到1800年的文学

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Scott Slawinski
{"title":"到1800年的文学","authors":"Scott Slawinski","doi":"10.1215/00659142-8225382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The wide swath of approaches to early American studies in 2015 testifies to the vitality of the field, and organizing the materials for this chapter proved challenging. A common denominator for much of this year’s criticism, however, is review and revision—fresh readings, fresh connections, and fresh observations abound. Genre, political engagement, national figures, conservationism, identity, boundaries, literary tradition, and rhetoric, among others, all assume prominence in one or more studies and appear in new light. Despite this significant engagement with revision, there is also a sense of the familiar: many of the figures and works under scrutiny are well known and often read. Studies of lesser-known figures and lesser-read works in all genres clearly stepped into the background this year, and a renewal of rediscovery of unread texts and authors is needed.","PeriodicalId":40078,"journal":{"name":"American Literary Scholarship","volume":"2015 1","pages":"179 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature to 1800\",\"authors\":\"Scott Slawinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00659142-8225382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The wide swath of approaches to early American studies in 2015 testifies to the vitality of the field, and organizing the materials for this chapter proved challenging. A common denominator for much of this year’s criticism, however, is review and revision—fresh readings, fresh connections, and fresh observations abound. Genre, political engagement, national figures, conservationism, identity, boundaries, literary tradition, and rhetoric, among others, all assume prominence in one or more studies and appear in new light. Despite this significant engagement with revision, there is also a sense of the familiar: many of the figures and works under scrutiny are well known and often read. Studies of lesser-known figures and lesser-read works in all genres clearly stepped into the background this year, and a renewal of rediscovery of unread texts and authors is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Literary Scholarship\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Literary Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00659142-8225382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Literary Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00659142-8225382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年早期美国研究的广泛方法证明了该领域的活力,而本章的材料组织证明了这一挑战。然而,今年许多批评的共同点是回顾和修改——新鲜的阅读、新鲜的联系和新鲜的观察比比皆是。流派、政治参与、民族人物、保守主义、身份、边界、文学传统和修辞,等等,都在一个或多个研究中占据突出地位,并以新的视角出现。尽管有大量的修订,但也有一种熟悉的感觉:许多被审查的人物和作品都是众所周知的,经常被阅读。今年,对所有体裁中不太知名的人物和较少阅读的作品的研究显然成为了背景,需要重新发现未读的文本和作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Literature to 1800
The wide swath of approaches to early American studies in 2015 testifies to the vitality of the field, and organizing the materials for this chapter proved challenging. A common denominator for much of this year’s criticism, however, is review and revision—fresh readings, fresh connections, and fresh observations abound. Genre, political engagement, national figures, conservationism, identity, boundaries, literary tradition, and rhetoric, among others, all assume prominence in one or more studies and appear in new light. Despite this significant engagement with revision, there is also a sense of the familiar: many of the figures and works under scrutiny are well known and often read. Studies of lesser-known figures and lesser-read works in all genres clearly stepped into the background this year, and a renewal of rediscovery of unread texts and authors is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Literary Scholarship
American Literary Scholarship LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: American Literary Scholarship features bibliographic essays arranged by writer and time period, from pre-1800 to the present, and acts as a “systematic evaluative guide to current published studies of American literature” (ALA Booklist). Each volume of American Literary Scholarship covers content from two years previous to the volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信