legal, political, social, and policy issues relating to the use of coastal and ocean resources and environments on a global scale. The journal presents timely information on management tools and techniques as well as recent findings from research and analysis that bear directly on management and policy. Findings must be grounded in the current peer reviewed literature and relevant studies. Articles must contain a clear and relevant management component. Preference is given to studies of interest to an international readership, but case studies are accepted if conclusions are derived from acceptable evaluative methods, reference to comparable cases, and related to peer reviewed studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信