制度制定:个人、人际和组织视角

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Cathleen M. Morey
{"title":"制度制定:个人、人际和组织视角","authors":"Cathleen M. Morey","doi":"10.1080/00377317.2019.1682425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Enactment is primarily conceptualized as a phenomenon occurring in the therapeutic dyad. This paper presents a relational construct of enactment as it manifests in the individual, interpersonal and organizational matrix of a clinical system. System enactments are ubiquitous phenomena that emerge with clients and staff in the relational field of a system that involves multiple participants with mutual and intersecting subjectivities; yet, there is little information about this type of enactment in the literature. This phenomenon often occurs in the context of power struggles and ruptures in the alliance with the client, and difficulties in the working relationships between treatment staff, which if not engaged, can result in negative therapeutic outcomes. A fictionalized case example demonstrates how this construct guides systems-based clinical practice. Implications for social work education, practice and training, and suggestions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45273,"journal":{"name":"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK","volume":"89 1","pages":"113 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00377317.2019.1682425","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System Enactment: An Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Cathleen M. Morey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00377317.2019.1682425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Enactment is primarily conceptualized as a phenomenon occurring in the therapeutic dyad. This paper presents a relational construct of enactment as it manifests in the individual, interpersonal and organizational matrix of a clinical system. System enactments are ubiquitous phenomena that emerge with clients and staff in the relational field of a system that involves multiple participants with mutual and intersecting subjectivities; yet, there is little information about this type of enactment in the literature. This phenomenon often occurs in the context of power struggles and ruptures in the alliance with the client, and difficulties in the working relationships between treatment staff, which if not engaged, can result in negative therapeutic outcomes. A fictionalized case example demonstrates how this construct guides systems-based clinical practice. Implications for social work education, practice and training, and suggestions for future research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00377317.2019.1682425\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2019.1682425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2019.1682425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

颁布主要被概念化为一种发生在治疗二元体内的现象。本文提出了一种制定的关系结构,它体现在临床系统的个人、人际和组织矩阵中。系统制定是一种普遍存在的现象,在一个系统的关系领域中,客户和员工都会出现这种现象,该系统涉及具有相互和交叉主观主义的多个参与者;然而,文献中关于这种类型的制定的信息很少。这种现象经常发生在权力斗争和与客户联盟破裂的背景下,以及治疗人员之间工作关系的困难,如果不参与,可能会导致负面的治疗结果。一个虚构的案例展示了这种结构如何指导基于系统的临床实践。讨论了对社会工作教育、实践和培训的启示,以及对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System Enactment: An Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Perspective
ABSTRACT Enactment is primarily conceptualized as a phenomenon occurring in the therapeutic dyad. This paper presents a relational construct of enactment as it manifests in the individual, interpersonal and organizational matrix of a clinical system. System enactments are ubiquitous phenomena that emerge with clients and staff in the relational field of a system that involves multiple participants with mutual and intersecting subjectivities; yet, there is little information about this type of enactment in the literature. This phenomenon often occurs in the context of power struggles and ruptures in the alliance with the client, and difficulties in the working relationships between treatment staff, which if not engaged, can result in negative therapeutic outcomes. A fictionalized case example demonstrates how this construct guides systems-based clinical practice. Implications for social work education, practice and training, and suggestions for future research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Smith College Studies in Social Work focuses on the vital issues facing practitioners today, featuring only those articles that advance theoretical understanding of psychological and social functioning, present clinically relevant research findings, and promote excellence in clinical practice. This refereed journal addresses issues of mental health, therapeutic process, trauma and recovery, psychopathology, racial and cultural diversity, culturally responsive clinical practice, intersubjectivity, the influence of postmodern theory on clinical practice, community based practice, and clinical services for specific populations of psychologically and socially vulnerable clients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信