粮食问题:国际(营销)努力在应对迫在眉睫的气候威胁中的作用

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Rūta Ruževičiūtė, Carina Thürridl
{"title":"粮食问题:国际(营销)努力在应对迫在眉睫的气候威胁中的作用","authors":"Rūta Ruževičiūtė, Carina Thürridl","doi":"10.1177/1069031X231182257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global food system (i.e., production, transport, processing, packaging, storage, retail, consumption, loss, and waste of food) is responsible for 34% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2021). A significant proportion of these emissions (14.5%) are directly attributable to the production and consumption of meat (Stoll-Kleemann and Schmidt 2017) and the loss and waste of food (8%–10%, estimated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]). Many international organizations such as the IPCC or the European Commission (EC) thus agree that two effective demand-side ways to cut emissions from food are a collective shift toward more plant-based diets and global efforts to reduce food waste. Taken together, these two approaches could reduce the negative effects on global warming, such as a rise in temperatures, by an estimated 55%. Food preferences are largely determined by socioeconomic factors, cultural practices, and social norms (Steenkamp 2019; Stoll-Kleemann and Schmidt 2017) and thus differ greatly across countries (Godfray et al. 2018). Similarly, while roughly 30%–40% of all food is lost or wasted in both the developed and developing world, the underlying causes are very different due to variances in infrastructure, shopping practices, and knowledge of and investment in proper food storage (Godfray et al. 2010). As a result, there is great potential for international marketers and policy makers to contribute to a shift toward more sustainable diets and a reduction of food waste, for example, through the effective design of interventions and behavior change campaigns that take into consideration the specific conditions of these local markets. Research on the topic in the (international) marketing domain is scarce, however. A brief search in the relevant marketing journals (e.g., Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Psychology), conducted in spring of 2023, identified eight articles on the topics of meat reduction, plant-based diets, and food waste, but no articles on these topics had been published in the Journal of International Marketing. Yet, understanding how changes in food consumption patterns can help buffer against the negative effects of climate change requires a global lens, as food systems are interlinked and the negative effects of food systems on climate change and vice versa disproportionately affect non-Western countries (e.g., due to more extreme shifts in climate). In this commentary, we thus call for more research that addresses demand-side GHG emission mitigation strategies related to food—that is, the reduction of meat consumption and food waste—from an international marketing perspective.","PeriodicalId":48081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Matters: The Role of International (Marketing) Efforts in Addressing a Looming Climate Threat\",\"authors\":\"Rūta Ruževičiūtė, Carina Thürridl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1069031X231182257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The global food system (i.e., production, transport, processing, packaging, storage, retail, consumption, loss, and waste of food) is responsible for 34% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2021). A significant proportion of these emissions (14.5%) are directly attributable to the production and consumption of meat (Stoll-Kleemann and Schmidt 2017) and the loss and waste of food (8%–10%, estimated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]). Many international organizations such as the IPCC or the European Commission (EC) thus agree that two effective demand-side ways to cut emissions from food are a collective shift toward more plant-based diets and global efforts to reduce food waste. Taken together, these two approaches could reduce the negative effects on global warming, such as a rise in temperatures, by an estimated 55%. Food preferences are largely determined by socioeconomic factors, cultural practices, and social norms (Steenkamp 2019; Stoll-Kleemann and Schmidt 2017) and thus differ greatly across countries (Godfray et al. 2018). Similarly, while roughly 30%–40% of all food is lost or wasted in both the developed and developing world, the underlying causes are very different due to variances in infrastructure, shopping practices, and knowledge of and investment in proper food storage (Godfray et al. 2010). As a result, there is great potential for international marketers and policy makers to contribute to a shift toward more sustainable diets and a reduction of food waste, for example, through the effective design of interventions and behavior change campaigns that take into consideration the specific conditions of these local markets. Research on the topic in the (international) marketing domain is scarce, however. A brief search in the relevant marketing journals (e.g., Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Psychology), conducted in spring of 2023, identified eight articles on the topics of meat reduction, plant-based diets, and food waste, but no articles on these