土壤遗留效应在入侵豆科植物胡枝子管理中的作用研究

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Matthew S. Hodges, C. Goodwillie
{"title":"土壤遗留效应在入侵豆科植物胡枝子管理中的作用研究","authors":"Matthew S. Hodges, C. Goodwillie","doi":"10.3375/0885-8608-43.2.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Invasive plant species present a growing threat to biodiversity. Many invasive plants recruit microbial symbionts in their novel range that influence their growth and fitness. These soil legacy effects can linger after the removal of invasive species and impact restoration efforts. In a growth room experiment to investigate the legacy effects of an invasive legume and herbicide, Lespedeza cuneata was grown with either an intraspecific competitor or a native species in field-collected soils with and without history of an L. cuneata invasion and use of glyphosate herbicide. In separate experiments, we investigated seed germination and seed bank composition in these different soil types. Taken together, results suggest that legacy effects of L. cuneata invasion do not significantly contribute to its growth or spread in a floodplain in eastern North Carolina. The absence of soil legacy effects, which have been documented in other systems, may be attributed to frequent flooding observed in the system and the resulting homogenization of soil biota. Study findings also suggest that the application of glyphosate herbicide creates areas where L. cuneata can readily reinvade, as it significantly reduced the number and diversity of seedlings to emerge from the seed bank while increasing the aboveground biomass and nodule formation of L. cuneata. Concerning the restoration of native flora, data suggest that Chasmanthium latifolium may be negatively impacted by a L. cuneata invasion or glyphosate herbicide, while Solidago altissima and Chamaecrista nictitans could be successful in preventing areas from being reinvaded.","PeriodicalId":49780,"journal":{"name":"Natural Areas Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"124 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Role of Soil Legacy Effects in the Management of Lespedeza cuneata, an Invasive Legume\",\"authors\":\"Matthew S. Hodges, C. Goodwillie\",\"doi\":\"10.3375/0885-8608-43.2.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Invasive plant species present a growing threat to biodiversity. Many invasive plants recruit microbial symbionts in their novel range that influence their growth and fitness. These soil legacy effects can linger after the removal of invasive species and impact restoration efforts. In a growth room experiment to investigate the legacy effects of an invasive legume and herbicide, Lespedeza cuneata was grown with either an intraspecific competitor or a native species in field-collected soils with and without history of an L. cuneata invasion and use of glyphosate herbicide. In separate experiments, we investigated seed germination and seed bank composition in these different soil types. Taken together, results suggest that legacy effects of L. cuneata invasion do not significantly contribute to its growth or spread in a floodplain in eastern North Carolina. The absence of soil legacy effects, which have been documented in other systems, may be attributed to frequent flooding observed in the system and the resulting homogenization of soil biota. Study findings also suggest that the application of glyphosate herbicide creates areas where L. cuneata can readily reinvade, as it significantly reduced the number and diversity of seedlings to emerge from the seed bank while increasing the aboveground biomass and nodule formation of L. cuneata. Concerning the restoration of native flora, data suggest that Chasmanthium latifolium may be negatively impacted by a L. cuneata invasion or glyphosate herbicide, while Solidago altissima and Chamaecrista nictitans could be successful in preventing areas from being reinvaded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"124 - 134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.2.124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Areas Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.2.124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入侵植物对生物多样性的威胁日益严重。许多入侵植物在其新范围内招募微生物共生体,影响其生长和适应性。这些土壤遗产效应会在入侵物种消失后继续存在,并影响恢复工作。在一项研究入侵豆科植物和除草剂遗留效应的生长室内实验中,研究人员在有和没有入侵和使用草甘膦除草剂历史的土壤中,与种内竞争对手或本地物种一起种植胡枝子。在不同的试验中,我们研究了不同土壤类型的种子萌发和种子库组成。综上所述,研究结果表明,在北卡罗莱纳东部的漫滩上,L. cuneata入侵的遗留效应并没有显著地促进其生长或传播。在其他系统中已经有记录的土壤遗留效应的缺失可能归因于该系统中观察到的频繁洪水以及由此导致的土壤生物群均一化。研究结果还表明,草甘膦除草剂的使用大大减少了草甘膦种子库中出现的幼苗数量和多样性,同时增加了草甘膦地上生物量和根瘤形成,从而创造了草甘膦容易再次入侵的区域。在原生植物区系恢复方面,有数据表明,柽柳(Chasmanthium latifolium)可能会受到L. cuneata入侵或草甘膦除草剂的负面影响,而一枝Solidago altissima和Chamaecrista nictitans可能会成功阻止该地区的再次入侵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Role of Soil Legacy Effects in the Management of Lespedeza cuneata, an Invasive Legume
ABSTRACT Invasive plant species present a growing threat to biodiversity. Many invasive plants recruit microbial symbionts in their novel range that influence their growth and fitness. These soil legacy effects can linger after the removal of invasive species and impact restoration efforts. In a growth room experiment to investigate the legacy effects of an invasive legume and herbicide, Lespedeza cuneata was grown with either an intraspecific competitor or a native species in field-collected soils with and without history of an L. cuneata invasion and use of glyphosate herbicide. In separate experiments, we investigated seed germination and seed bank composition in these different soil types. Taken together, results suggest that legacy effects of L. cuneata invasion do not significantly contribute to its growth or spread in a floodplain in eastern North Carolina. The absence of soil legacy effects, which have been documented in other systems, may be attributed to frequent flooding observed in the system and the resulting homogenization of soil biota. Study findings also suggest that the application of glyphosate herbicide creates areas where L. cuneata can readily reinvade, as it significantly reduced the number and diversity of seedlings to emerge from the seed bank while increasing the aboveground biomass and nodule formation of L. cuneata. Concerning the restoration of native flora, data suggest that Chasmanthium latifolium may be negatively impacted by a L. cuneata invasion or glyphosate herbicide, while Solidago altissima and Chamaecrista nictitans could be successful in preventing areas from being reinvaded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Areas Journal
Natural Areas Journal 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Natural Areas Journal is the flagship publication of the Natural Areas Association is the leading voice in natural areas management and preservation. The Journal features peer-reviewed original research articles on topics such as: -Applied conservation biology- Ecological restoration- Natural areas management- Ecological assessment and monitoring- Invasive and exotic species management- Habitat protection- Fire ecology. It also includes writing on conservation issues, forums, topic reviews, editorials, state and federal natural area activities and book reviews. In addition, we publish special issues on various topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信