他在NOW跨栏赛和春季赛中的表现

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Pravni Vjesnik Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.25234/pv/24905
Tamara Đurđić Milošević, Aleksandra Pavićević
{"title":"他在NOW跨栏赛和春季赛中的表现","authors":"Tamara Đurđić Milošević, Aleksandra Pavićević","doi":"10.25234/pv/24905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fiduciary transfer of property is a controversial institute of real law, dating back to Roman law, which has been revived and reshaped by modern practice. The institute, as a kind of conditional, content-limited property, has had its significant place in the Law on Property and Other Real Rights in Croatia for 25 years, as an atypical real guarantee that is functionally most similar to the right of lien. The subject of the paper is a comparative and axiological anal- ysis of this institute in positive Croatian law and its status in Serbian law, whose positive regu- lations do not regulate this institute, but whose introduction is proposed by one of the two le- gal drafts. Considering the situation in Serbian judicial practice, which has been vacillating for a long time regarding the issue of the permissibility of this institute, and in doctrine - which generally recognizes it, the author’s position is that this institute should be standardized in Serbian law de lege ferenda, for legal certainty, whereby the Croatian regulation represents a potential model. Hence, it is important to critically assess certain segments of this solution, starting with the question of origin, expediency, content, effect and legal nature. The final goal of the paper is to evaluate the adequacy of the compared solutions, as well as formulate proposals for regulating fiduciary property de lege ferenda, as part of the planned reform of the Serbian civil law, as well as of the harmonization of national solutions at regional level.","PeriodicalId":41100,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Vjesnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FIDUCIJARNI PRENOS SVOJINE U SAVREMENOM HRVATSKOM I SRPSKOM PRAVU\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Đurđić Milošević, Aleksandra Pavićević\",\"doi\":\"10.25234/pv/24905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fiduciary transfer of property is a controversial institute of real law, dating back to Roman law, which has been revived and reshaped by modern practice. The institute, as a kind of conditional, content-limited property, has had its significant place in the Law on Property and Other Real Rights in Croatia for 25 years, as an atypical real guarantee that is functionally most similar to the right of lien. The subject of the paper is a comparative and axiological anal- ysis of this institute in positive Croatian law and its status in Serbian law, whose positive regu- lations do not regulate this institute, but whose introduction is proposed by one of the two le- gal drafts. Considering the situation in Serbian judicial practice, which has been vacillating for a long time regarding the issue of the permissibility of this institute, and in doctrine - which generally recognizes it, the author’s position is that this institute should be standardized in Serbian law de lege ferenda, for legal certainty, whereby the Croatian regulation represents a potential model. Hence, it is important to critically assess certain segments of this solution, starting with the question of origin, expediency, content, effect and legal nature. The final goal of the paper is to evaluate the adequacy of the compared solutions, as well as formulate proposals for regulating fiduciary property de lege ferenda, as part of the planned reform of the Serbian civil law, as well as of the harmonization of national solutions at regional level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravni Vjesnik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravni Vjesnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/24905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/24905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财产信托转让是一个有争议的物权法研究机构,可以追溯到罗马法,现代实践使其复兴和重塑。该机构作为一种有条件的、内容有限的财产,25年来在克罗地亚《财产和其他不动产法》中占有重要地位,是一种非典型的不动产担保,在功能上与留置权最为相似。本文的主题是对该机构在克罗地亚实证法中的地位及其在塞尔维亚法律中的地位进行比较和价值分析,塞尔维亚法律的实证条例并不规范该机构,但其介绍是由两份法律草案中的一份提出的。考虑到塞尔维亚司法实践中长期以来在该机构的许可问题上摇摆不定的情况,以及在普遍承认该机构的学说中的情况,提交人的立场是,为了法律的确定性,该机构应在塞尔维亚拟议法中得到标准化,克罗地亚法规代表了一种潜在的模式。因此,重要的是要严格评估这一解决方案的某些部分,从起源、权宜之计、内容、效果和法律性质问题开始。该文件的最终目标是评估比较解决方案的充分性,并制定根据拟议法规范信托财产的建议,作为计划中的塞尔维亚民法改革的一部分,以及在区域一级协调国家解决方案的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FIDUCIJARNI PRENOS SVOJINE U SAVREMENOM HRVATSKOM I SRPSKOM PRAVU
The fiduciary transfer of property is a controversial institute of real law, dating back to Roman law, which has been revived and reshaped by modern practice. The institute, as a kind of conditional, content-limited property, has had its significant place in the Law on Property and Other Real Rights in Croatia for 25 years, as an atypical real guarantee that is functionally most similar to the right of lien. The subject of the paper is a comparative and axiological anal- ysis of this institute in positive Croatian law and its status in Serbian law, whose positive regu- lations do not regulate this institute, but whose introduction is proposed by one of the two le- gal drafts. Considering the situation in Serbian judicial practice, which has been vacillating for a long time regarding the issue of the permissibility of this institute, and in doctrine - which generally recognizes it, the author’s position is that this institute should be standardized in Serbian law de lege ferenda, for legal certainty, whereby the Croatian regulation represents a potential model. Hence, it is important to critically assess certain segments of this solution, starting with the question of origin, expediency, content, effect and legal nature. The final goal of the paper is to evaluate the adequacy of the compared solutions, as well as formulate proposals for regulating fiduciary property de lege ferenda, as part of the planned reform of the Serbian civil law, as well as of the harmonization of national solutions at regional level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信