为儿童早期投资提供信息资源分配:国际同行评议证据综述

IF 1 4区经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS

Australian Economic Review Pub Date : 2022-02-09 DOI:10.1111/1467-8462.12452

Elizabeth A. Geelhoed, David E. Bloom, Catherine Bock, Paul Flatau, Joelie Mandzufas, Ian Li, Donna Cross

{"title":"为儿童早期投资提供信息资源分配:国际同行评议证据综述","authors":"Elizabeth A. Geelhoed, David E. Bloom, Catherine Bock, Paul Flatau, Joelie Mandzufas, Ian Li, Donna Cross","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.12452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Early childhood investment decisions represent critical policy frameworks that ideally reflect a strong evidence base. This review seeks to assess early childhood intervention priorities based on return on investment without limitation by health, education or social science sector. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature identified 858 eligible papers relating to economic evaluations of intervention in early childhood (0–4 years). Data for this narrative review was provided by 34 papers. The capacity to rank interventions and to compare relevance across disciplines is limited by the degree of heterogeneity across studies and the potential to compare published studies based on journal indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46348,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic Review","volume":"55 2","pages":"215-231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.12452","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing Resource Allocation for Investment in Early Childhood: A Review of the International Peer-Reviewed Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A. Geelhoed, David E. Bloom, Catherine Bock, Paul Flatau, Joelie Mandzufas, Ian Li, Donna Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8462.12452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Early childhood investment decisions represent critical policy frameworks that ideally reflect a strong evidence base. This review seeks to assess early childhood intervention priorities based on return on investment without limitation by health, education or social science sector. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature identified 858 eligible papers relating to economic evaluations of intervention in early childhood (0–4 years). Data for this narrative review was provided by 34 papers. The capacity to rank interventions and to compare relevance across disciplines is limited by the degree of heterogeneity across studies and the potential to compare published studies based on journal indices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"215-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.12452\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.12452\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.12452","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

儿童早期投资决策是关键的政策框架，理想情况下反映了强有力的证据基础。本审查旨在评估基于投资回报的儿童早期干预优先事项，不受卫生、教育或社会科学部门的限制。对同行评议文献的系统搜索确定了858篇与幼儿(0-4岁)干预的经济评估相关的合格论文。本叙述性综述的数据来自34篇论文。对干预措施进行排序和跨学科相关性比较的能力受到研究异质性程度和基于期刊索引比较已发表研究的潜力的限制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Informing Resource Allocation for Investment in Early Childhood: A Review of the International Peer-Reviewed Evidence

查看原文本刊更多论文

Informing Resource Allocation for Investment in Early Childhood: A Review of the International Peer-Reviewed Evidence

Early childhood investment decisions represent critical policy frameworks that ideally reflect a strong evidence base. This review seeks to assess early childhood intervention priorities based on return on investment without limitation by health, education or social science sector. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature identified 858 eligible papers relating to economic evaluations of intervention in early childhood (0–4 years). Data for this narrative review was provided by 34 papers. The capacity to rank interventions and to compare relevance across disciplines is limited by the degree of heterogeneity across studies and the potential to compare published studies based on journal indices.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian Economic Review ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： An applied economics journal with a strong policy orientation, The Australian Economic Review publishes high-quality articles applying economic analysis to a wide range of macroeconomic and microeconomic topics relevant to both economic and social policy issues. Produced by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, it is the leading journal of its kind in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. While it is of special interest to Australian academics, students, policy makers, and others interested in the Australian economy, the journal also considers matters of international interest.