将时间概念化为分析层次:信任动力学分析的新方向

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT

Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI:10.1080/21515581.2018.1516557

M. Audrey Korsgaard, Jason Kautz, P. Bliese, Katarzyna Samson, Patrycjusz Kostyszyn

{"title":"将时间概念化为分析层次:信任动力学分析的新方向","authors":"M. Audrey Korsgaard, Jason Kautz, P. Bliese, Katarzyna Samson, Patrycjusz Kostyszyn","doi":"10.1080/21515581.2018.1516557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Theory on trust development, dissolution, and restoration suggest that trust is a dynamic state that varies in predictable and often systematic ways. Empirical research, however, lags behind the theoretical development, particularly with respect to understanding the trajectory of trust. This article reviews theory on dynamics of trust and some of the limitations in empirical research on these theories. We then describe an established but underutilised longitudinal analytic method that promises to foster significant theoretical refinements. We provide an illustrative example and discuss implications for future research.","PeriodicalId":44602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trust Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21515581.2018.1516557","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualising time as a level of analysis: New directions in the analysis of trust dynamics\",\"authors\":\"M. Audrey Korsgaard, Jason Kautz, P. Bliese, Katarzyna Samson, Patrycjusz Kostyszyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21515581.2018.1516557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Theory on trust development, dissolution, and restoration suggest that trust is a dynamic state that varies in predictable and often systematic ways. Empirical research, however, lags behind the theoretical development, particularly with respect to understanding the trajectory of trust. This article reviews theory on dynamics of trust and some of the limitations in empirical research on these theories. We then describe an established but underutilised longitudinal analytic method that promises to foster significant theoretical refinements. We provide an illustrative example and discuss implications for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trust Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21515581.2018.1516557\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trust Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1516557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1516557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 38

摘要

关于信任发展、解散和恢复的理论表明，信任是一种动态状态，以可预测的方式变化，通常是系统的。然而，实证研究滞后于理论发展，尤其是在理解信任轨迹方面。本文回顾了信任动力学的理论，以及这些理论在实证研究中的一些局限性。然后，我们描述了一种已建立但未充分利用的纵向分析方法，该方法有望促进重大的理论改进。我们提供了一个说明性的例子，并讨论了对未来研究的启示。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Conceptualising time as a level of analysis: New directions in the analysis of trust dynamics

ABSTRACT Theory on trust development, dissolution, and restoration suggest that trust is a dynamic state that varies in predictable and often systematic ways. Empirical research, however, lags behind the theoretical development, particularly with respect to understanding the trajectory of trust. This article reviews theory on dynamics of trust and some of the limitations in empirical research on these theories. We then describe an established but underutilised longitudinal analytic method that promises to foster significant theoretical refinements. We provide an illustrative example and discuss implications for future research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Trust Research Multiple-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

42.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： As an inter-disciplinary and cross-cultural journal dedicated to advancing a cross-level, context-rich, process-oriented, and practice-relevant journal, JTR provides a focal point for an open dialogue and debate between diverse researchers, thus enhancing the understanding of trust in general and trust-related management in particular, especially in its organizational and social context in the broadest sense. Through both theoretical development and empirical investigation, JTR seeks to open the "black-box" of trust in various contexts.