用脚装惯性测量装置量化职业足球中的技术动作

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Joshua Marris, S. Barrett, G. Abt, C. Towlson
{"title":"用脚装惯性测量装置量化职业足球中的技术动作","authors":"Joshua Marris, S. Barrett, G. Abt, C. Towlson","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2021.1910333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to (i) establish the concurrent validity and intra-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit for monitoring soccer technical actions, (ii) quantify the within-microcycle inter-positional differences in the technical actions of professional soccer training, and (iii) determine the influence of drill category on the technical actions of professional soccer training. Methods Twenty-one professional soccer players’ technical performance data (ball touches, releases, ball touches per minute, releases per minute), collected during training sessions throughout twenty-four weekly microcycles, were analysed using general linear modelling. Results The inertial measurement unit exhibited good concurrent validity (PA = 95.1% – 100.0%) and intra-unit reliability (PA = 95.9% – 96.9%, CV = 1.4% – 2.9%) when compared with retrospective video analyses. The most ball touches ( = 218.0) and releases ( = 110.8) were observed on MD – 1, with MD – 5 eliciting the highest frequency of ball touches ( = 3.8) and releases ( = 1.7) per minute. Central midfielders performed the most ball touches ( = 221.9), releases ( = 108.3), ball touches per minute ( = 3.4) and releases per minute ( = 1.6). Small-sided games evoked more ball touches ( diff = 1.5) and releases per minute ( diff = 0.1) than previously reported in match-play. The fewest ball touches ( = 1.2) and releases per minute ( = 0.5) were observed during tactical drills. Conclusion The results of this study provide a novel understanding of the within-microcycle, inter-positional and drill category differences in the technical actions performed by professional players during training.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"6 1","pages":"203 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2021.1910333","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying technical actions in professional soccer using foot-mounted inertial measurement units\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Marris, S. Barrett, G. Abt, C. Towlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24733938.2021.1910333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to (i) establish the concurrent validity and intra-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit for monitoring soccer technical actions, (ii) quantify the within-microcycle inter-positional differences in the technical actions of professional soccer training, and (iii) determine the influence of drill category on the technical actions of professional soccer training. Methods Twenty-one professional soccer players’ technical performance data (ball touches, releases, ball touches per minute, releases per minute), collected during training sessions throughout twenty-four weekly microcycles, were analysed using general linear modelling. Results The inertial measurement unit exhibited good concurrent validity (PA = 95.1% – 100.0%) and intra-unit reliability (PA = 95.9% – 96.9%, CV = 1.4% – 2.9%) when compared with retrospective video analyses. The most ball touches ( = 218.0) and releases ( = 110.8) were observed on MD – 1, with MD – 5 eliciting the highest frequency of ball touches ( = 3.8) and releases ( = 1.7) per minute. Central midfielders performed the most ball touches ( = 221.9), releases ( = 108.3), ball touches per minute ( = 3.4) and releases per minute ( = 1.6). Small-sided games evoked more ball touches ( diff = 1.5) and releases per minute ( diff = 0.1) than previously reported in match-play. The fewest ball touches ( = 1.2) and releases per minute ( = 0.5) were observed during tactical drills. Conclusion The results of this study provide a novel understanding of the within-microcycle, inter-positional and drill category differences in the technical actions performed by professional players during training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Medicine in Football\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"203 - 214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2021.1910333\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Medicine in Football\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.1910333\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.1910333","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

摘要目的本研究旨在(i)建立用于监测足球技术动作的足部惯性测量单元的并发有效性和单元内可靠性,(ii)量化职业足球训练技术动作的微周期内位置间差异,以及(iii)确定训练类别对职业足球训练技术动作的影响。方法采用一般线性模型对21名职业足球运动员在每周24个微周期的训练中收集的技术表现数据(触球、释放、每分钟触球、每分钟释放)进行分析。结果与回顾性视频分析相比,惯性测量单元表现出良好的并发有效性(PA=95.1%-100.0%)和单元内可靠性(PA=95.9%-96.9%,CV=1.4%-2.9%)。在MD–1上观察到最多的触球次数(=218.0)和释放次数(=110.8),其中MD–5每分钟触球次数和释放次数最高(=3.8)。中场球员的触球次数最多(221.9次),释放次数最多(108.3次),每分钟触球次数(3.4次),以及每分钟释放次数(1.6次)。与之前报道的比赛相比,小范围比赛引发了更多的触球(diff=1.5)和每分钟释放(diff=0.1)。在战术训练中,每分钟触球次数(=1.2)和释放次数(=0.5)最少。结论本研究的结果为职业球员在训练中技术动作的微周期内、位置间和训练类别差异提供了新的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying technical actions in professional soccer using foot-mounted inertial measurement units
ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to (i) establish the concurrent validity and intra-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit for monitoring soccer technical actions, (ii) quantify the within-microcycle inter-positional differences in the technical actions of professional soccer training, and (iii) determine the influence of drill category on the technical actions of professional soccer training. Methods Twenty-one professional soccer players’ technical performance data (ball touches, releases, ball touches per minute, releases per minute), collected during training sessions throughout twenty-four weekly microcycles, were analysed using general linear modelling. Results The inertial measurement unit exhibited good concurrent validity (PA = 95.1% – 100.0%) and intra-unit reliability (PA = 95.9% – 96.9%, CV = 1.4% – 2.9%) when compared with retrospective video analyses. The most ball touches ( = 218.0) and releases ( = 110.8) were observed on MD – 1, with MD – 5 eliciting the highest frequency of ball touches ( = 3.8) and releases ( = 1.7) per minute. Central midfielders performed the most ball touches ( = 221.9), releases ( = 108.3), ball touches per minute ( = 3.4) and releases per minute ( = 1.6). Small-sided games evoked more ball touches ( diff = 1.5) and releases per minute ( diff = 0.1) than previously reported in match-play. The fewest ball touches ( = 1.2) and releases per minute ( = 0.5) were observed during tactical drills. Conclusion The results of this study provide a novel understanding of the within-microcycle, inter-positional and drill category differences in the technical actions performed by professional players during training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信