教室里的冷战

Iván Garzón Vallejo, Diana María Ramírez Sarmiento
{"title":"教室里的冷战","authors":"Iván Garzón Vallejo, Diana María Ramírez Sarmiento","doi":"10.22518/JOUR.CCSH/2020.2A05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aimed to identify the existence of a canon of authors, schools and subjects in the teaching of contemporary political theory in the undergraduate programs of Political Sciences currently taught in Colombia. From this canon it was formulated a diagnosis of the main approaches and theories in the teaching of contemporary political theory, taking as analysis criteria the way that the canon resolve four epistemological tensions in the sub-discipline: monism vs. pluralism, local vs. global, modernity vs. post-modernity, and disciplinary vs. interdisciplinary. This analysis allowed to conclude that the canon is characterized by a pluralistic, interdisciplinary, local, and modern perspective, and demonstrates a process of redefinition of its problematic borders as well as a relatively refractory spirit to the influx of the Anglo-Saxon political theory.","PeriodicalId":30087,"journal":{"name":"Civilizar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guerra Fría en las aulas\",\"authors\":\"Iván Garzón Vallejo, Diana María Ramírez Sarmiento\",\"doi\":\"10.22518/JOUR.CCSH/2020.2A05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aimed to identify the existence of a canon of authors, schools and subjects in the teaching of contemporary political theory in the undergraduate programs of Political Sciences currently taught in Colombia. From this canon it was formulated a diagnosis of the main approaches and theories in the teaching of contemporary political theory, taking as analysis criteria the way that the canon resolve four epistemological tensions in the sub-discipline: monism vs. pluralism, local vs. global, modernity vs. post-modernity, and disciplinary vs. interdisciplinary. This analysis allowed to conclude that the canon is characterized by a pluralistic, interdisciplinary, local, and modern perspective, and demonstrates a process of redefinition of its problematic borders as well as a relatively refractory spirit to the influx of the Anglo-Saxon political theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civilizar\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civilizar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22518/JOUR.CCSH/2020.2A05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civilizar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22518/JOUR.CCSH/2020.2A05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在确定目前在哥伦比亚政治科学本科课程中当代政治理论教学中存在的作者、学派和学科标准。从这一经典中,它对当代政治理论教学中的主要方法和理论进行了诊断,并将经典解决子学科中四个认识论紧张关系的方式作为分析标准:一元论与多元主义,地方与全球,现代性与后现代性,学科与跨学科。通过分析,我们可以得出这样的结论:经典具有多元化、跨学科、地方性和现代视角的特点,并展示了对其有问题的边界进行重新定义的过程,以及对盎格鲁-撒克逊政治理论涌入的相对难忍的精神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guerra Fría en las aulas
This paper aimed to identify the existence of a canon of authors, schools and subjects in the teaching of contemporary political theory in the undergraduate programs of Political Sciences currently taught in Colombia. From this canon it was formulated a diagnosis of the main approaches and theories in the teaching of contemporary political theory, taking as analysis criteria the way that the canon resolve four epistemological tensions in the sub-discipline: monism vs. pluralism, local vs. global, modernity vs. post-modernity, and disciplinary vs. interdisciplinary. This analysis allowed to conclude that the canon is characterized by a pluralistic, interdisciplinary, local, and modern perspective, and demonstrates a process of redefinition of its problematic borders as well as a relatively refractory spirit to the influx of the Anglo-Saxon political theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信