对知识库的思考

IF 0.6 4区管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Serials Review Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1080/00987913.2022.2108304

T. Buck

{"title":"对知识库的思考","authors":"T. Buck","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2022.2108304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Library knowledgebases (kbs) have improved generation by generation, product by product over the last three or four decades. Functionality, completeness, integration with other library systems, and the standardization of useful data elements have all increased particularly via the Knowledgebases and Related Tools (KBART) Recommended Practice (RP), KBART Automation RP, and the upcoming NISO recommendation for package identifiers. However, several more fields and limiters would greatly enhance kbs for staff users. These include additional date fields, indicators for consortia- or region-specific packages, curator/responsible party, and more.","PeriodicalId":54165,"journal":{"name":"Serials Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoughts for the Knowledgebase\",\"authors\":\"T. Buck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00987913.2022.2108304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Library knowledgebases (kbs) have improved generation by generation, product by product over the last three or four decades. Functionality, completeness, integration with other library systems, and the standardization of useful data elements have all increased particularly via the Knowledgebases and Related Tools (KBART) Recommended Practice (RP), KBART Automation RP, and the upcoming NISO recommendation for package identifiers. However, several more fields and limiters would greatly enhance kbs for staff users. These include additional date fields, indicators for consortia- or region-specific packages, curator/responsible party, and more.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serials Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serials Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2022.2108304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serials Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2022.2108304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在过去的三四十年里，图书馆知识库(kbs)一代又一代、一个产品又一个产品地得到了改进。通过知识库和相关工具(KBART)推荐实践(RP)、KBART自动化实践和即将发布的NISO包标识符推荐，功能、完整性、与其他库系统的集成以及有用数据元素的标准化都得到了提高。但是，增加几个字段和限制符将大大增强工作人员用户的kbs。这些包括额外的日期字段、特定于联盟或区域的包的指示器、管理者/责任方等等。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Thoughts for the Knowledgebase

Abstract Library knowledgebases (kbs) have improved generation by generation, product by product over the last three or four decades. Functionality, completeness, integration with other library systems, and the standardization of useful data elements have all increased particularly via the Knowledgebases and Related Tools (KBART) Recommended Practice (RP), KBART Automation RP, and the upcoming NISO recommendation for package identifiers. However, several more fields and limiters would greatly enhance kbs for staff users. These include additional date fields, indicators for consortia- or region-specific packages, curator/responsible party, and more.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Serials Review INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Serials Review, issued quarterly, is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal for the international serials community. Articles focus on serials in the broadest sense of the term and cover all aspects of serials information; regular columns feature interviews, exchanges on controversial topics, book reviews, and conference reports. The journal encompasses practical, theoretical, and visionary ideas for librarians, publishers, vendors, and anyone interested in the changing nature of serials. Serials Review covers all aspects of serials management: format considerations, publishing models, statistical studies, collection analysis, collaborative efforts, reference and access issues, cataloging and acquisitions, people who have shaped the serials community, and topical bibliographic studies.