农药累积膳食风险评估方法

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Eloisa D Caldas
{"title":"农药累积膳食风险评估方法","authors":"Eloisa D Caldas","doi":"10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Strategies to estimate the risks from dietary exposure to multiple pesticides have been developed since the 1980s, based on the dose-addition of substances within a mixture with similar biological activity that differ in their potencies. In this paper, the different strategies to estimate the exposure and characterize the cumulative risks are presented and discussed, and some studies conducted in the last three years are reviewed. The main challenge is to define a cumulative assessment group (CAG), which depends primarily on a sound and high-quality toxicological database. Owing to the complexity of the process, harmonization has not yet been reached among regulatory agencies, and the process is not used for setting maximum residue levels. Most studies conducted around the world have shown potential health risks from cumulative exposure only when very conservative assumptions are used in the assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54291,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches for cumulative dietary risk assessment of pesticides\",\"authors\":\"Eloisa D Caldas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Strategies to estimate the risks from dietary exposure to multiple pesticides have been developed since the 1980s, based on the dose-addition of substances within a mixture with similar biological activity that differ in their potencies. In this paper, the different strategies to estimate the exposure and characterize the cumulative risks are presented and discussed, and some studies conducted in the last three years are reviewed. The main challenge is to define a cumulative assessment group (CAG), which depends primarily on a sound and high-quality toxicological database. Owing to the complexity of the process, harmonization has not yet been reached among regulatory agencies, and the process is not used for setting maximum residue levels. Most studies conducted around the world have shown potential health risks from cumulative exposure only when very conservative assumptions are used in the assessment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Food Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799323000942\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799323000942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自20世纪80年代以来,根据在具有相似生物活性但效力不同的混合物中添加物质的剂量,已经制定了评估饮食暴露于多种农药风险的策略。本文介绍和讨论了评估暴露和描述累积风险的不同策略,并对近三年来进行的一些研究进行了回顾。主要的挑战是确定一个累积评估小组(CAG),这主要依赖于一个健全和高质量的毒理学数据库。由于该过程的复杂性,监管机构之间尚未达成统一,该过程不用于设定最大残留水平。在世界各地进行的大多数研究表明,只有在评估中采用非常保守的假设时,累积接触才会造成潜在的健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaches for cumulative dietary risk assessment of pesticides

Strategies to estimate the risks from dietary exposure to multiple pesticides have been developed since the 1980s, based on the dose-addition of substances within a mixture with similar biological activity that differ in their potencies. In this paper, the different strategies to estimate the exposure and characterize the cumulative risks are presented and discussed, and some studies conducted in the last three years are reviewed. The main challenge is to define a cumulative assessment group (CAG), which depends primarily on a sound and high-quality toxicological database. Owing to the complexity of the process, harmonization has not yet been reached among regulatory agencies, and the process is not used for setting maximum residue levels. Most studies conducted around the world have shown potential health risks from cumulative exposure only when very conservative assumptions are used in the assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Food Science
Current Opinion in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Food Science specifically provides expert views on current advances in food science in a clear and readable format. It also evaluates the most noteworthy papers from original publications, annotated by experts. Key Features: Expert Views on Current Advances: Clear and readable insights from experts in the field regarding current advances in food science. Evaluation of Noteworthy Papers: Annotated evaluations of the most interesting papers from the extensive array of original publications. Themed Sections: The subject of food science is divided into themed sections, each reviewed once a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信