在管理实践中比较最佳氮肥率的标准化统计方法:自举方法

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hannah R. Francis, Ting Fung Ma, Matthew D. Ruark
{"title":"在管理实践中比较最佳氮肥率的标准化统计方法:自举方法","authors":"Hannah R. Francis,&nbsp;Ting Fung Ma,&nbsp;Matthew D. Ruark","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are a range of approaches to compare differences between or among optimum nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates resulting from different management practices; however, this goal lacks statistical standardization. To provide the statistical rigor needed to give clear recommendations for greater or less N need based on specific management practices, we propose a bootstrapping approach that resamples residuals with replacement. While bootstrapping is not new to data processing in agronomic fields, we provide an example of how to conduct residual-resampled bootstrapping with nonlinear regression to identify differences in response curves, optimum N rates, and maximum yields using the FertBoot package in R. Our example dataset provides clear evidence of the value of the bootstrapping approach, as it can aid in determining significant differences between even relatively small differences in optimum N rate. We encourage adoption of this approach as a way to accurately evaluate differences in optimum fertilizer levels between or among treatments to better inform future agronomic decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ael2.20045","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a standardized statistical methodology comparing optimum nitrogen rates among management practices: A bootstrapping approach\",\"authors\":\"Hannah R. Francis,&nbsp;Ting Fung Ma,&nbsp;Matthew D. Ruark\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ael2.20045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There are a range of approaches to compare differences between or among optimum nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates resulting from different management practices; however, this goal lacks statistical standardization. To provide the statistical rigor needed to give clear recommendations for greater or less N need based on specific management practices, we propose a bootstrapping approach that resamples residuals with replacement. While bootstrapping is not new to data processing in agronomic fields, we provide an example of how to conduct residual-resampled bootstrapping with nonlinear regression to identify differences in response curves, optimum N rates, and maximum yields using the FertBoot package in R. Our example dataset provides clear evidence of the value of the bootstrapping approach, as it can aid in determining significant differences between even relatively small differences in optimum N rate. We encourage adoption of this approach as a way to accurately evaluate differences in optimum fertilizer levels between or among treatments to better inform future agronomic decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ael2.20045\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有一系列方法可以比较不同管理做法造成的最佳氮肥施用量之间或之间的差异;然而,这一目标缺乏统计标准化。为了提供必要的统计严密性,根据具体的管理实践给出更多或更少N需求的明确建议,我们提出了一种自举方法,对残差进行替换重新采样。虽然自举在农艺领域的数据处理中并不新鲜,但我们提供了一个例子,说明如何使用r中的FertBoot包进行残差重采样自举,以识别响应曲线、最佳N率和最大产量的差异。我们的示例数据集提供了自举方法价值的明确证据,因为它可以帮助确定即使相对较小的最佳N率差异之间的显著差异。我们鼓励采用这种方法,以准确评估处理之间或处理之间最佳肥料水平的差异,以便更好地为未来的农艺决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Toward a standardized statistical methodology comparing optimum nitrogen rates among management practices: A bootstrapping approach

Toward a standardized statistical methodology comparing optimum nitrogen rates among management practices: A bootstrapping approach

There are a range of approaches to compare differences between or among optimum nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates resulting from different management practices; however, this goal lacks statistical standardization. To provide the statistical rigor needed to give clear recommendations for greater or less N need based on specific management practices, we propose a bootstrapping approach that resamples residuals with replacement. While bootstrapping is not new to data processing in agronomic fields, we provide an example of how to conduct residual-resampled bootstrapping with nonlinear regression to identify differences in response curves, optimum N rates, and maximum yields using the FertBoot package in R. Our example dataset provides clear evidence of the value of the bootstrapping approach, as it can aid in determining significant differences between even relatively small differences in optimum N rate. We encourage adoption of this approach as a way to accurately evaluate differences in optimum fertilizer levels between or among treatments to better inform future agronomic decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信