topics had been published in the Journal of International Marketing. Yet, understanding how changes in food consumption patterns can help buffer against the negative effects of climate change requires a global lens, as food systems are interlinked and the negative effects of food systems on climate change and vice versa disproportionately affect non-Western countries (e.g., due to more extreme shifts in climate). In this commentary, we thus call for more research that addresses demand-side GHG emission mitigation strategies related to food—that is, the reduction of meat consumption and food waste—from an international marketing perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X231182257\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X231182257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球粮食系统(即粮食的生产、运输、加工、包装、储存、零售、消费、损失和浪费)占温室气体排放总量的34%(联合国粮食及农业组织,2021年)。这些排放中很大一部分(14.5%)直接归因于肉类的生产和消费(Stoll-Kleemann and Schmidt, 2017)以及食物的损失和浪费(据政府间气候变化专门委员会[IPCC]估计,这一比例为8%-10%)。因此,许多国际组织,如政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)或欧盟委员会(EC)都同意,减少食品排放的两种有效的需求侧方法是集体转向更多的植物性饮食和全球努力减少食物浪费。综合起来,这两种方法可以减少对全球变暖的负面影响,比如气温上升,估计减少55%。食物偏好在很大程度上取决于社会经济因素、文化习俗和社会规范(Steenkamp 2019;Stoll-Kleemann and Schmidt 2017),因此各国差异很大(Godfray et al. 2018)。同样,尽管发达国家和发展中国家都有大约30%-40%的粮食损失或浪费,但由于基础设施、购物习惯以及对适当粮食储存的知识和投资的差异,其根本原因非常不同(Godfray et al. 2010)。因此,国际营销人员和政策制定者有很大的潜力为转向更可持续的饮食和减少食物浪费做出贡献,例如,通过有效设计考虑到这些当地市场具体情况的干预措施和行为改变运动。然而,在(国际)营销领域对这一主题的研究很少。在2023年春季进行的相关营销期刊(例如,Journal of marketing, Journal of marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Psychology)的简短搜索中,发现了8篇关于减少肉类、植物性饮食和食物浪费的文章,但没有关于这些主题的文章发表在《国际营销杂志》上。然而,理解粮食消费模式的变化如何有助于缓冲气候变化的负面影响需要一个全球视角,因为粮食系统是相互关联的,粮食系统对气候变化的负面影响(反之亦然)对非西方国家的影响不成比例(例如,由于气候的更极端变化)。因此,在本评论中,我们呼吁开展更多的研究,从国际营销的角度探讨与食品有关的需求方温室气体减排战略,即减少肉类消费和食物浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food Matters: The Role of International (Marketing) Efforts in Addressing a Looming Climate Threat
The global food system (i.e., production, transport, processing, packaging, storage, retail, consumption, loss, and waste of food) is responsible for 34% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2021). A significant proportion of these emissions (14.5%) are directly attributable to the production and consumption of meat (Stoll-Kleemann and Schmidt 2017) and the loss and waste of food (8%–10%, estimated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]). Many international organizations such as the IPCC or the European Commission (EC) thus agree that two effective demand-side ways to cut emissions from food are a collective shift toward more plant-based diets and global efforts to reduce food waste. Taken together, these two approaches could reduce the negative effects on global warming, such as a rise in temperatures, by an estimated 55%. Food preferences are largely determined by socioeconomic factors, cultural practices, and social norms (Steenkamp 2019; Stoll-Kleemann and Schmidt 2017) and thus differ greatly across countries (Godfray et al. 2018). Similarly, while roughly 30%–40% of all food is lost or wasted in both the developed and developing world, the underlying causes are very different due to variances in infrastructure, shopping practices, and knowledge of and investment in proper food storage (Godfray et al. 2010). As a result, there is great potential for international marketers and policy makers to contribute to a shift toward more sustainable diets and a reduction of food waste, for example, through the effective design of interventions and behavior change campaigns that take into consideration the specific conditions of these local markets. Research on the topic in the (international) marketing domain is scarce, however. A brief search in the relevant marketing journals (e.g., Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Psychology), conducted in spring of 2023, identified eight articles on the topics of meat reduction, plant-based diets, and food waste, but no articles on these topics had been published in the Journal of International Marketing. Yet, understanding how changes in food consumption patterns can help buffer against the negative effects of climate change requires a global lens, as food systems are interlinked and the negative effects of food systems on climate change and vice versa disproportionately affect non-Western countries (e.g., due to more extreme shifts in climate). In this commentary, we thus call for more research that addresses demand-side GHG emission mitigation strategies related to food—that is, the reduction of meat consumption and food waste—from an international marketing perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: As the globalization of markets continues at a rapid pace, business practitioners and educators alike face the challenge of staying current with the developments. Marketing managers require a source of new information and insights on international business events. International marketing educators require a forum for disseminating their thoughts and research findings. Journal of International Marketing(JIM) is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing international marketing practice, research, and theory. Contributions addressing any aspect of international marketing management are published each quarter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信