介绍

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
S. Radchenko
{"title":"介绍","authors":"S. Radchenko","doi":"10.1353/apr.2023.a905228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On February 4, 2022, during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s brief visit to Beijing, he and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping gave their blessing to a joint statement. Even against the backdrop of increasingly close Sino-Russian relations, this statement raised eyebrows among seasoned experts. With its ideological underpinning—an emphasis on shared values, however vaguely construed, as well as shared interests— the statement suggested that the relationship was evolving toward something resembling an outright alliance, a scenario previously deemed improbable. China and Russia, with their divergent interests and ambitions, and potential areas of conflict in Central Asia and the Arctic, seemed best placed to maintain an alignment, with each side retaining considerable room for maneuver. Was this pragmatic alignment coming to an end, giving place to a new kind of partnership with much more tightly coordinated global postures, a partnership that, as the statement bravely proclaimed, was “without limits”? Before observers had a chance to fully digest the implications of the statement, Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine. We know today that he had not shared his plans with Xi Jinping, certainly not in any concrete form. Nevertheless, Putin’s very trip to China before the start of the invasion suggested, however wrongly, a degree of coordination or at least a meeting of minds between two ruthless authoritarians who had each made their relationship a lynchpin of China’s and Russia’s foreign policies. Russia soon became mired in a conflict Putin got badly wrong while Beijing struggled to accommodate Russia’s failings and extend a helping hand to Putin without triggering Western secondary sanctions that could have a very harmful impact on China’s economic interests. When Xi Jinping turned up in Moscow in March 2023—his first visit since the invasion—the language about the partnership “without limits” conspicuously disappeared from the joint documents: reality itself seemed to be dictating limits and constraining Putin’s and Xi’s ambitions. Xi’s visit only served to highlight Russia’s deepening international isolation. Having defiantly and purposefully burned all bridges with the West, the Russian leadership appeared direly in need of friends. China—","PeriodicalId":45424,"journal":{"name":"Asian Perspective","volume":"47 1","pages":"341 - 347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction\",\"authors\":\"S. Radchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/apr.2023.a905228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On February 4, 2022, during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s brief visit to Beijing, he and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping gave their blessing to a joint statement. Even against the backdrop of increasingly close Sino-Russian relations, this statement raised eyebrows among seasoned experts. With its ideological underpinning—an emphasis on shared values, however vaguely construed, as well as shared interests— the statement suggested that the relationship was evolving toward something resembling an outright alliance, a scenario previously deemed improbable. China and Russia, with their divergent interests and ambitions, and potential areas of conflict in Central Asia and the Arctic, seemed best placed to maintain an alignment, with each side retaining considerable room for maneuver. Was this pragmatic alignment coming to an end, giving place to a new kind of partnership with much more tightly coordinated global postures, a partnership that, as the statement bravely proclaimed, was “without limits”? Before observers had a chance to fully digest the implications of the statement, Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine. We know today that he had not shared his plans with Xi Jinping, certainly not in any concrete form. Nevertheless, Putin’s very trip to China before the start of the invasion suggested, however wrongly, a degree of coordination or at least a meeting of minds between two ruthless authoritarians who had each made their relationship a lynchpin of China’s and Russia’s foreign policies. Russia soon became mired in a conflict Putin got badly wrong while Beijing struggled to accommodate Russia’s failings and extend a helping hand to Putin without triggering Western secondary sanctions that could have a very harmful impact on China’s economic interests. When Xi Jinping turned up in Moscow in March 2023—his first visit since the invasion—the language about the partnership “without limits” conspicuously disappeared from the joint documents: reality itself seemed to be dictating limits and constraining Putin’s and Xi’s ambitions. Xi’s visit only served to highlight Russia’s deepening international isolation. Having defiantly and purposefully burned all bridges with the West, the Russian leadership appeared direly in need of friends. China—\",\"PeriodicalId\":45424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Perspective\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"341 - 347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2023.a905228\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2023.a905228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即使在中俄关系日益密切的背景下,这一声明也让经验丰富的专家感到惊讶。在其意识形态的基础上——强调共同的价值观,无论如何模糊地解释,以及共同的利益——声明表明,两国关系正朝着类似于完全联盟的方向发展,而这种情况此前被认为是不可能的。中国和俄罗斯有着不同的利益和野心,在中亚和北极地区也有潜在的冲突,两国似乎最适合保持结盟,双方都有相当大的回旋余地。这种务实的结盟是否即将结束,让位于一种全球姿态更加紧密协调的新型伙伴关系?正如声明勇敢地宣称的那样,这种伙伴关系是“没有限制的”?观察人士还没来得及完全理解这一声明的含义,弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin)就下令入侵乌克兰。然而,普京在入侵开始前的中国之行,无论多么错误地表明,两个冷酷的独裁者之间有一定程度的协调,或者至少是思想上的会面,他们都把他们的关系作为中俄外交政策的关键。俄罗斯很快就陷入了一场普京犯了大错的冲突中,而北京则努力适应俄罗斯的失败,并在不引发西方二级制裁的情况下向普京伸出援助之手,而这种制裁可能会对中国的经济利益产生非常有害的影响。在公然和有目的地斩断了与西方的所有桥梁之后,俄罗斯领导层似乎迫切需要朋友。中国- - - - - -
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction
On February 4, 2022, during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s brief visit to Beijing, he and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping gave their blessing to a joint statement. Even against the backdrop of increasingly close Sino-Russian relations, this statement raised eyebrows among seasoned experts. With its ideological underpinning—an emphasis on shared values, however vaguely construed, as well as shared interests— the statement suggested that the relationship was evolving toward something resembling an outright alliance, a scenario previously deemed improbable. China and Russia, with their divergent interests and ambitions, and potential areas of conflict in Central Asia and the Arctic, seemed best placed to maintain an alignment, with each side retaining considerable room for maneuver. Was this pragmatic alignment coming to an end, giving place to a new kind of partnership with much more tightly coordinated global postures, a partnership that, as the statement bravely proclaimed, was “without limits”? Before observers had a chance to fully digest the implications of the statement, Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine. We know today that he had not shared his plans with Xi Jinping, certainly not in any concrete form. Nevertheless, Putin’s very trip to China before the start of the invasion suggested, however wrongly, a degree of coordination or at least a meeting of minds between two ruthless authoritarians who had each made their relationship a lynchpin of China’s and Russia’s foreign policies. Russia soon became mired in a conflict Putin got badly wrong while Beijing struggled to accommodate Russia’s failings and extend a helping hand to Putin without triggering Western secondary sanctions that could have a very harmful impact on China’s economic interests. When Xi Jinping turned up in Moscow in March 2023—his first visit since the invasion—the language about the partnership “without limits” conspicuously disappeared from the joint documents: reality itself seemed to be dictating limits and constraining Putin’s and Xi’s ambitions. Xi’s visit only served to highlight Russia’s deepening international isolation. Having defiantly and purposefully burned all bridges with the West, the Russian leadership appeared direly in need of friends. China—
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Perspective
Asian Perspective INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: ASIAN PERSPECTIVE is the peer-reviewed social sciences journal of world/comparative politics of the Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University. Published quarterly, Asian Perspective has devoted its pages to critical analysis of the global, regional, and transnational issues affecting Northeast Asia for over 25 years. Bringing cogent, thought-provoking examination of the significant developments in Asia and the world as they unfold to the scrutiny of its readership, Asian Perspective continues to promote a healthy exchange of ideas among scholars, students, and policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信