留给专家:竞争的比较分析——竞争法律私人执行中的专家非专业法官

Q3 Social Sciences
Lena Hornkohl
{"title":"留给专家:竞争的比较分析——竞争法律私人执行中的专家非专业法官","authors":"Lena Hornkohl","doi":"10.7172/1689-9024.yars.2022.15.25.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the procedural instrument of ‘competition-expert’ lay judges to ease damages calculations and private actions for damages for the violation of competition law in general. To this end, the paper analyses various forms of ‘expert’ lay participation that already exist in Europe. It concentrates, in particular, on commercial and intellectual property proceedings, but also delves into the few existing examples of competition-expert lay judges for private enforcement of competition law. It assesses their transferability for competition damages proceedings and attempts to test EU and national competition as well as procedural law boundaries more generally. The paper considers common grounds, advantages and disadvantages, as well as best practices in this context. It concludes with early proposals for including competition-expert lay judges in private enforcement of competition law.","PeriodicalId":36276,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leave it to the experts: A comparative analysis of competition-expert lay judges in private enforcement of competition law\",\"authors\":\"Lena Hornkohl\",\"doi\":\"10.7172/1689-9024.yars.2022.15.25.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on the procedural instrument of ‘competition-expert’ lay judges to ease damages calculations and private actions for damages for the violation of competition law in general. To this end, the paper analyses various forms of ‘expert’ lay participation that already exist in Europe. It concentrates, in particular, on commercial and intellectual property proceedings, but also delves into the few existing examples of competition-expert lay judges for private enforcement of competition law. It assesses their transferability for competition damages proceedings and attempts to test EU and national competition as well as procedural law boundaries more generally. The paper considers common grounds, advantages and disadvantages, as well as best practices in this context. It concludes with early proposals for including competition-expert lay judges in private enforcement of competition law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.yars.2022.15.25.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.yars.2022.15.25.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文侧重于“竞争专家”非专业法官的程序工具,以简化损害赔偿的计算和一般违反竞争法的损害赔偿的私人诉讼。为此,本文分析了欧洲已经存在的各种形式的“专家”外行参与。它特别集中于商业和知识产权诉讼,但也深入研究了少数几个现有的竞争专家非专业法官对竞争法私人执行的例子。它评估了它们在竞争损害赔偿程序中的可转移性,并试图更普遍地测试欧盟和国家竞争以及程序法边界。本文考虑了在此背景下的共同点、优点和缺点以及最佳实践。最后,它提出了在竞争法的私人执行中纳入竞争专家非专业法官的早期建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leave it to the experts: A comparative analysis of competition-expert lay judges in private enforcement of competition law
This paper focuses on the procedural instrument of ‘competition-expert’ lay judges to ease damages calculations and private actions for damages for the violation of competition law in general. To this end, the paper analyses various forms of ‘expert’ lay participation that already exist in Europe. It concentrates, in particular, on commercial and intellectual property proceedings, but also delves into the few existing examples of competition-expert lay judges for private enforcement of competition law. It assesses their transferability for competition damages proceedings and attempts to test EU and national competition as well as procedural law boundaries more generally. The paper considers common grounds, advantages and disadvantages, as well as best practices in this context. It concludes with early proposals for including competition-expert lay judges in private enforcement of competition law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信