在治理改革20周年之际:在马来西亚二十年的变革后,重新审视公司治理与透明度的关系

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS
H. S. Nahar, Maslinawati Mohamad
{"title":"在治理改革20周年之际:在马来西亚二十年的变革后,重新审视公司治理与透明度的关系","authors":"H. S. Nahar, Maslinawati Mohamad","doi":"10.1108/jabs-11-2021-0467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to fill the governance literature void by answering the seemingly unanswered vintage questions regarding governance reform effectiveness towards ensuring a firm’s financial reporting transparency (FRT) in an emerging country of Malaysia. It involves an assessment of the specific maintained assumption in its governance code (Code) introduced two decades ago that the Code would improve FRT through the direct channel of governance practices improvement.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe measured FRT as proxied by the firm’s accruals quality is examined across different governance regimes of pre- and post-Code periods. This paper conjectures that the firm’s FRT should improve post-Code period, evidencing reform effectiveness towards ensuring enhanced governance practices.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that while governance reform improves governance practices, it did not, however, bring improved FRT of firms. The interaction analysis provides evidence of the Code’s ability to favourably moderate the link between the firm’s FRT and several board attributes, suggesting improvement in governance practices in ensuring the firm’s FRT pursuant to the introduction of a formally written and legally backed governance code.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper contributes to the extent of governance and FRT literature in developing economies in at least two specific ways. First, the paper presents evidence on public policy implications towards governance practices and the firms’ FRT. Second, it contributes to the public policy debate concerning governance reform effectiveness from the specific angle of the firms’ FRT, thereby confirming the potential conditions upon which the “maintained assumption” would be valid.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research contributes to the extent of governance and FRT literature in emerging economies by studying the dynamic roles of governance in influencing firms’ FRT across governance regime change, something which governance literature repertoire seems to neglect. It also contributes to the public policy debate concerning governance reform effectiveness from the specific angle of the firm’s FRT by evidencing the strategic role of governance reform in influencing the financial reporting behaviour of Malaysian listed firms.\n","PeriodicalId":46138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia Business Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the 20th governance reform anniversary: revisiting corporate governance and transparency nexus after two decades of change in Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"H. S. Nahar, Maslinawati Mohamad\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jabs-11-2021-0467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to fill the governance literature void by answering the seemingly unanswered vintage questions regarding governance reform effectiveness towards ensuring a firm’s financial reporting transparency (FRT) in an emerging country of Malaysia. It involves an assessment of the specific maintained assumption in its governance code (Code) introduced two decades ago that the Code would improve FRT through the direct channel of governance practices improvement.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe measured FRT as proxied by the firm’s accruals quality is examined across different governance regimes of pre- and post-Code periods. This paper conjectures that the firm’s FRT should improve post-Code period, evidencing reform effectiveness towards ensuring enhanced governance practices.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results indicate that while governance reform improves governance practices, it did not, however, bring improved FRT of firms. The interaction analysis provides evidence of the Code’s ability to favourably moderate the link between the firm’s FRT and several board attributes, suggesting improvement in governance practices in ensuring the firm’s FRT pursuant to the introduction of a formally written and legally backed governance code.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis paper contributes to the extent of governance and FRT literature in developing economies in at least two specific ways. First, the paper presents evidence on public policy implications towards governance practices and the firms’ FRT. Second, it contributes to the public policy debate concerning governance reform effectiveness from the specific angle of the firms’ FRT, thereby confirming the potential conditions upon which the “maintained assumption” would be valid.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research contributes to the extent of governance and FRT literature in emerging economies by studying the dynamic roles of governance in influencing firms’ FRT across governance regime change, something which governance literature repertoire seems to neglect. It also contributes to the public policy debate concerning governance reform effectiveness from the specific angle of the firm’s FRT by evidencing the strategic role of governance reform in influencing the financial reporting behaviour of Malaysian listed firms.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asia Business Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asia Business Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-11-2021-0467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-11-2021-0467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文旨在通过回答关于治理改革有效性的古老问题来填补治理文献的空白,以确保马来西亚这个新兴国家的公司财务报告透明度。它涉及对20年前引入的治理准则(准则)中保持的具体假设的评估,即准则将通过治理实践改进的直接渠道来改进FRT。设计/方法/方法由公司应计项目质量代表的衡量FRT在《准则》前后的不同治理制度中进行了检查。本文推测,该公司的FRT应该改善后代码时期,证明改革的有效性,以确保加强治理实践。研究结果表明,治理改革虽然改善了治理实践,但并没有提高企业的FRT。互动分析提供了证据,证明《准则》有能力有利地缓和公司的FRT与几个董事会属性之间的联系,表明根据正式书面和法律支持的治理准则的引入,在确保公司FRT方面的治理实践有所改进。实际含义本文至少以两种具体方式对发展中经济体的治理和FRT文献的范围做出了贡献。首先,本文提供了公共政策对治理实践和企业FRT影响的证据。其次,它从企业FRT的特定角度为关于治理改革有效性的公共政策辩论做出了贡献,从而证实了“维持假设”有效的潜在条件。独创性/价值这项研究通过研究治理在治理制度变化中影响企业FRT的动态作用,对新兴经济体的治理和FRT文献的范围做出了贡献,而治理文献似乎忽略了这一点。它还通过证明治理改革在影响马来西亚上市公司财务报告行为方面的战略作用,从公司FRT的特定角度为关于治理改革有效性的公共政策辩论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the 20th governance reform anniversary: revisiting corporate governance and transparency nexus after two decades of change in Malaysia
Purpose This paper aims to fill the governance literature void by answering the seemingly unanswered vintage questions regarding governance reform effectiveness towards ensuring a firm’s financial reporting transparency (FRT) in an emerging country of Malaysia. It involves an assessment of the specific maintained assumption in its governance code (Code) introduced two decades ago that the Code would improve FRT through the direct channel of governance practices improvement. Design/methodology/approach The measured FRT as proxied by the firm’s accruals quality is examined across different governance regimes of pre- and post-Code periods. This paper conjectures that the firm’s FRT should improve post-Code period, evidencing reform effectiveness towards ensuring enhanced governance practices. Findings The results indicate that while governance reform improves governance practices, it did not, however, bring improved FRT of firms. The interaction analysis provides evidence of the Code’s ability to favourably moderate the link between the firm’s FRT and several board attributes, suggesting improvement in governance practices in ensuring the firm’s FRT pursuant to the introduction of a formally written and legally backed governance code. Practical implications This paper contributes to the extent of governance and FRT literature in developing economies in at least two specific ways. First, the paper presents evidence on public policy implications towards governance practices and the firms’ FRT. Second, it contributes to the public policy debate concerning governance reform effectiveness from the specific angle of the firms’ FRT, thereby confirming the potential conditions upon which the “maintained assumption” would be valid. Originality/value This research contributes to the extent of governance and FRT literature in emerging economies by studying the dynamic roles of governance in influencing firms’ FRT across governance regime change, something which governance literature repertoire seems to neglect. It also contributes to the public policy debate concerning governance reform effectiveness from the specific angle of the firm’s FRT by evidencing the strategic role of governance reform in influencing the financial reporting behaviour of Malaysian listed firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信