{"title":"审查跨境合并的合法性：找到合适的方法","authors":"Philip Morrison","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2018.1555984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Before a cross-border merger can be completed, it must be sanctioned by the designated authority in the transferee Member State. Uncertainty has arisen as to the proper test for the English court to apply at this stage. This article argues that the approach from Re Diamond Resorts Plc, involving a intensive scrutiny of the benefits and disbenefits to stakeholders, does not represent the proper approach under the Cross-Border Merger Directive.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"367 - 386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2018.1555984","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scrutinising the legality of cross-border mergers: finding the proper approach\",\"authors\":\"Philip Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735970.2018.1555984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Before a cross-border merger can be completed, it must be sanctioned by the designated authority in the transferee Member State. Uncertainty has arisen as to the proper test for the English court to apply at this stage. This article argues that the approach from Re Diamond Resorts Plc, involving a intensive scrutiny of the benefits and disbenefits to stakeholders, does not represent the proper approach under the Cross-Border Merger Directive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"367 - 386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2018.1555984\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2018.1555984\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2018.1555984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scrutinising the legality of cross-border mergers: finding the proper approach
ABSTRACT Before a cross-border merger can be completed, it must be sanctioned by the designated authority in the transferee Member State. Uncertainty has arisen as to the proper test for the English court to apply at this stage. This article argues that the approach from Re Diamond Resorts Plc, involving a intensive scrutiny of the benefits and disbenefits to stakeholders, does not represent the proper approach under the Cross-Border Merger Directive.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
