杰克·戈尔森、罗杰·格林与新西兰考古学的争论

IF 0.2 4区哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Historical Records of Australian Science Pub Date : 2020-06-19 DOI:10.1071/hr20002

H. Allen

{"title":"杰克·戈尔森、罗杰·格林与新西兰考古学的争论","authors":"H. Allen","doi":"10.1071/hr20002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussion in settler New Zealand concerning the Maori past has gone on for more than 150 years. To a large extent, archaeological approaches to this issue date only to the arrival of Jack Golson, a Cambridge-trained archaeologist, at the University of Auckland in 1954. He was joined shortly afterwards by Roger Green from Harvard. Debates between Golson and Green, bringing both European and American approaches to bear within a culture historical framework, have been influential. Their work and subsequent critiques are reviewed, along with an assessment of how New Zealand archaeologists currently interpret the archaeological record of change and development within Maori culture.","PeriodicalId":51246,"journal":{"name":"Historical Records of Australian Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"127-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jack Golson, Roger Green and debates in New Zealand archaeology\",\"authors\":\"H. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/hr20002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussion in settler New Zealand concerning the Maori past has gone on for more than 150 years. To a large extent, archaeological approaches to this issue date only to the arrival of Jack Golson, a Cambridge-trained archaeologist, at the University of Auckland in 1954. He was joined shortly afterwards by Roger Green from Harvard. Debates between Golson and Green, bringing both European and American approaches to bear within a culture historical framework, have been influential. Their work and subsequent critiques are reviewed, along with an assessment of how New Zealand archaeologists currently interpret the archaeological record of change and development within Maori culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Records of Australian Science\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"127-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Records of Australian Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/hr20002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Records of Australian Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/hr20002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

新西兰定居者对毛利人过去的讨论已经进行了150多年。在很大程度上，对这个问题的考古方法只能追溯到1954年剑桥大学培养的考古学家杰克·戈尔森来到奥克兰大学。不久之后，哈佛大学的罗杰·格林也加入了他的行列。戈尔森和格林之间的辩论，将欧洲和美国的方法纳入文化历史框架，一直具有影响力。对他们的工作和随后的批评进行了回顾，并对新西兰考古学家目前如何解读毛利文化中变化和发展的考古记录进行了评估。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Jack Golson, Roger Green and debates in New Zealand archaeology

Discussion in settler New Zealand concerning the Maori past has gone on for more than 150 years. To a large extent, archaeological approaches to this issue date only to the arrival of Jack Golson, a Cambridge-trained archaeologist, at the University of Auckland in 1954. He was joined shortly afterwards by Roger Green from Harvard. Debates between Golson and Green, bringing both European and American approaches to bear within a culture historical framework, have been influential. Their work and subsequent critiques are reviewed, along with an assessment of how New Zealand archaeologists currently interpret the archaeological record of change and development within Maori culture.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Historical Records of Australian Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

66.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Historical Records of Australian Science is a bi-annual journal that publishes two kinds of unsolicited manuscripts relating to the history of science, pure and applied, in Australia, New Zealand and the southwest Pacific. Historical Articles–original scholarly pieces of peer-reviewed research Historical Documents–either hitherto unpublished or obscurely published primary sources, along with a peer-reviewed scholarly introduction. The first issue of the journal (under the title Records of the Australian Academy of Science), appeared in 1966, and the current name was adopted in 1980.