探究高能力大学生不同专业创造力的差异

Q3 Social Sciences
Angie L. Miller, V. Smith
{"title":"探究高能力大学生不同专业创造力的差异","authors":"Angie L. Miller, V. Smith","doi":"10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many current theories and models include creativity as a component of giftedness, conceptualizing the construct in numerous ways that complement giftedness. Variations in creativity have also been studied among different academic disciplines, suggesting that although there may be higher levels of creativity for some, major choice is a complex concept. The current study explores differences in several aspects of creativity based on academic major for a high-ability young adult population. Using data from 399 Honors College students at a Midwestern university in the United States, a MANOVA and series of 1-way ANOVAs suggest significant differences by academic major for creative engagement, creative cognitive style, and fantasy, but not for tolerance or spontaneity. The pattern of results generally indicates higher creativity among arts and humanities majors, compared with other disciplines such as education and pre-professional training, although these fields can also benefit from creative input. Potential curricular and experiential reasons for these differences are discussed, along with some implications for educational programming and interventions.","PeriodicalId":52310,"journal":{"name":"Gifted and Talented International","volume":"32 1","pages":"44 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring differences in creativity across academic majors for high-ability college students\",\"authors\":\"Angie L. Miller, V. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Many current theories and models include creativity as a component of giftedness, conceptualizing the construct in numerous ways that complement giftedness. Variations in creativity have also been studied among different academic disciplines, suggesting that although there may be higher levels of creativity for some, major choice is a complex concept. The current study explores differences in several aspects of creativity based on academic major for a high-ability young adult population. Using data from 399 Honors College students at a Midwestern university in the United States, a MANOVA and series of 1-way ANOVAs suggest significant differences by academic major for creative engagement, creative cognitive style, and fantasy, but not for tolerance or spontaneity. The pattern of results generally indicates higher creativity among arts and humanities majors, compared with other disciplines such as education and pre-professional training, although these fields can also benefit from creative input. Potential curricular and experiential reasons for these differences are discussed, along with some implications for educational programming and interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gifted and Talented International\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gifted and Talented International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted and Talented International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

许多当前的理论和模型都将创造力作为天赋的一个组成部分,并以多种方式将其概念化,以补充天赋。创造力的差异也在不同的学科中被研究过,这表明尽管有些人的创造力水平可能更高,但专业选择是一个复杂的概念。本研究探讨了高能力青年群体在不同专业的创造力方面的差异。利用来自美国中西部一所大学的399名荣誉学院学生的数据,方差分析和一系列单因素方差分析表明,不同专业在创造性投入、创造性认知风格和幻想方面存在显著差异,但在容忍度和自发性方面没有显著差异。结果的模式通常表明,与教育和职前培训等其他学科相比,艺术和人文专业的学生具有更高的创造力,尽管这些领域也可以从创造性投入中受益。讨论了这些差异的潜在课程和经验原因,以及对教育规划和干预的一些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring differences in creativity across academic majors for high-ability college students
ABSTRACT Many current theories and models include creativity as a component of giftedness, conceptualizing the construct in numerous ways that complement giftedness. Variations in creativity have also been studied among different academic disciplines, suggesting that although there may be higher levels of creativity for some, major choice is a complex concept. The current study explores differences in several aspects of creativity based on academic major for a high-ability young adult population. Using data from 399 Honors College students at a Midwestern university in the United States, a MANOVA and series of 1-way ANOVAs suggest significant differences by academic major for creative engagement, creative cognitive style, and fantasy, but not for tolerance or spontaneity. The pattern of results generally indicates higher creativity among arts and humanities majors, compared with other disciplines such as education and pre-professional training, although these fields can also benefit from creative input. Potential curricular and experiential reasons for these differences are discussed, along with some implications for educational programming and interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gifted and Talented International
Gifted and Talented International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信