西塞罗的《赞成巴尔博》中分裂的听众和修辞的演讲

IF 0.6 1区历史学 0 CLASSICS

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-04-08 DOI:10.1353/AJP.2021.0002

Joanna Kenty

{"title":"西塞罗的《赞成巴尔博》中分裂的听众和修辞的演讲","authors":"Joanna Kenty","doi":"10.1353/AJP.2021.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Ancient rhetorical theorists described figured speech (oratio figurata) as a strategy for expressing criticism safely, through a screen of ambiguity. I argue that Cicero's Pro Balbo can be read as figured, communicating criticism of Pompey. Cicero's panegyric to Pompey in this speech would have appeared to be factually accurate and commendable to pro-Pompeian members of the audience, but factually wrong or even insincere to anti-Pompeians. Multiple readings of Cicero's intentions are latent as possible interpretations of the speech because of political divisions and divergent prejudices at the time of its delivery.","PeriodicalId":46128,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","volume":"142 1","pages":"101 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/AJP.2021.0002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divided Audience and Figured Speech in Cicero's Pro Balbo\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Kenty\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/AJP.2021.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Ancient rhetorical theorists described figured speech (oratio figurata) as a strategy for expressing criticism safely, through a screen of ambiguity. I argue that Cicero's Pro Balbo can be read as figured, communicating criticism of Pompey. Cicero's panegyric to Pompey in this speech would have appeared to be factually accurate and commendable to pro-Pompeian members of the audience, but factually wrong or even insincere to anti-Pompeians. Multiple readings of Cicero's intentions are latent as possible interpretations of the speech because of political divisions and divergent prejudices at the time of its delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/AJP.2021.0002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/AJP.2021.0002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AJP.2021.0002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:古代修辞学理论家将修辞修辞描述为一种通过模糊的屏障安全地表达批评的策略。我认为西塞罗的《赞成巴尔博》可以被解读为形象，传达了对庞培的批评。西塞罗在演讲中对庞培的赞美诗，对于支持庞培的听众来说，实际上是准确的，值得赞扬的，但对于反对庞培的听众来说，实际上是错误的，甚至是不真诚的。对西塞罗意图的多重解读是潜在的，可能的解释，因为政治分歧和不同的偏见，在演讲的时候。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Divided Audience and Figured Speech in Cicero's Pro Balbo

Abstract:Ancient rhetorical theorists described figured speech (oratio figurata) as a strategy for expressing criticism safely, through a screen of ambiguity. I argue that Cicero's Pro Balbo can be read as figured, communicating criticism of Pompey. Cicero's panegyric to Pompey in this speech would have appeared to be factually accurate and commendable to pro-Pompeian members of the audience, but factually wrong or even insincere to anti-Pompeians. Multiple readings of Cicero's intentions are latent as possible interpretations of the speech because of political divisions and divergent prejudices at the time of its delivery.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1880, American Journal of Philology (AJP) has helped to shape American classical scholarship. Today, the Journal has achieved worldwide recognition as a forum for international exchange among classicists and philologists by publishing original research in classical literature, philology, linguistics, history, society, religion, philosophy, and cultural and material studies. Book review sections are featured in every issue. AJP is open to a wide variety of contemporary and interdisciplinary approaches, including literary interpretation and theory, historical investigation, and textual criticism.